Suppr超能文献

“早期干预不是一种选择,而是一种必要”:从实施促进因素中学习以及在英格兰快速扩大一项早期干预饮食失调项目所面临的挑战。

"Early intervention isn't an option, it's a necessity": learning from implementation facilitators and challenges from the rapid scaling of an early intervention eating disorders programme in England.

作者信息

Hyam Lucy, Torkelson Claire, Richards Katie, Semple Amy, Allen Karina L, Owens Jill, Jackson Aileen, Semple Laura, Glennon Danielle, Di Clemente Giulia, Schmidt Ulrike

机构信息

Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Psychosis Studies, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Health Serv. 2024 Jan 18;3:1253966. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1253966. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The First Episode Rapid Early Intervention for Eating Disorders (FREED) service has shown promising outcomes for young people with an eating disorder, leading to national scaling and implementation across England. Between 2020 and 2023, the national implementation of FREED was supported by the Academic Health Science Networks (AHSNs), which are publicly funded organisations with the mission to spread innovations at scale and pace. This study aimed to investigate the views and experiences of AHSN programme leads on the national roll-out of FREED and the perceived sustainability of the model.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 programme leads across the AHSNs with direct experience supporting the national implementation of FREED. Thematic analysis was adopted using a critical realist approach. Initial sub-themes were inductively generated and then organised under seven larger themes representing the domains of the Non-adoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework. Each sub-theme was classified as a facilitator and/or barrier and then each larger theme/domain was assessed for its complexity (simple, complicated, complex). Data analysis revealed 28 sub-themes, 10 identified as facilitators, 13 as barriers, and five as both. Two domains were classed as simple, three as complicated, and two as complex. Sub-themes ranged from illness-related complexities to organisational pressures. Key facilitators included a high-value proposition for FREED and a supportive network. Key barriers included staffing issues and illness-related factors that challenge early intervention.

DISCUSSION

Participants described broad support for FREED but desired sustained investment for continued provision and improving implementation fidelity. Future development areas raised by participants included enlarging the evidence base for early intervention, increasing associated training opportunities, and widening the reach of FREED. Results offer learning for early intervention in eating disorders and the scaling of new health initiatives.

摘要

引言

饮食失调首次发作快速早期干预(FREED)服务已在患有饮食失调症的年轻人中显示出良好的效果,促使该服务在全国范围内推广并在英格兰各地实施。2020年至2023年期间,学术健康科学网络(AHSN)支持了FREED在全国的实施,AHSN是由公共资金资助的组织,其使命是以一定规模和速度推广创新。本研究旨在调查AHSN项目负责人对FREED全国推广的看法和经验,以及该模式的可持续性。

方法与结果

对AHSN中13位直接参与支持FREED全国实施的项目负责人进行了半结构化访谈。采用批判性现实主义方法进行主题分析。最初通过归纳法生成子主题,然后将其组织在七个更大的主题下,这些主题代表了非采用、放弃以及扩大规模、传播和可持续性挑战(NASSS)框架的领域。每个子主题被归类为促进因素和/或障碍,然后对每个更大的主题/领域的复杂性(简单、复杂、极复杂)进行评估。数据分析揭示了28个子主题,其中10个被确定为促进因素,13个为障碍,5个既是促进因素又是障碍。两个领域被归类为简单,三个为复杂,两个为极复杂。子主题涵盖从疾病相关的复杂性到组织压力等方面。关键促进因素包括FREED的高价值主张和支持性网络。关键障碍包括人员配备问题以及挑战早期干预的疾病相关因素。

讨论

参与者表示对FREED广泛支持,但希望持续投入资金以继续提供服务并提高实施的保真度。参与者提出的未来发展领域包括扩大早期干预的证据基础、增加相关培训机会以及扩大FREED的覆盖范围。研究结果为饮食失调的早期干预和新健康举措的推广提供了经验教训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/871b/10830832/36956df4908a/frhs-03-1253966-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验