University of North Carolina at Charlotte, College of Health and Human Services, Department of Applied Physiology, Health, and Clinical Respiratory Care Programs, Charlotte, North Carolina
University of North Carolina at Greensboro, School of Health and Human Sciences, Department of Kinesiology, Greensboro, North Carolina.
Respir Care. 2024 Jul 24;69(8):913-923. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10327.
Evidence-based practice is at the forefront of providing quality patient care by using the best available evidence and clinical expertise, while also considering patient needs and preferences for clinical decisions. However, evidence-based practice may not be consistently used even when the evidence supports the therapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the factors associated with the use of evidence-based practice among respiratory therapy faculty teaching in a large community college system and post-professional students enrolled in a university-based, respiratory therapy baccalaureate degree-advancement program.
A non-probability, descriptive survey research design was used to develop and administer an online questionnaire.
All respondents demonstrated sufficient knowledge and understanding of introductory concepts of evidence-based practice but knowledge of specific components of the evidence-based practice process was not as strong. Self-efficacy in knowledge and the use of evidence-based practice among faculty and degree-advancement students varied. Faculty and students rated their self-efficacy high in assessing patients' needs, values, and treatment preferences but ratings were lower for using the PICO (patient/population/problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) technique and interpreting common statistical tests. Students viewed their previous evidence-based practice learning experiences more favorably compared with faculty ( = .008). Faculty and students searched and read the research literature more often compared with critically appraising and using the research literature. Logistic regression analysis indicated no statistically significant relationship of knowledge, self-efficacy, and learning experiences to the use of evidence-based practice among respiratory therapy students, (4, 54) = 7.73; = .10.
Analysis of the results suggested that respiratory therapy faculty and students were knowledgeable and confident with regard to evidence-based practice but their use of evidence-based practice in clinical decisions was limited. Although the evidence-based practice knowledge, self-efficacy, and learning experiences had minimal influence on the use of evidence-based practice, the results of the study provide a foundation for future research.
循证实践是通过使用最佳现有证据和临床专业知识,同时考虑患者对临床决策的需求和偏好,为提供高质量的患者护理而处于前沿地位。然而,即使有证据支持治疗,循证实践也可能没有得到一致应用。本研究的目的是评估在大型社区学院系统中教授呼吸治疗学的师资人员和在基于大学的呼吸治疗学学士学位进阶项目中注册的毕业后学生使用循证实践的相关因素。
采用非概率描述性调查研究设计,开发并管理在线问卷。
所有受访者都表现出对循证实践入门概念的充分了解,但对循证实践过程的具体组成部分的了解则不太深入。师资人员和进阶学生在知识和循证实践使用方面的自我效能感存在差异。师资人员和学生在评估患者的需求、价值观和治疗偏好方面对自己的自我效能感评价较高,但在使用 PICO(患者/人群/问题、干预、比较、结果)技术和解释常见统计测试方面的评价较低。与师资人员相比,学生对其以前的循证实践学习经验的评价更为有利( =.008)。与批判性地评估和使用研究文献相比,师资人员和学生更经常搜索和阅读研究文献。逻辑回归分析表明,知识、自我效能和学习经验与呼吸治疗学生使用循证实践之间没有统计学上的显著关系, (4, 54) = 7.73; =.10。
对结果的分析表明,呼吸治疗学师资人员和学生在循证实践方面具有丰富的知识和信心,但他们在临床决策中应用循证实践的能力有限。尽管循证实践知识、自我效能和学习经验对循证实践的应用影响很小,但研究结果为未来的研究提供了基础。