El Hadouchi Mohamed, Kiers Henri, Boerstra Brittany A, Veenhof Cindy, van Dieën Jaap
Institute for Human Movement Studies, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 7, 3584, CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 12;10(2):e24362. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24362. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that power training has the ability to improve muscle power and physical performance in older adults. However, power training definitions are broad and previously-established criteria are vague, making the validity and replicability of power training interventions used in RCTs uncertain.
The aim of this review was to assess whether the power training interventions identified in a previous systematic review (el Hadouchi 2022) are fully described, therapeutically valid, and meet our proposed criteria for power training.
Review.
Power training interventions used in older adults, previously-identified in a systematic review, were assessed. The completeness of intervention descriptions was evaluated using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR), and therapeutic validity was evaluated using the CONTENT scale in combination with a set of criteria specific for power training.
None of the power training interventions were fully described or met the CONTENT scale's criteria for therapeutic validity. Five out of 14 interventions (35.7 %) met all specific power training criteria.
Power training interventions used in RCTs comparing power training to strength training are poor to moderately described, may not be therapeutically valid, and may not reflect the construct of power training. This makes it difficult for clinicians or researchers to apply or replicate power training interventions reported in RCTs, and begs the question whether the true effects of power training have been estimated.
随机对照试验(RCT)表明,力量训练有能力改善老年人的肌肉力量和身体机能。然而,力量训练的定义宽泛,先前确立的标准模糊,这使得随机对照试验中使用的力量训练干预措施的有效性和可重复性存在不确定性。
本综述的目的是评估在先前的一项系统评价(el Hadouchi,2022年)中确定的力量训练干预措施是否得到充分描述、具有治疗有效性,以及是否符合我们提出的力量训练标准。
综述。
对先前在一项系统评价中确定的用于老年人的力量训练干预措施进行评估。使用干预描述与复制模板(TIDieR)评估干预描述的完整性,并结合一套针对力量训练的特定标准,使用CONTENT量表评估治疗有效性。
没有一项力量训练干预措施得到充分描述,也不符合CONTENT量表的治疗有效性标准。14项干预措施中有5项(35.7%)符合所有特定的力量训练标准。
在将力量训练与力量训练进行比较的随机对照试验中使用的力量训练干预措施描述不佳至中等,可能没有治疗有效性,也可能没有反映力量训练的概念。这使得临床医生或研究人员难以应用或复制随机对照试验中报告的力量训练干预措施,并引发了力量训练的真实效果是否已被评估的问题。