Lau Ying, Wong Sai Ho, Chee Daniel Guang Hui, Ng Brenda Sok Peng, Ang Wen Wei, Han Chad Yixian, Cheng Ling Jie
The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Alexandra Hospital, Singapore.
Obes Rev. 2024 May;25(5):e13699. doi: 10.1111/obr.13699. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
The prevalence of overweight and obesity has continued to increase globally, and one-size-fits-all dietary recommendations may not be suitable for different individual characteristics. A personalized nutrition intervention may be a potential solution. This review aims to evaluate the effects of the technology-delivered personalized nutrition intervention on energy, fat, vegetable, and fruit intakes among adults with overweight and obesity. A three-step comprehensive search strategy was performed from 10 databases and seven clinical registries in published and unpublished trials. A total of 46 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 19,670 adults with overweight and obesity from 14 countries are included. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted. Meta-analyses showed a reduction of energy intake (-128.05, 95% CI: -197.08, -59.01) and fat intake (-1.81% energy/days, 95% CI: -3.38, -0.24, and -0.19 scores, 95% CI: -0.40, 0.02) in the intervention compared with the comparator. Significant improvements in vegetable and fruit intakes with 0.12-0.15 servings/day were observed in the intervention. Combined one- and two-way interactions had a greater effect on energy intake reduction compared with their counterparts. Meta-regression analyses revealed that no significant covariates were found. Given that the certainty of the evidence was rated as low or very low, further well-designed RCTs with long-term follow-up are warranted.
全球超重和肥胖的患病率持续上升,一刀切的饮食建议可能不适用于不同的个体特征。个性化营养干预可能是一个潜在的解决方案。本综述旨在评估通过技术提供的个性化营养干预对超重和肥胖成年人的能量、脂肪、蔬菜和水果摄入量的影响。我们从10个数据库和7个临床注册库中对已发表和未发表的试验进行了三步全面检索策略。总共纳入了来自14个国家的46项随机对照试验(RCT),涉及19,670名超重和肥胖成年人。进行了亚组分析和Meta回归分析。Meta分析表明,与对照组相比,干预组的能量摄入量减少(-128.05,95%置信区间:-197.08,-59.01),脂肪摄入量减少(-1.81%能量/天,95%置信区间:-3.38,-0.24;-0.19分,95%置信区间:-0.40,0.02)。干预组的蔬菜和水果摄入量有显著改善,每天增加0.12 - 0.15份。与单独的单向和双向交互作用相比,联合的单向和双向交互作用对能量摄入量减少的影响更大。Meta回归分析显示未发现显著的协变量。鉴于证据的确定性被评为低或非常低,有必要进行进一步设计良好且有长期随访的RCT。