Hetherington M, Teo K K, Haennel R, Greenwood P, Rossall R E, Kappagoda T
Eur Heart J. 1985 Dec;6(12):1016-24. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061804.
Invasive studies in patients with left ventricular dysfunction show that data at rest (e.g. ejection fraction-EF) are poor predictors of the changes in cardiac output (CO) which occur with exercise. This investigation was undertaken to determine whether impedance cardiography could be used in such patients to assess CO response to exercise. The method was compared with the direct Fick method. Over a range of COs between 4 and 18 min-1 there was no systematic error. Reproducibility for CO over one week was highly significant (r = 0.94; P less than 0.001). Impedance cardiography was incorporated into routine exercise testing on a bicycle ergometer for a group of 15 patients (mean age 53.2 +/- 3.0 yrs, SEM) who had sustained a major myocardial infarct 6 to 12 months previously, (EF 38.1 +/- 3.5%, SEM). CO was measured at the end of each 3-min stage. In eight patients (EF 40.0 +/- 3.4%, SEM) CO response was abnormal with either a decrease or a failure to increase with increasing workloads. Conventional end-points i.e. angina, attainment of 85% of predicted maximum heart rate, abnormal blood pressure response or excessive dyspnoea did not indicate consistently a need to terminate the test. It is suggested that impedance cardiography is a useful non-invasive method of evaluating patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
对左心室功能不全患者进行的侵入性研究表明,静息状态下的数据(如射血分数-EF)并不能很好地预测运动时心输出量(CO)的变化。本研究旨在确定阻抗心动图是否可用于此类患者以评估运动时的CO反应。将该方法与直接Fick法进行了比较。在4至18分钟-1的CO范围内,没有系统误差。一周内CO的重复性非常显著(r = 0.94;P小于0.001)。对一组15名患者(平均年龄53.2±3.0岁,标准误)进行了阻抗心动图检查,并将其纳入自行车测力计的常规运动测试中,这些患者在6至12个月前发生了严重心肌梗死(EF 38.1±3.5%,标准误)。在每个3分钟阶段结束时测量CO。8名患者(EF 40.0±3.4%,标准误)的CO反应异常,随着工作量增加,CO要么降低,要么没有增加。传统的终点指标,即心绞痛、达到预测最大心率的85%、异常的血压反应或过度呼吸困难,并不一致地表明需要终止测试。建议阻抗心动图是评估左心室功能不全患者的一种有用的非侵入性方法。