• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Barriers to and facilitators of successful implementation of a palliative approach to care in primary care practices: a mixed methods study.在基层医疗实践中成功实施姑息治疗方法的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 31;14(1):e079234. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079234.
2
How do inner and outer settings affect implementation of a community-based innovation for older adults with a serious illness: a qualitative study.内外环境如何影响面向患有重病的老年人的基于社区的创新实施:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06031-6.
3
Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of new critical care practices during COVID-19: a multicenter qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).在 COVID-19 期间实施新的重症监护实践的促进因素和障碍:使用整合实施研究框架(CFIR)的多中心定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 20;23(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09209-w.
4
Barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination in primary care practices: a mixed methods study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.初级保健机构中HPV疫苗接种的障碍与促进因素:一项运用整合性实施研究框架的混合方法研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 7;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0750-5.
5
Formative evaluation and adaptation of pre-and early implementation of diabetes shared medical appointments to maximize sustainability and adoption.对糖尿病共享医疗预约的前期及早期实施进行形成性评估和调整,以最大限度地提高可持续性和采用率。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 7;19(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0797-3.
6
Barriers and facilitators of implementing the practice programme for upright positions in the second stage of labour: A mixed-method study.第二产程实施直立位实践方案的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Nov 3. doi: 10.1111/jan.15927.
7
Barriers and facilitators to national guideline implementation for palliative cancer care in a Danish cross-sectoral healthcare setting: A qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences.丹麦跨部门医疗保健环境中实施姑息治疗癌症护理国家指南的障碍和促进因素:医疗保健专业人员经验的定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2024 Jan;33(1):e6267. doi: 10.1002/pon.6267. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
8
Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify barriers affecting implementation of an online frailty tool into primary health care: a qualitative study.应用实施研究的整合框架来识别影响在线衰弱工具在初级卫生保健中实施的障碍:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 31;18(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3163-1.
9
Implementing a physical activity project for people with dementia in Germany-Identification of barriers and facilitator using consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR): A qualitative study.在德国为痴呆症患者实施一项身体活动项目 - 使用实施研究综合框架 (CFIR) 识别障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 9;18(8):e0289737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289737. eCollection 2023.
10
Barriers and facilitators to implementing imaging-based diagnostic artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making software in hospitals in China: a qualitative study using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.在中国医院实施基于影像的诊断人工智能辅助决策软件的障碍和促进因素:使用更新的实施研究综合框架进行的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 10;14(9):e084398. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084398.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the Role of Clinical Champions and Their Impact on Clinician Behavior Change: The Need for Causal Pathway Mechanisms.理解临床倡导者的角色及其对临床医生行为改变的影响:对因果路径机制的需求。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Jul 13;2:896885. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.896885. eCollection 2022.
2
Australian general practice experiences of implementing a structured approach to initiating advance care planning and palliative care: a qualitative study.澳大利亚全科医学实施结构化方法启动预先医疗照护计划和姑息治疗的经验:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 28;12(3):e057184. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057184.
3
Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™) in a Danish healthcare context: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and content validation.支持性和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT™)在丹麦医疗保健环境中的应用:翻译、跨文化调适和内容验证。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Mar 24;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00931-6.
4
Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum.概念化与实施研究整合框架(CFIR)一起使用的结果:CFIR 结果附录。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 22;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5.
5
Scalable Model for Delivery of Inpatient Palliative Care During a Pandemic.大流行期间住院姑息治疗提供的可扩展模型。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Jul;38(7):877-882. doi: 10.1177/10499091211005701. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
Measurement of clinical documentation burden among physicians and nurses using electronic health records: a scoping review.使用电子健康记录衡量医生和护士的临床文档负担:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Apr 23;28(5):998-1008. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa325.
7
Effects of an Integrated Palliative Care Pathway: More Proactive GPs, Well Timed, and Less Acute Care: A Clustered, Partially Controlled Before-After Study.综合姑息治疗路径的效果:更积极的全科医生、更及时的治疗、更少的急性治疗:一项聚类、部分对照的前后研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Feb;22(2):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.025. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
Implementation of Primary Palliative Care in five Belgian regions: A qualitative study on early identification of palliative care needs by general practitioners.在五个比利时地区实施初级姑息治疗:全科医生早期识别姑息治疗需求的定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):146-153. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2020.1825675.
9
Champions in context: which attributes matter for change efforts in healthcare?背景下的冠军:哪些属性对医疗保健的变革努力重要?
Implement Sci. 2020 Aug 6;15(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01024-9.
10
An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success.临床决策支持系统概述:益处、风险及成功策略。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 6;3:17. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y. eCollection 2020.

