Trushna Tanwi, Krishnan Kavya, Soni Rachana, Singh Surya, Kalyanasundaram Madhanraj, Sidney Annerstedt Kristi, Pathak Ashish, Purohit Manju, Stålsby Lundbog Cecilia, Sabde Yogesh, Atkins Salla, Sahoo Krushna C, Rousta Kamran, Diwan Vishal
Division of Environmental Health and Epidemiology, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal, 462030, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Department of Environmental Monitoring and Exposure Assessment (Water & Soil), ICMR-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal, 462030, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 11;10(2):e24332. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24332. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
Waste segregation at source, particularly at the household level, is an integral component of sustainable solid waste management, which is a critical public health issue. Although multiple interventions have been published, often with contradictory findings, few authors have conducted a comprehensive systematic synthesis of the published literature. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review to synthesize all published interventions conducted in any country in the world which targeted household-level waste segregation with or without additional focus on recycling or composting. Following PRISMA guidelines, Web of Science, Medline, Global Health, and Google Scholar were searched using a search strategy created by combining the keywords 'Waste', 'Segregation', and 'Household'. Two-stage blinded screening and consensus-based conflict resolution were done, followed by quality assessment, data extraction, and narrative synthesis. 8555 articles were identified through the database searches and an additional 196 through grey literature and citation searching. After excluding 2229 duplicates and screening title abstracts of 6522 articles, 283 full texts were reviewed, and 78 publications reporting 82 intervention studies were included in the data synthesis. High methodological heterogeneity was seen, excluding the possibility of a meta-analysis. Most (n = 60) of the interventions were conducted in high-income countries. Interventions mainly focused on information provision. However, differences in the content of information communicated and mode of delivery have not been extensively studied. Finally, our review showed that the comparison of informational interventions with provision of incentives and infrastructural modifications needs to be explored in-depth. Future studies should address these gaps and, after conducting sufficient formative research, should aim to design their interventions following the principles of behaviour change.
源头垃圾分类,尤其是家庭层面的垃圾分类,是可持续固体废物管理不可或缺的组成部分,而可持续固体废物管理是一个关键的公共卫生问题。尽管已经发表了多项干预措施,但其结果往往相互矛盾,很少有作者对已发表的文献进行全面系统的综合分析。因此,我们进行了一项系统综述,以综合世界上任何国家开展的所有已发表的干预措施,这些措施以家庭层面的垃圾分类为目标,无论是否额外关注回收利用或堆肥。遵循PRISMA指南,我们使用由“废物”、“分类”和“家庭”这几个关键词组合而成的搜索策略,对科学网、医学数据库、全球健康数据库和谷歌学术进行了搜索。我们进行了两阶段的盲态筛选和基于共识的冲突解决,随后进行质量评估、数据提取和叙述性综合分析。通过数据库搜索识别出8555篇文章,通过灰色文献和引文搜索又识别出196篇。在排除2229篇重复文章并筛选了6522篇文章的标题摘要后,我们对283篇全文进行了审查,数据综合分析纳入了78篇报告82项干预研究的出版物。我们发现方法学上存在高度异质性,排除了进行荟萃分析的可能性。大多数(n = 60)干预措施是在高收入国家开展的。干预措施主要集中在信息提供方面。然而,所传达信息的内容和传递方式的差异尚未得到广泛研究。最后,我们的综述表明,需要深入探讨信息干预与提供激励措施和基础设施改造之间的比较。未来的研究应填补这些空白,并在进行充分的形成性研究后,应遵循行为改变原则设计干预措施。