• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内血栓切除术治疗不适合 DAWN 和 DEFUSE-3 的急性缺血性脑卒中患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Endovascular thrombectomy for DAWN- and DEFUSE-3 ineligible acute ischemic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Neurol. 2024 May;271(5):2230-2237. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12198-3. Epub 2024 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12198-3
PMID:38308162
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy (EVT) has been proven beneficial for treating acute ischemic strokes (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Recent trials of DAWN and DEFUSE-3 have extended the treatment window to 6-24 h, sparking investigations into EVT outcomes for patients not eligible for DAWN/DEFUSE-3 criteria.

PURPOSE

To assess the outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) for late-window anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute ischemic stroke patients, comparing DAWN/DEFUSE-3 eligible (DD) and ineligible (NDND) groups.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined EVT outcomes for patients with late-window anterior circulation LVO beyond 6 h. We categorized patients as DAWN/DEFUSE-3 eligible (DD) and ineligible (NDND). Our search covered PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. A total of 464 records were initially identified. After duplicate removal, 298 studies were screened. Nine studies were included and analyzed. Our analysis focused on study characteristics, baseline comparisons, risk of bias, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics showed comparable age, gender, most comorbidities, NIHSS score, and ASPECTS between DAWN/DEFUSE-3 eligible (DD) and ineligible (NDND) patients. NDND patients' history showed a higher rate of atrial fibrillation and larger infarct volumes on baseline imaging. Successful reperfusion rates (TICI 2b-3) were similar between DD and NDND with 354 out of 469 in the DD group and 364 out of 459 in the NDND group (OR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.40, 1.84; p = 0.689), though with significant heterogeneity (I = 73%; P = 0.002). The proportion of patients with distal occlusions was significantly higher in the NDND group as compared to the DD group (137 (39.4%) of 347 patients versus 47 (11%) of 428 patients, respectively), with significant heterogeneity across studies (I = 85%, p = 0.023). Functional independence at 90 days (mRS 0-2) showed no significant difference between groups with 259 out of 802 in the DD group and 197 out of 668 in the NDND group (OR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.77, 1.63; p = 0.552) but also exhibited notable heterogeneity (I = 46%, p = 0.063). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates were lower in DD with 14 out of 309 in the DD group and 47 out of 400 in NDND group (OR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.25, 0.93; p = 0.029) as compared to the NDND patients, showing no heterogeneity (I = 0%, p = 0.552). 90-day mortality was lower in DD with 43 out of 304 in the DD group and 107 out of 399 in the NDND group (OR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.37, 0.82; p = 0.004) as compared to NDND patients, with no significant heterogeneity (I = 0%, p = 0.536).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates equivalent rates of functional independence between DD and NDND patients. However, the high proportion of distal occlusions and higher rates of sICH and mortality in NDND patients suggest caution in offering mechanical thrombectomy to DAWN/DEFUSE-3 ineligible patients. A more flexible approach to EVT eligibility criteria could benefit select patients in real-world practice. Nonetheless, further research is needed to identify which patients would benefit from expanded EVT eligibility criteria.

摘要

背景

血管内治疗(EVT)已被证明对治疗大血管闭塞(LVO)的急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)有益。最近的 DAWN 和 DEFUSE-3 试验将治疗时间窗延长至 6-24 小时,引发了对不符合 DAWN/DEFUSE-3 标准的患者进行 EVT 治疗的结果的研究。

目的

评估晚期前循环大血管闭塞(LVO)急性缺血性脑卒中患者血管内治疗(EVT)的结果,比较 DAWN/DEFUSE-3 符合(DD)和不符合(NDND)标准的患者。

方法

本系统评价和荟萃分析检查了超过 6 小时的晚期前循环 LVO 患者的 EVT 结果。我们将患者分为 DAWN/DEFUSE-3 符合(DD)和不符合(NDND)组。我们的检索涵盖了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Scopus。最初共确定了 464 条记录。重复记录去除后,筛选了 298 项研究。纳入了 9 项研究进行分析。我们的分析重点是研究特征、基线比较、偏倚风险和结果。

