• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Interventions to promote household waste segregation: A systematic review.促进家庭垃圾分类的干预措施:一项系统综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 11;10(2):e24332. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24332. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
Impact of social protection on gender equality in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of reviews.社会保护对低收入和中等收入国家性别平等的影响:一项综述的系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 May 25;18(2):e1240. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1240. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Nutritional interventions for preventing stunting in children (birth to 59 months) living in urban slums in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).针对低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)城市贫民窟中出生至59个月大儿童预防发育迟缓的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD011695. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011695.pub2.
8
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
9
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
10
Influencing household-level waste-sorting and composting behaviour: What works? A systematic review (1995-2020) of waste management interventions.影响家庭垃圾分类和堆肥行为的因素:什么方法有效?对 1995 年至 2020 年期间垃圾管理干预措施的系统评价
Waste Manag Res. 2021 Jul;39(7):892-909. doi: 10.1177/0734242X20985608. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of peer and instructor training techniques on waste separation behavior at source amongst female students in Iran.伊朗女学生源头垃圾分类行为中同伴与教师培训技巧的比较
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 26;15(1):10480. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93711-0.
2
In-depth analysis to develop a social marketing model to promote women's participation in waste segregation behaviour: A qualitative study.深入分析以构建促进女性参与垃圾分类行为的社会营销模式:一项定性研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 23;10(7):e28690. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28690. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamics of Household Waste Segregation Behaviour in Urban Community in Ujjain, India: A Framework Analysis.印度乌贾因市区社区家庭垃圾分类行为动态:框架分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;19(12):7321. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127321.
2
How Does Social Capital Affect Residents' Waste-Separation Behavior? Evidence from China.社会资本如何影响居民的垃圾分类行为?来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 15;19(6):3469. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063469.
3
Persuasive communication in medical decision-making during consultations with patients with limited health literacy in hospital-based palliative care.在医院姑息治疗中与健康素养有限的患者进行咨询时的医学决策中的说服性沟通。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 May;105(5):1130-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
Influencing household-level waste-sorting and composting behaviour: What works? A systematic review (1995-2020) of waste management interventions.影响家庭垃圾分类和堆肥行为的因素:什么方法有效?对 1995 年至 2020 年期间垃圾管理干预措施的系统评价
Waste Manag Res. 2021 Jul;39(7):892-909. doi: 10.1177/0734242X20985608. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
6
The effect direction plot revisited: Application of the 2019 Cochrane Handbook guidance on alternative synthesis methods.效果方向图再探:2019 年 Cochrane 手册关于替代综合方法的指导应用。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jan;12(1):29-33. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1458. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
7
Investigation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of Tehranian women apropos of reducing, reusing, recycling, and recovery of urban solid waste.德黑兰女性关于减少、再利用、再循环和回收城市固体废物的知识、态度和实践调查。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jul 2;192(7):481. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08445-5.
8
The effect of policy instruments on rural households' solid waste separation behavior and the mediation of perceived value using SEM.政策工具对农村家庭固体废物分类行为的影响及感知价值的中介作用——基于 SEM 的分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(16):19398-19409. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08410-2. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
9
A reexamination on how behavioral interventions can promote household action to limit climate change.关于行为干预如何促进家庭采取行动限制气候变化的重新审视。
Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 14;11(1):918. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14653-x.
10
Households' behavior and social-environmental aspects of using bag dustbin for waste recovery in Tehran.德黑兰家庭使用垃圾袋回收垃圾的行为及社会环境因素
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2019 Dec 18;17(2):1067-1076. doi: 10.1007/s40201-019-00421-7. eCollection 2019 Dec.

促进家庭垃圾分类的干预措施:一项系统综述。

Interventions to promote household waste segregation: A systematic review.

作者信息

Trushna Tanwi, Krishnan Kavya, Soni Rachana, Singh Surya, Kalyanasundaram Madhanraj, Sidney Annerstedt Kristi, Pathak Ashish, Purohit Manju, Stålsby Lundbog Cecilia, Sabde Yogesh, Atkins Salla, Sahoo Krushna C, Rousta Kamran, Diwan Vishal

机构信息

Division of Environmental Health and Epidemiology, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal, 462030, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Department of Environmental Monitoring and Exposure Assessment (Water & Soil), ICMR-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal, 462030, Madhya Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jan 11;10(2):e24332. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24332. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24332
PMID:38304833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10831609/
Abstract

Waste segregation at source, particularly at the household level, is an integral component of sustainable solid waste management, which is a critical public health issue. Although multiple interventions have been published, often with contradictory findings, few authors have conducted a comprehensive systematic synthesis of the published literature. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review to synthesize all published interventions conducted in any country in the world which targeted household-level waste segregation with or without additional focus on recycling or composting. Following PRISMA guidelines, Web of Science, Medline, Global Health, and Google Scholar were searched using a search strategy created by combining the keywords 'Waste', 'Segregation', and 'Household'. Two-stage blinded screening and consensus-based conflict resolution were done, followed by quality assessment, data extraction, and narrative synthesis. 8555 articles were identified through the database searches and an additional 196 through grey literature and citation searching. After excluding 2229 duplicates and screening title abstracts of 6522 articles, 283 full texts were reviewed, and 78 publications reporting 82 intervention studies were included in the data synthesis. High methodological heterogeneity was seen, excluding the possibility of a meta-analysis. Most (n = 60) of the interventions were conducted in high-income countries. Interventions mainly focused on information provision. However, differences in the content of information communicated and mode of delivery have not been extensively studied. Finally, our review showed that the comparison of informational interventions with provision of incentives and infrastructural modifications needs to be explored in-depth. Future studies should address these gaps and, after conducting sufficient formative research, should aim to design their interventions following the principles of behaviour change.

摘要

源头垃圾分类,尤其是家庭层面的垃圾分类,是可持续固体废物管理不可或缺的组成部分,而可持续固体废物管理是一个关键的公共卫生问题。尽管已经发表了多项干预措施,但其结果往往相互矛盾,很少有作者对已发表的文献进行全面系统的综合分析。因此,我们进行了一项系统综述,以综合世界上任何国家开展的所有已发表的干预措施,这些措施以家庭层面的垃圾分类为目标,无论是否额外关注回收利用或堆肥。遵循PRISMA指南,我们使用由“废物”、“分类”和“家庭”这几个关键词组合而成的搜索策略,对科学网、医学数据库、全球健康数据库和谷歌学术进行了搜索。我们进行了两阶段的盲态筛选和基于共识的冲突解决,随后进行质量评估、数据提取和叙述性综合分析。通过数据库搜索识别出8555篇文章,通过灰色文献和引文搜索又识别出196篇。在排除2229篇重复文章并筛选了6522篇文章的标题摘要后,我们对283篇全文进行了审查,数据综合分析纳入了78篇报告82项干预研究的出版物。我们发现方法学上存在高度异质性,排除了进行荟萃分析的可能性。大多数(n = 60)干预措施是在高收入国家开展的。干预措施主要集中在信息提供方面。然而,所传达信息的内容和传递方式的差异尚未得到广泛研究。最后,我们的综述表明,需要深入探讨信息干预与提供激励措施和基础设施改造之间的比较。未来的研究应填补这些空白,并在进行充分的形成性研究后,应遵循行为改变原则设计干预措施。