Suppr超能文献

针刺疗法缓解盆腔炎性疾病疼痛的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Acupuncture therapies for relieving pain in pelvic inflammatory disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):e0292166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292166. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies investigating the effectiveness of acupuncture therapies in alleviating pain in pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) have gained increasing attention. However, to date, there have been no systematic reviews and meta-analyses providing high-quality evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapies in this context.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapies as complementary or alternative treatments for pain relief in patients with PID.

METHOD

A comprehensive search was conducted in eight databases from inception to February 20, 2023: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, VIP Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating acupuncture therapies as complementary or additional treatments to routine care were identified. Primary outcomes were pain intensity scores for abdominal or lumbosacral pain. The Cochrane risk of bias criteria was applied to assess the methodological quality of the included trials. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Data processing was performed using RevMan 5.4.

RESULT

This systematic review included twelve trials comprising a total of 1,165 patients. Among these, nine trials examined acupuncture therapies as adjunctive therapy, while the remaining three did not. Meta-analyses demonstrated that acupuncture therapies, whether used alone or in combination with routine treatment, exhibited greater efficacy in relieving abdominal pain compared to routine treatment alone immediately after the intervention (MD: -1.32; 95% CI: -1.60 to -1.05; P < 0.00001). The advantage of acupuncture therapies alone persisted for up to one month after the treatment (MD: -1.44; 95% CI: -2.15 to -0.72; P < 0.0001). Additionally, acupuncture therapies combined with routine treatment had a more pronounced effect in relieving lumbosacral pain after the intervention (MD: -1.14; 95% CI: -2.12 to -0.17; P < 0.00001) in patients with PID. The incidence of adverse events did not increase with the addition of acupuncture therapies (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.21 to 1.51; P = 0.25). The findings also indicated that acupuncture therapies, as a complementary treatment, could induce anti-inflammatory cytokines, reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines, alleviate anxiety, and improve the quality of life in patients with PID.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that acupuncture therapies may effectively reduce pain intensity in the abdomen and lumbosacral region as complementary or alternative treatments, induce anti-inflammatory cytokines, decrease pro-inflammatory cytokines, alleviate anxiety, and enhance the quality of life in patients with PID, without increasing the occurrence of adverse events. However, due to the low quality of the included trials, the conclusion should be interpreted with caution, highlighting the need for further high-quality trials to establish more reliable conclusions.

摘要

背景

研究表明,针灸疗法在缓解盆腔炎(PID)疼痛方面具有一定疗效。然而,目前尚无系统评价和荟萃分析提供高质量证据,评估针灸疗法在 PID 患者中的疗效和安全性。

目的

本研究旨在评估针灸疗法作为 PID 患者疼痛缓解的辅助或替代治疗方法的疗效和安全性。

方法

全面检索了从建库至 2023 年 2 月 20 日 8 个数据库:PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库。纳入针灸疗法作为常规治疗的补充或附加治疗,用于治疗 PID 的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局为腹部或腰骶部疼痛的疼痛强度评分。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险标准评估纳入试验的方法学质量。采用推荐、评估、制定与评价分级(GRADE)系统评估证据质量。数据处理采用 RevMan 5.4 软件。

结果

本系统评价纳入了 12 项 RCT,共纳入 1165 例患者。其中,9 项研究评估了针灸疗法作为辅助治疗,其余 3 项未评估。荟萃分析显示,与单纯常规治疗相比,针灸疗法无论是单独使用还是与常规治疗联合使用,在干预后即刻缓解腹痛方面均具有更大的疗效(MD:-1.32;95%CI:-1.60 至-1.05;P<0.00001)。针灸疗法单独使用的优势在治疗后 1 个月内仍持续存在(MD:-1.44;95%CI:-2.15 至-0.72;P<0.0001)。此外,对于 PID 患者,针灸疗法联合常规治疗在干预后即刻缓解腰骶部疼痛方面具有更显著的效果(MD:-1.14;95%CI:-2.12 至-0.17;P<0.00001)。同时,添加针灸疗法并未增加不良反应的发生率(OR:0.56;95%CI:0.21 至 1.51;P=0.25)。研究结果还表明,针灸疗法作为一种补充治疗方法,可能通过诱导抗炎细胞因子、减少促炎细胞因子、缓解焦虑和提高 PID 患者的生活质量来缓解疼痛。

结论

本研究结果表明,针灸疗法作为辅助或替代治疗,可能有效减轻 PID 患者的腹痛和腰骶部疼痛程度,诱导抗炎细胞因子,减少促炎细胞因子,缓解焦虑,提高生活质量,且不会增加不良反应的发生。然而,由于纳入研究的质量较低,结论应谨慎解读,这突出表明需要进行更多高质量的试验以建立更可靠的结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27df/10830011/97a730678bfb/pone.0292166.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验