在基层医疗实践中成功实施姑息治疗方法的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。

Barriers to and facilitators of successful implementation of a palliative approach to care in primary care practices: a mixed methods study.

机构信息

Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 31;14(1):e079234. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079234.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079234
PMID:38296276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10831432/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Integrating a palliative approach to care into primary care is an emerging evidence-based practice. Despite the evidence, this type of care has not been widely adopted into primary care settings. The objective of this study was to examine the barriers to and facilitators of successful implementation of a palliative approach to care in primary care practices by applying an implementation science framework.

DESIGN

This convergent mixed methods study analysed semistructured interviews and expression of interest forms to evaluate the implementation of a protocol, linked to implementation strategies, for a palliative approach to care called Early Palliation through Integrated Care (EPIC) in three primary care practices. This study assessed barriers to and facilitators of implementation of EPIC and was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). A framework analysis approach was used during the study to determine the applicability of CFIR constructs and domains.

SETTING

Primary care practices in Canada. Interviews were conducted between September 2020 and November 2021.

PARTICIPANTS

10 individuals were interviewed, who were involved in implementing EPIC. Three individuals from each practice were reinterviewed to clarify emerging themes.

RESULTS

Overall, there were implementation barriers at multiple levels that caused some practices to struggle. However, barriers were mitigated when practices had the following facilitators: (1) a high level of intra-practice collaboration, (2) established practices with organisational structures that enhanced communications, (3) effective leveraging of EPIC project supports to transition care, (4) perceptions that EPIC was an opportunity to make a long-term change in their approach to care as opposed to a limited term project and (5) strong practice champions.

CONCLUSIONS

Future implementation work should consider assessing facilitators identified in our results to better gauge primary care pre-implementation readiness. In addition, providing primary care practices with support to help offset the additional work of implementing innovations and networking opportunities where they can share strategies may improve implementation success.

摘要

目的

将姑息治疗方法融入初级保健是一种新兴的循证实践。尽管有证据表明,这种护理方式尚未在初级保健环境中广泛采用。本研究的目的是通过应用实施科学框架,检查在初级保健实践中成功实施姑息治疗方法的障碍和促进因素。

设计

这项收敛混合方法研究分析了半结构化访谈和表达兴趣的表格,以评估实施与实施策略相关的姑息治疗方法协议的情况,该协议称为早期姑息治疗通过综合护理(EPIC),在三个初级保健实践中进行。这项研究评估了 EPIC 实施的障碍和促进因素,并由实施研究综合框架(CFIR)指导。在研究过程中使用了框架分析方法来确定 CFIR 结构和领域的适用性。

设置

加拿大的初级保健实践。访谈于 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 11 月进行。

参与者

参与实施 EPIC 的 10 人接受了采访。每个实践的 3 人接受了重新采访以澄清新出现的主题。

结果

总体而言,多个层面存在实施障碍,导致一些实践面临困难。然而,当实践具备以下促进因素时,障碍会得到缓解:(1)高水平的内部实践合作;(2)具有增强沟通的组织结构的既定实践;(3)有效利用 EPIC 项目支持过渡护理;(4)认为 EPIC 是一个长期改变护理方法的机会,而不是一个有限期限的项目;(5)强大的实践拥护者。

结论

未来的实施工作应考虑评估我们研究结果中确定的促进因素,以更好地衡量初级保健实施前的准备情况。此外,为初级保健实践提供支持,以帮助减轻实施创新的额外工作,并提供网络机会,以便他们可以分享策略,可能会提高实施的成功率。