Wesarg-Menzel Christiane, Marheinecke Ruth, Staaks Janneke, Engert Veronika
Institute for Psychosocial Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Institute for Psychosocial Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2024 May;163:106976. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.106976. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
Researchers commonly assess the functioning of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis by measuring natural fluctuations of its end product cortisol throughout the day or in response to a standardized stressor. Although it is conceivable that an individual releasing relatively more cortisol when confronted with a laboratory stressor does the same in everyday life, inconsistencies remain in the literature regarding associations between diurnal cortisol parameters and cortisol stress responses. Hence, the current meta-analysis aggregated findings of 12 studies to examine overall associations of diurnal cortisol parameters (including total output, diurnal slope, and cortisol awakening response [CAR]) with cortisol stress reactivity and recovery in the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). There were no significant overall associations of total output, slope, or CAR with stress reactivity. Lower total diurnal cortisol output was significantly related to better stress recovery, whereas diurnal slope and CAR were unrelated to stress recovery. Moderation analyses revealed that associations between diurnal cortisol and cortisol stress responses were dependent on the computation method of cortisol parameters, questioning the convergence and validity of commonly employed measures of stress reactivity and recovery. Overall, it seems that we cannot predict characteristics of the diurnal cortisol rhythm from a one-time measure of stress reactivity in a standardized psychosocial laboratory paradigm.
研究人员通常通过测量下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺(HPA)轴终产物皮质醇在一天中的自然波动情况,或其对标准化应激源的反应,来评估该轴的功能。虽然可以想象,在面对实验室应激源时释放相对较多皮质醇的个体在日常生活中也会如此,但关于昼夜皮质醇参数与皮质醇应激反应之间的关联,文献中仍存在不一致之处。因此,当前的荟萃分析汇总了12项研究的结果,以检验昼夜皮质醇参数(包括总输出量、昼夜斜率和皮质醇觉醒反应[CAR])与在特里尔社会应激测试(TSST)中的皮质醇应激反应性和恢复之间的总体关联。总输出量、斜率或CAR与应激反应性之间没有显著的总体关联。较低的昼夜皮质醇总输出量与更好的应激恢复显著相关,而昼夜斜率和CAR与应激恢复无关。调节分析表明,昼夜皮质醇与皮质醇应激反应之间的关联取决于皮质醇参数的计算方法,这对常用的应激反应性和恢复测量方法的一致性和有效性提出了质疑。总体而言,似乎我们无法从标准化心理社会实验室范式中的一次性应激反应测量来预测昼夜皮质醇节律的特征。