Suppr超能文献

家长对儿童牙科中使用的行为管理技术的接受程度及其与家长牙科焦虑和经历的关系。

Parental acceptance of behaviour-management techniques used in paediatric dentistry and its relation to parental dental anxiety and experience.

作者信息

Boka V, Arapostathis K, Vretos N, Kotsanos N

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloníki, Greece,

出版信息

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014 Oct;15(5):333-9. doi: 10.1007/s40368-014-0119-y. Epub 2014 Mar 28.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to examine the acceptance by Greek parents of nine behaviour-management techniques and its association with several possible confounding factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Following ethical approval, 106 parents whose 3- to 12-year-old children had been receiving treatment in a university postgraduate paediatric dental clinic, and 123 parents of children from a private paediatric dental practice agreed to participate.

METHODS

After being shown a video with nine behaviour-management techniques, parents rated the acceptance of each technique on a 0-10 scale. They were then asked to complete a questionnaire about demographics, their previous dental experience and dental anxiety (modified Corah dental anxiety scale).

RESULTS

The best accepted technique was tell-show-do (9.76 ± 0.69), followed by parental presence/absence (PPA) technique (7.83 ± 3.06) and nitrous oxide inhalation sedation (7.09 ± 3.02). The least accepted techniques were passive restraint (4.21 ± 3.84) and general anaesthesia (4.21 ± 4.02). No correlations were found between acceptance of any individual management technique and parental age, gender, income, education, dental experience and dental anxiety or the child's age, gender and dental experience. Parents whose children had been treated at the University clinic had lower income and educational levels, and rated passive restraint, oral sedation and general anaesthesia higher than those from the private practice. When the parents were specifically asked to choose between general anaesthesia over any of the active or passive restraint, hand-over-mouth and voice control techniques, 10% preferred general anaesthesia, and these parents reported statistically significant more negative dental experience but not higher dental anxiety.

STATISTICS

Statistical significance of differences was explored using the Tukey-Kramer method.

CONCLUSION

There was no correlation between parental dental experience and dental anxiety and the acceptance of any specific behaviour-management technique. However, parents with negative dental experience would prefer general anaesthesia over any of active or passive restraint, hand-over-mouth and voice control techniques. PPA is a highly acceptable technique for Greek parents.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查希腊父母对九种行为管理技术的接受程度及其与若干可能的混杂因素之间的关联。

研究设计

在获得伦理批准后,106名3至12岁孩子在大学研究生儿科牙科诊所接受治疗的父母,以及123名来自私立儿科牙科诊所孩子的父母同意参与研究。

方法

在观看了一段包含九种行为管理技术的视频后,父母们以0至10分的评分标准对每种技术的接受程度进行评分。然后,他们被要求填写一份关于人口统计学、他们以前的牙科经历和牙科焦虑(改良的科拉牙科焦虑量表)的问卷。

结果

最被接受的技术是告知-展示-操作(9.76±0.69),其次是父母在场/不在场(PPA)技术(7.83±3.06)和氧化亚氮吸入镇静(7.09±3.02)。最不被接受的技术是被动约束(4.21±3.84)和全身麻醉(4.21±4.02)。未发现任何一种个体管理技术的接受程度与父母的年龄、性别、收入、教育程度、牙科经历和牙科焦虑,或孩子的年龄、性别和牙科经历之间存在相关性。孩子在大学诊所接受治疗的父母收入和教育水平较低,对被动约束、口服镇静和全身麻醉的评分高于私立诊所的父母。当父母被特别要求在全身麻醉与任何主动或被动约束、捂嘴和语音控制技术之间进行选择时,10%的父母更喜欢全身麻醉,并且这些父母报告的负面牙科经历在统计学上显著更多,但牙科焦虑并不更高。

统计学方法

使用Tukey-Kramer方法探讨差异的统计学显著性。

结论

父母的牙科经历和牙科焦虑与任何特定行为管理技术的接受程度之间没有相关性。然而,有负面牙科经历的父母比起任何主动或被动约束、捂嘴和语音控制技术,更喜欢全身麻醉。PPA对希腊父母来说是一种高度可接受的技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验