Aiswareya Gunaseelan, Verma Sanjeev K, Khan Saba, Owais Mohammad, Farooqi Izharul H, Naseem Sufia
Department of Orthodontics and Dental Anatomy, Dr. Z. A. Dental College, Aligarh, India.
Department of Interdisciplinary Biotechnology Unit, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2023 Dec 27;13(6):469-476. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_65_23. eCollection 2023 Nov-Dec.
To quantify and compare the metal ions released from different bracket-wire combinations and to assess their cytotoxicity.
A total of 360 fabricated sectional fixed orthodontic appliances were divided into 6 groups. The first three groups consisted of stainless-steel brackets with stainless-steel, snickel-titanium (NiTi), and titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) archwires, and the other three groups were fabricated using ceramic brackets (polycrystalline alumina) with stainless-steel, NiTi, and TMA archwires. These appliances were immersed in artificial saliva (pH 6.5 ± 0.5, 37°C), for 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month. The nickel and chromium ions released in the artificial saliva were quantified using a flame atomic absorption spectrometer, and cytotoxicity assessment was performed using a 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay on human cervical cancer cell line.
The stainless-steel bracket groups displayed a significantly greater release of nickel and chromium ions compared to the ceramic bracket groups ( < 0.05). However, no significant differences were identified when comparing the three archwire types within the stainless-steel/ceramic bracket groups. At the end of 1 month, the % cell viability demonstrated by the appliances was in the decreasing order of stainless-steel-TMA > ceramic-stainless steel > stainless-steel-NiTi > ceramic-NiTi > stainless-steel-stainless steel > ceramic-TMA.
Considerably greater release of nickel and chromium ions was observed from the appliances utilizing stainless-steel brackets compared to those employing ceramic brackets. However, no remarkable difference in the levels of nickel and chromium ions was observed when comparing the three archwires: stainless steel, NiTi, and TMA. In the cytotoxicity assessment, the ceramic-TMA combination displayed the highest level of cytotoxicity, while the stainless-steel-TMA combination displayed the least cytotoxicity.
量化并比较不同托槽-弓丝组合释放的金属离子,并评估其细胞毒性。
总共360个制作好的分段固定正畸矫治器被分为6组。前三组由搭配不锈钢丝、镍钛(NiTi)丝和钛钼合金(TMA)弓丝的不锈钢托槽组成,另外三组则使用搭配不锈钢丝、NiTi丝和TMA弓丝的陶瓷托槽(多晶氧化铝)制作。这些矫治器被浸泡在人工唾液(pH 6.5±0.5,37°C)中1周、2周和1个月。使用火焰原子吸收光谱仪对人工唾液中释放的镍和铬离子进行定量,并使用3-[4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基]-2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴盐(MTT)法对人宫颈癌细胞系进行细胞毒性评估。
与陶瓷托槽组相比,不锈钢托槽组释放的镍和铬离子明显更多(<0.05)。然而,在不锈钢/陶瓷托槽组内比较三种弓丝类型时,未发现显著差异。在1个月结束时,矫治器所显示的细胞活力百分比按以下顺序递减:不锈钢-TMA>陶瓷-不锈钢>不锈钢-NiTi>陶瓷-NiTi>不锈钢-不锈钢>陶瓷-TMA。
与使用陶瓷托槽的矫治器相比,使用不锈钢托槽的矫治器释放的镍和铬离子明显更多。然而,比较不锈钢、NiTi和TMA这三种弓丝时,镍和铬离子水平未观察到显著差异。在细胞毒性评估中,陶瓷-TMA组合显示出最高水平的细胞毒性,而不锈钢-TMA组合显示出最低的细胞毒性。