Suppr超能文献

等待的代价:急诊重症老年患者住院前的不良结局。

Price for waiting: the adverse outcomes of boarding critically ill elderly medical patients in the emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, Kaohsiung City 802301, Taiwan.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City 813414, Taiwan.

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 2024 May 18;100(1184):391-398. doi: 10.1093/postmj/qgae006.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Boarding, the period in which a patient spends in the emergency department (ED) before admission, may be hazardous to critically ill patients, particularly the elderly. This study investigated the associations of boarding with hospital course, prognosis, and medical expenditure in older patients.

METHODS

From January 2019 to December 2021, the medical records of older patients (age ≥ 65) visiting the ED of a tertiary referral hospital who were admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) were retrospectively reviewed. Eligible patients were categorized into two groups according to boarding time with a cutoff set at 6 h. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, ICU/hospital length of stay, and total/average hospitalization cost. Subgroup analyses considered age and disease type.

RESULTS

Among 1318 ICU admissions from the ED, 36% were subjected to boarding for over 6 h. Prolonged boarding had a longer ICU (8.9 ± 8.8 vs. 11.2 ± 12.2 days, P < .001) and hospital (17.8 ± 20.1 vs. 22.8 ± 23.0 days, P < .001) stay, higher treatment cost (10.4 ± 13.9 vs. 13.2 ± 16.5 thousands of USD, P = .001), and hospital mortality (19% vs. 25% P = .020). Multivariate regression analysis showed a longer ICU stay in patients aged 65-79 (8.3 ± 8.4 vs. 11.8 ± 14.2 days, P < .001) and cardiology patients (6.9 ± 8.4 vs. 8.8 ± 9.7 days, P = .001). Besides, the treatment cost was also higher for both groups (10.4 ± 14.6 vs. 13.7 ± 17.7 thousands of USD, P = .004 and 8.4 ± 14.0 vs. 11.7 ± 16.6 thousands of USD, P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Extended ED boarding for critically ill medical patients over 65 years old was associated with negative outcomes, including longer ICU/hospital stays, higher treatment costs, and hospital mortality.

摘要

目的

在急诊部(ED)接受治疗的患者在入院前的这段时间称为留观期,这段时间可能对危重症患者,尤其是老年人造成危险。本研究旨在探讨留观期与老年患者的住院过程、预后和医疗支出之间的关联。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间因病情严重入住三级转诊医院内科重症监护病房(ICU)的老年(年龄≥65 岁)患者的 ED 病历。根据留观时间(截断值为 6 小时)将符合条件的患者分为两组。主要结局指标为院内死亡率、入住 ICU/医院的时间长度和总/平均住院费用。亚组分析考虑了年龄和疾病类型。

结果

在 1318 例从 ED 转入 ICU 的患者中,36%的患者留观时间超过 6 小时。较长的留观时间与 ICU(8.9±8.8 vs. 11.2±12.2 天,P<.001)和医院(17.8±20.1 vs. 22.8±23.0 天,P<.001)住院时间较长、治疗费用较高(10.4±13.9 vs. 13.2±16.5 千美元,P=.001)和较高的院内死亡率(19% vs. 25%,P=.020)相关。多变量回归分析显示,65-79 岁(8.3±8.4 vs. 11.8±14.2 天,P<.001)和心内科患者(6.9±8.4 vs. 8.8±9.7 天,P=.001)的 ICU 住院时间较长。此外,两组的治疗费用也较高(10.4±14.6 vs. 13.7±17.7 千美元,P=.004 和 8.4±14.0 vs. 11.7±16.6 千美元,P<.001)。

结论

对于 65 岁以上的危重症内科患者,ED 留观时间超过 6 小时与负面结局相关,包括 ICU/医院住院时间延长、治疗费用增加和院内死亡率升高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验