Deng R F, Long L Y, Chen Y W, Jiang Z Y, Jiang L, Zou L J, Zhang Y L
Medical Center of Burn Plastic and Wound Repair, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China.
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2024 Jan 20;40(1):64-71. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231114-00194.
To investigate the clinical repair strategy for ischial tuberosity pressure ulcers based on the sinus tract condition and range of skin and soft tissue defects. The study was a retrospective observational study. From July 2017 to March 2023, 21 patients with stage Ⅲ or Ⅳ ischial tuberosity pressure ulcers who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, including 13 males and 8 females, aged 14-84 years. There were 31 ischial tuberosity pressure ulcers, with an area of 1.5 cm×1.0 cm-8.0 cm×6.0 cm. After en bloc resection and debridement, the range of skin and soft tissue defect was 6.0 cm×3.0 cm-15.0 cm×8.0 cm. According to the depth and size of sinus tract and range of skin and soft tissue defects on the wound after debridement, the wounds were repaired according to the following three conditions. (1) When there was no sinus tract or the sinus tract was superficial, with a skin and soft tissue defect range of 6.0 cm×3.0 cm-8.5 cm×6.5 cm, the wound was repaired by direct suture, Z-plasty, transfer of buttock local flap, or V-Y advancement of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flap. (2) When the sinus tract was deep and small, with a skin and soft tissue defect range of 8.5 cm×4.5 cm-11.0 cm×6.5 cm, the wound was repaired by the transfer and filling of gracilis muscle flap followed by direct suture, or Z-plasty, or combined with transfer of inferior gluteal artery perforator flap. (3) When the sinus tract was deep and large, with a skin and soft tissue defect range of 7.5 cm×5.5 cm-15.0 cm×8.0 cm, the wound was repaired by the transfer and filling of gracilis muscle flap and gluteus maximus muscle flap transfer, followed by direct suture, Z-plasty, or combined with transfer of buttock local flap; and transfer and filling of biceps femoris long head muscle flap combined with rotary transfer of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flap; and filling of the inferior gluteal artery perforator adipofascial flap transfer combined with V-Y advancement of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flap. A total of 7 buttock local flaps with incision area of 8.0 cm×6.0 cm-19.0 cm×16.0 cm, 21 gracilis muscle flaps with incision area of 18.0 cm×3.0 cm-24.0 cm×5.0 cm, 9 inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps or inferior gluteal artery perforator adipofascial flaps with incision area of 8.5 cm×6.0 cm-13.0 cm×7.5 cm, 10 gluteal maximus muscle flaps with incision area of 8.0 cm×5.0 cm-13.0 cm×7.0 cm, 2 biceps femoris long head muscle flaps with incision area of 17.0 cm×3.0 cm and 20.0 cm×5.0 cm, and 5 posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flaps with incision area of 12.0 cm×6.5 cm-21.0 cm×10.0 cm were used. The donor area wounds were directly sutured. The survival of muscle flap, adipofascial flap, and flap, and wound healing in the donor area were observed after operation. The recovery of pressure ulcer and recurrence of patients were followed up. After surgery, all the buttock local flaps, gracilis muscle flaps, gluteus maximus muscle flaps, inferior gluteal artery perforator adipofascial flaps, and biceps femoris long head muscle flaps survived well. In one case, the distal part of one posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flap was partially necrotic, and the wound was healed after dressing changes. In another patient, bruises developed in the distal end of inferior gluteal artery perforator flap. It was somewhat relieved after removal of some sutures, but a small part of the necrosis was still present, and the wound was healed after bedside debridement and suture. The other posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flaps and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps survived well. In one patient, the wound at the donor site caused incision dehiscence due to postoperative bleeding in the donor area. The wound was healed after debridement+Z-plasty+dressing change. The wounds in the rest donor areas of patients were healed well. After 3 to 15 months of follow-up, all the pressure ulcers of patients were repaired well without recurrence. After debridement of ischial tuberosity pressure ulcer, if there is no sinus tract formation or sinus surface is superficial, direct suture, Z-plasty, buttock local flap, or V-Y advancement repair of posterior femoral cutaneous nerve nutrient vessel flap can be selected according to the range of skin and soft tissue defects. If the sinus tract of the wound is deep, the proper tissue flap can be selected to fill the sinus tract according to the size of sinus tract and range of the skin and soft tissue defects, and then the wound can be closed with individualized flap to obtain good repair effect.
探讨基于窦道情况及皮肤软组织缺损范围的坐骨结节压疮临床修复策略。本研究为回顾性观察性研究。2017年7月至2023年3月,南昌大学第一附属医院收治符合纳入标准的Ⅲ期或Ⅳ期坐骨结节压疮患者21例,其中男13例,女8例,年龄14 - 84岁。共有31处坐骨结节压疮,面积为1.5 cm×1.0 cm - 8.0 cm×6.0 cm。整块切除并清创后,皮肤软组织缺损范围为6.0 cm×3.0 cm - 15.0 cm×8.0 cm。根据清创后伤口窦道的深度和大小以及皮肤软组织缺损范围,按以下三种情况修复伤口。(1)无窦道或窦道表浅,皮肤软组织缺损范围为6.0 cm×3.0 cm - 8.5 cm×6.5 cm时,采用直接缝合、Z成形术、臀局部皮瓣转移或股后皮神经营养血管皮瓣V - Y推进修复伤口。(2)窦道深且小,皮肤软组织缺损范围为8.5 cm×4.5 cm - 11.0 cm×6.5 cm时,采用股薄肌肌瓣转移填充后直接缝合、Z成形术,或联合臀下动脉穿支皮瓣转移修复伤口。(3)窦道深且大,皮肤软组织缺损范围为7.5 cm×5.5 cm - 15.0 cm×8.0 cm时,采用股薄肌肌瓣和臀大肌肌瓣转移填充,然后直接缝合、Z成形术,或联合臀局部皮瓣转移;股二头肌长头肌瓣转移填充联合股后皮神经营养血管皮瓣旋转转移;臀下动脉穿支脂肪筋膜瓣转移填充联合股后皮神经营养血管皮瓣V - Y推进。共使用7块臀局部皮瓣,切口面积为8.0 cm×6.0 cm - 19.0 cm×16.0 cm;21块股薄肌肌瓣,切口面积为18.0 cm×3.0 cm - 24.0 cm×5.0 cm;9块臀下动脉穿支皮瓣或臀下动脉穿支脂肪筋膜瓣,切口面积为8.5 cm×6.0 cm - 13.0 cm×7.5 cm;10块臀大肌肌瓣,切口面积为8.0 cm×5.0 cm -