Nayak Rabindra S, Shafiuddin Bareera, Pasha Azam, Vinay K, Narayan Anjali, Shetty Smitha V
Professor and Head, Department of Orthodontics, MR Ambedkar Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Postgraduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, MR Ambedkar Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
J Int Oral Health. 2015 Jul;7(7):29-35.
Technological advances in wire selection and bracket design have led to improved treatment efficiency and allowed longer time intervals between appliance adjustments. The wires remain in the mouth for a longer duration and are subjected to electrochemical reactions, mechanical forces of mastication and generalized wear. These cause different types of corrosion. This study was done to compare the galvanic currents generated between different combinations of brackets and archwires commonly used in orthodontic practices.
The materials used for the study included different commercially available orthodontic archwires and brackets. The galvanic current generated by individual materials and different combinations of these materials was tested and compared. The orthodontic archwires used were 0.019″ × 0.025″ heat-activated nickel-titanium (3M Unitek), 0.019″ × 0.025″ beta-titanium (3M Unitek) and 0.019″ × 0.025″ stainless steel (3M Unitek). The orthodontic brackets used were 0.022″ MBT laser-cut (Victory Series, 3M Unitek) and metal-injection molded (Leone Company) maxillary central incisor brackets respectively. The ligature wire used for ligation was 0.009″ stainless steel ligature (HP Company). The galvanic current for individual archwires, brackets, and the different bracket-archwire-ligature combinations was measured by using a Potentiostat machine. The data were generated using the Linear Sweep Voltammetry and OriginPro 8.5 Graphing and Data Analysis Softwares. The study was conducted in two phases. Phase I comprised of five groups for open circuit potential (OCP) and galvanic current (I), whereas Phase II comprised of six groups for galvanic current alone.
Mean, standard deviation and range were computed for the OCP and galvanic current (I) values obtained. Results were subjected to statistical analysis through ANOVA. In Phase I, higher mean OCP was recorded in stainless steel archwire, followed by beta-titanium archwire, heat-activated nickel titanium archwire, laser-cut bracket and metal-injection molded bracket, respectively. The difference in mean OCP recorded among the groups was found to be statistically significant in aerated phosphate buffered saline solution. The galvanic current (I) for metal-injection molded stainless steel brackets showed significantly higher values than all the other materials. Phase II results suggested that, in the couples formed by the archwire-bracket-ligature combinations, the bracket had more important contribution to the total galvanic current generated, since there were significant differences between galvanic current among the 2 brackets tested but not among the 3 wires. The galvanic current of the metal-injection molded bracket was significantly higher than that of laser-cut bracket. Highest mean current (I) was recorded in metal-injection molded bracket when used with heat-activated nickel titanium archwire while lowest mean current (I) was recorded in laser-cut bracket when used with beta-titanium archwire.
The present study concluded that the bracket emerged to be the most important factor in determining the galvanic current (I). Higher mean current (I) was recorded in metal-injection molded bracket compared to laser-cut bracket. Among the three archwires, higher mean current (I) was recorded in heat-activated nickel-titanium, followed by stainless-steel and beta-titanium respectively. When coupled together; highest mean current (I) was recorded in metal-injection molded bracket when used with heat-activated nickel titanium archwire while lowest mean current (I) was recorded in laser-cut bracket when used with beta-titanium archwire.
在正畸钢丝选择和托槽设计方面的技术进步提高了治疗效率,并延长了矫治器调整的时间间隔。钢丝在口腔内停留的时间更长,会发生电化学反应、咀嚼的机械力作用以及普遍的磨损。这些会导致不同类型的腐蚀。本研究旨在比较正畸临床中常用的不同托槽和弓丝组合之间产生的电流。
本研究使用的材料包括不同市售的正畸弓丝和托槽。对每种材料以及这些材料的不同组合产生的电流进行测试和比较。使用的正畸弓丝为0.019英寸×0.025英寸热激活镍钛丝(3M Unitek公司)、0.019英寸×0.025英寸β钛丝(3M Unitek公司)和0.019英寸×0.025英寸不锈钢丝(3M Unitek公司)。使用的正畸托槽分别为0.022英寸MBT激光切割托槽(胜利系列,3M Unitek公司)和金属注射成型托槽(Leone公司)上颌中切牙托槽。用于结扎的结扎丝为0.009英寸不锈钢结扎丝(HP公司)。使用恒电位仪测量每种弓丝、托槽以及不同托槽 - 弓丝 - 结扎丝组合的电流。数据通过线性扫描伏安法以及OriginPro 8.5绘图和数据分析软件生成。本研究分两个阶段进行。第一阶段包括五组,用于测量开路电位(OCP)和电流(I),而第二阶段包括六组,仅用于测量电流。
计算所获得的开路电位(OCP)和电流(I)值的均值、标准差和范围。通过方差分析对结果进行统计分析。在第一阶段,不锈钢弓丝记录的平均开路电位较高,其次是β钛弓丝、热激活镍钛弓丝、激光切割托槽和金属注射成型托槽。在充气的磷酸盐缓冲盐溶液中,各实验组记录的平均开路电位差异具有统计学意义。金属注射成型不锈钢托槽的电流(I)值显著高于所有其他材料。第二阶段结果表明,在弓丝 - 托槽 - 结扎丝组合形成的配对中,托槽对总电流的产生贡献更大,因为测试的两种托槽之间的电流存在显著差异,而三种弓丝之间则无显著差异。金属注射成型托槽的电流显著高于激光切割托槽。当与热激活镍钛弓丝一起使用时,金属注射成型托槽记录的平均电流(I)最高,而当与β钛弓丝一起使用时,激光切割托槽记录的平均电流(I)最低。
本研究得出结论,托槽是决定电流(I)的最重要因素。与激光切割托槽相比,金属注射成型托槽记录的平均电流(I)更高。在三种弓丝中,热激活镍钛丝记录的平均电流(I)更高,其次分别是不锈钢丝和β钛丝。当组合在一起时,金属注射成型托槽与热激活镍钛弓丝一起使用时记录的平均电流(I)最高,而激光切割托槽与β钛弓丝一起使用时记录的平均电流(I)最低。