结果

基线特征显示,DAWN/DEFUSE-3 符合(DD)和不符合(NDND)患者的年龄、性别、大多数合并症、NIHSS 评分和 ASPECTS 相似。NDND 患者的病史显示,基线影像学上房颤发生率更高,梗死体积更大。在 DD 组中,354 例中有 354 例(86%)和 NDND 组中 364 例中有 364 例(459 例)(OR=0.86;95%CI 0.40,1.84;p=0.689)达到成功再灌注率(TICI 2b-3),尽管存在显著异质性(I=73%;P=0.002)。与 DD 组相比,NDND 组的远端闭塞比例明显更高(347 例中有 137 例(39.4%)和 428 例中有 47 例(11%)),研究间存在显著异质性(I=85%,p=0.023)。90 天功能独立性(mRS 0-2)在 DD 组中为 259 例中有 259 例(259 例中有 259 例)和 NDND 组中为 197 例中有 197 例(668 例中有 197 例)(OR=1.12;95%CI 0.77,1.63;p=0.552),但也存在显著异质性(I=46%,p=0.063)。DD 组的症状性颅内出血(sICH)发生率较低,309 例中有 14 例(4.9%),而 NDND 组 400 例中有 47 例(11.7%)(OR=0.49;95%CI 0.25,0.93;p=0.029),与 NDND 患者相比无差异,但不存在异质性(I=0%,p=0.552)。90 天死亡率在 DD 组中为 43 例中有 43 例(43 例中有 43 例)和 NDND 组中为 107 例中有 107 例(399 例中有 107 例)(OR=0.55;95%CI 0.37,0.82;p=0.004),与 NDND 患者相比无显著异质性(I=0%,p=0.536)。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,DD 和 NDND 患者的功能独立性率相当。然而,NDND 患者的远端闭塞比例较高,sICH 和死亡率较高,提示在不满足 DAWN/DEFUSE-3 标准的情况下,对机械血栓切除术应持谨慎态度。对 EVT 资格标准采取更灵活的方法可能有益于真实世界实践中的选择患者。然而,仍需要进一步研究以确定哪些患者将从扩大 EVT 资格标准中受益。

