Lau Josephine S, Kline-Simon Andrea H, Schmittdiel Julie A, Sterling Stacy A
Department of Adolescent Medicine, The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, USA.
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, USA.
J Eat Disord. 2024 Feb 2;12(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-00976-3.
Outpatient family-based treatment (FBT) is effective in treating restrictive eating disorders among adolescents. However, little is known about whether FBT reduces higher level of care (HLOC) utilization or if utilization of HLOC is associated with patient characteristics. This study examined associations between utilization of eating disorder related care (HLOC and outpatient treatment) and reported adherence to FBT and patient characteristics in a large integrated health system.
This retrospective cohort study examined 4101 adolescents who received care for restrictive eating disorders at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. A survey was sent to each medical center to identify treatment teams as high FBT adherence (hFBT) and low FBT adherence (lFBT). Outpatient medical and psychiatry encounters and HLOC, including medical hospitalizations and higher-level psychiatric care as well as patient characteristics were extracted from the EHR and examined over 12 months post-index.
2111 and 1990 adolescents were treated in the hFBT and lFBT, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, initial percent median BMI, and comorbid mental health diagnoses, there were no differences in HLOC or outpatient utilization between hFBT and lFBT. Females had higher odds of any utilization compared with males. Compared to White adolescents, Latinos/Hispanics had lower odds of HLOC utilization. Asian, Black, and Latino/Hispanic adolescents had lower odds of psychiatric outpatient care than Whites.
Reported FBT adherence was not associated with HLOC utilization in this sample. However, significant disparities across patient characteristics were found in the utilization of psychiatric care for eating disorders. More efforts are needed to understand treatment pathways that are accessible and effective for all populations with eating disorders.
门诊家庭式治疗(FBT)在治疗青少年限制性饮食失调方面有效。然而,对于FBT是否能减少更高水平护理(HLOC)的使用,或者HLOC的使用是否与患者特征相关,人们知之甚少。本研究在一个大型综合医疗系统中,考察了饮食失调相关护理(HLOC和门诊治疗)的使用与报告的FBT依从性及患者特征之间的关联。
这项回顾性队列研究考察了4101名在北加利福尼亚凯撒医疗集团接受限制性饮食失调护理的青少年。向每个医疗中心发送了一份调查问卷,以确定治疗团队为高FBT依从性(hFBT)和低FBT依从性(lFBT)。从电子健康记录(EHR)中提取门诊医疗和精神科会诊以及HLOC,包括住院治疗和更高水平的精神科护理以及患者特征,并在索引后12个月内进行考察。
分别有2111名和1990名青少年接受了hFBT和lFBT治疗。在调整了年龄、性别、种族/族裔、初始BMI中位数百分比和共病心理健康诊断后,hFBT和lFBT在HLOC或门诊使用方面没有差异。女性与男性相比,任何使用的几率更高。与白人青少年相比,拉丁裔/西班牙裔青少年使用HLOC的几率更低。亚裔、黑人和拉丁裔/西班牙裔青少年接受精神科门诊护理的几率低于白人。
在本样本中,报告的FBT依从性与HLOC使用无关。然而,在饮食失调的精神科护理使用方面,发现患者特征存在显著差异。需要做出更多努力,以了解对所有饮食失调人群都可及且有效的治疗途径。