Suppr超能文献

一种新型图表查房应用程序在虚拟学术环境中促进同行评审的实施。

Implementation of a Novel Chart Rounds Application to Facilitate Peer Review in a Virtual Academic Environment.

作者信息

Ali Naba, Schreibmann Eduard, Kayode Oluwatosin, Patel Ashish, Patel Pretesh, Qian David, McCall Neal, Lorenz Joshua, Higgins Kristin A, Bradley Jeffrey, Brown Susan, Shelton Joseph

机构信息

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Nov 18;9(3):101406. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101406. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Peer review in the form of chart rounds is a critical component of quality assurance and safety in radiation therapy treatments. Radiation therapy departments have undergone significant changes that impose challenges to meaningful review, including institutional growth and increasing use of virtual environment. We discuss the implementation of a novel chart rounds (NCR) format and application adapted to modern peer review needs at a single high-volume multisite National Cancer Institute designated cancer center.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A working group was created to improve upon the prior institutional chart rounds format (standard chart rounds or SCR). Using a novel in-house application and format redesign, an NCR was created and implemented to accomplish stated goals. Data regarding the SCR and NCR system were then extracted for review.

RESULTS

SCR consisted of 2- 90-minute weekly sessions held to review plans across all disease sites, review of 49 plans per hour on average. NCR uses 1-hour long sessions divided by disease site, enabling additional time to be spent per patient (11 plans per hour on average) and more robust discussion. The NCR application is able to automate a list of plans requiring peer review from the institutional treatment planning system. The novel application incorporates features that enable efficient and accurate review of plans in the virtual setting across multiple sites. A systematic scoring system is integrated into the application to record feedback. Over 5 months of use of the NCR, 1160 plans have been reviewed with 143 scored as requiring minor changes, 32 requiring major changes and 307 with comments. Major changes triggered treatment replan. Feedback from scoring is incorporated into physician workflow to ensure changes are addressed.

CONCLUSION

The presented NCR format and application enables standardized and highly reliable peer review of radiation therapy plans that is robust across a variety of complex planning scenarios and could be implemented globally.

摘要

目的

以病例讨论会形式进行的同行评审是放射治疗质量保证和安全的关键组成部分。放射治疗科室经历了重大变革,这给有意义的评审带来了挑战,包括机构发展以及虚拟环境使用的增加。我们讨论了一种新颖的病例讨论会(NCR)形式及其应用,该形式适用于一家高工作量多院区的国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心的现代同行评审需求。

方法与材料

成立了一个工作组以改进先前的机构病例讨论会形式(标准病例讨论会或SCR)。通过使用一种新颖的内部应用程序并重新设计形式,创建并实施了NCR以实现既定目标。然后提取有关SCR和NCR系统的数据进行审查。

结果

SCR包括每周举行2次90分钟的会议,以审查所有疾病部位的治疗计划,平均每小时审查49个计划。NCR使用按疾病部位划分的1小时会议,使每个患者有更多时间(平均每小时11个计划)并进行更深入的讨论。NCR应用程序能够从机构治疗计划系统自动生成需要同行评审的计划列表。该新颖应用程序具有一些功能,可在虚拟环境中跨多个站点高效准确地审查计划。一个系统的评分系统集成到应用程序中以记录反馈。在使用NCR的5个多月时间里,共审查了1160个计划,其中143个被评为需要进行小的修改,32个需要进行重大修改,307个有评论。重大修改触发了治疗重新计划。评分反馈被纳入医生工作流程以确保问题得到解决。

结论

所介绍的NCR形式和应用程序能够对放射治疗计划进行标准化且高度可靠的同行评审,这种评审在各种复杂的计划场景中都很有效,并且可以在全球范围内实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f0/10828579/baac8153c5a8/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验