相似文献

1
Endovascular thrombectomy for DAWN- and DEFUSE-3 ineligible acute ischemic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管内血栓切除术治疗不适合 DAWN 和 DEFUSE-3 的急性缺血性脑卒中患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurol. 2024 May;271(5):2230-2237. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12198-3. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
2
Endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术联合与不联合静脉溶栓治疗的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 24;4(4):CD015721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015721.pub2.
3
Endovascular Thrombectomy for Carotid Pseudo-Occlusion in the Setting of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.血管内血栓切除术治疗急性缺血性脑卒中时的颈动脉假性闭塞:一项比较系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 9;45(9):1241-1245. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8268.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Beyond 24 Hours From Time Last Known Well: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.末次已知良好状态超过24小时的大血管闭塞性卒中血管内血栓切除术的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2025 May;197:123943. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123943. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
5
Transradial versus transfemoral artery access in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.经桡动脉与经股动脉入路在急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓中的应用:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Nov;246:108585. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108585. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
6
Efficacy and safety of intra-arterial thrombolysis after endovascular reperfusion for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.急性缺血性卒中血管内再灌注后动脉内溶栓的疗效与安全性:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Surg. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002404.
7
The risk of endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms.伴有未破裂颅内动脉瘤的大血管闭塞急性缺血性卒中患者进行血管内血栓切除术的风险。
BMC Neurol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04283-5.
8
Intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischemic stroke tandem occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current available literature.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于急性缺血性卒中串联闭塞静脉溶栓的比较:现有文献的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Mar;58(3):411-419. doi: 10.1007/s11239-025-03084-4. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
9
Endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting beyond 6 h after symptom onset: An international multicenter cohort study of the EVA-TRISP collaboration.症状发作超过6小时的急性缺血性卒中患者的血管内治疗:EVA-TRISP合作组的一项国际多中心队列研究
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Sep 8:23969873241277437. doi: 10.1177/23969873241277437.
10
Impact of pretreatment and early treatment with statins on safety and efficacy outcomes in patients after acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.他汀类药物预处理和早期治疗对接受血管内血栓切除术的急性缺血性卒中患者安全性和疗效结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuroradiology. 2025 Apr;67(4):995-1007. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03583-4. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a CT-based multi-omics nomogram for predicting hospital discharge outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy.基于CT的多组学列线图用于预测机械取栓术后出院结局的开发与验证
Front Neurosci. 2025 Aug 7;19:1643014. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1643014. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram incorporating automated collateral score and computed tomography perfusion parameters for patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy.纳入自动侧支循环评分和计算机断层扫描灌注参数的预后列线图在接受血管内血栓切除术的急性缺血性卒中患者中的开发与验证
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Aug 1;15(8):6738-6750. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1956. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Strokes: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.大型缺血性卒中的血管内血栓切除术:一项随机试验的实时系统评价和荟萃分析
J Stroke. 2023 May;25(2):214-222. doi: 10.5853/jos.2023.00752. Epub 2023 May 30.
2
Outcomes of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Following Thrombectomy for Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.取栓术后心房颤动患者的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2249993. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49993.
3
Association between Infarct Location and Hemorrhagic Transformation of Acute Ischemic Stroke following Successful Recanalization after Mechanical Thrombectomy.
Development and validation of a multi-omics hemorrhagic transformation model based on hyperattenuated imaging markers following mechanical thrombectomy.
基于机械取栓术后高密度成像标志物的多组学出血转化模型的建立与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 May 23;15(1):17990. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02056-1.
4
Diffusion-weighted imaging and the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (DWI-ASPECTS)-guided intra-arterial thrombectomy beyond 6 hours: feasibility, substantial efficacy, and acceptable safety.扩散加权成像与阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期CT评分(DWI-ASPECTS)指导下超过6小时的动脉内血栓切除术:可行性、显著疗效及可接受的安全性。
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):3131-3141. doi: 10.62347/GLEJ7849. eCollection 2025.
5
Leukoaraiosis severity and outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术的脑白质疏松严重程度与预后:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur Radiol. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11658-2.
6
In search of real-world cerebroprotection: An institutional perspective and review of the literature.探寻真实世界中的脑保护:机构视角及文献综述
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 May 5:15910199251337167. doi: 10.1177/15910199251337167.
机械取栓成功再通后梗死部位与急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓后出血性转化的关系。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Jan;44(1):54-59. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7742. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
Mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion between 6 and 24 h: outcome comparison of DEFUSE-3/DAWN eligible versus non-eligible patients.6-24 小时大血管闭塞的机械取栓:DEFUSE-3/DAWN 适合与不适合的患者的结局比较。
Int J Stroke. 2023 Jul;18(6):697-703. doi: 10.1177/17474930221140793. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
5
Trial of Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion.基底动脉闭塞性卒中发病 6 至 24 小时内取栓治疗的试验
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 13;387(15):1373-1384. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2207576.
6
Trial of Endovascular Treatment of Acute Basilar-Artery Occlusion.急性基底动脉闭塞血管内治疗试验。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 13;387(15):1361-1372. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206317.
7
Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Extended Time Window: Real-Life Experience in a High-Volume Center.急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓时间窗延长后的取栓治疗:大容量中心的真实世界经验。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Aug;31(8):106603. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106603. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
8
Real-World Cost-Effectiveness of Late Time Window Thrombectomy for Patients With Ischemic Stroke.缺血性中风患者晚期时间窗血栓切除术的真实世界成本效益
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 14;12:780894. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.780894. eCollection 2021.
9
Late Thrombectomy in Clinical Practice : Retrospective Application of DAWN/DEFUSE3 Criteria within the German Stroke Registry.临床实践中的晚期取栓:德国卒中登记处内 DAWN/DEFUSE3 标准的回顾性应用。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2021 Sep;31(3):799-810. doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01033-1. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
10
Predicting neuroimaging eligibility for extended-window endovascular thrombectomy.预测延长时间窗血管内血栓切除术的神经影像学入选标准
J Neurosurg. 2021 Feb 26;135(4):1100-1104. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.JNS20386. Print 2021 Oct 1.