Suppr超能文献

巴基斯坦妊娠期糖尿病患病率的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Pakistan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Health Research Institute, National Institute of Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 3;24(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06290-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A variety of screening tools and criteria are used for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). As a result, the prevalence rate of GDM varied from 4.41% to 57.90% among studies from Pakistan. Beside this disagreement, similar multi-centric studies, community surveys and pooled evidence were lacking from the country. Therefore, this first systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to measure the overall and subgroup pooled estimates of GDM and explore the methodological variations among studies for any inconsistency.

METHODS

Using the PRISMA guidelines, seventy studies were identified from PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and PakMediNet database. Of them, twenty-four relevant studies were considered for systematic review and nine eligible studies selected for meta-analysis. AXIS was used for measuring quality of reporting, I statistics for heterogeneity among studies and subgroups, funnel plot for reporting potential publication bias and forest plot for presenting pooled estimates.

RESULTS

The pooled sample of nine studies was 27,034 (126 - 12,450) pregnant women, of any gestational age, from all four provinces of Pakistan. Overall pooled estimate of GDM was 16.7% (95% CI 13.1 - 21.1). The highest subgroup pooled estimate of GDM observed in studies from Balochistan (35.8%), followed by Islamabad (23.9%), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (17.2%), Sindh (13.2%), and Punjab (11.4%). The studies that adopted 75g 2-h OGTT had a little lower pooled estimate (16.3% vs. 17.3%); and that adopted diagnostic cut-off values [≥ 92 (F), ≥ 180 (1-h) and ≥ 153 (2-h)] had a greater pooled estimate (25.4% vs. 15.8%). The studies that adopted Carpenter criteria demonstrated the highest subgroup pooled estimate of GDM (26.3%), after that IADPSG criteria (25.4%), and ADA criteria (23.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Along with poor quality of reporting, publishing in non-indexed journals and significant disagreement between studies, the prevalence rate of GDM is high in Pakistan. Consensus building among stakeholders for recommended screening methods; and continuous medical education of the physicians are much needed for a timely detection and treatment of GDM.

摘要

背景

用于诊断妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的筛查工具和标准多种多样。因此,来自巴基斯坦的研究中 GDM 的患病率从 4.41%到 57.90%不等。除了这种不一致之外,该国还缺乏类似的多中心研究、社区调查和汇总证据。因此,这项首次系统评价和荟萃分析旨在衡量 GDM 的总体和亚组汇总估计值,并探讨研究之间方法学差异的任何不一致性。

方法

使用 PRISMA 指南,从 PubMed、ScienceDirect、Google Scholar 和 PakMediNet 数据库中确定了 70 项研究。其中,有 24 项相关研究被纳入系统评价,9 项符合条件的研究被纳入荟萃分析。AXIS 用于评估报告质量,I 统计量用于评估研究之间的异质性和亚组,漏斗图用于报告潜在的发表偏倚,森林图用于呈现汇总估计值。

结果

9 项研究的汇总样本为 27034 名(126-12450)处于任何妊娠期的孕妇,来自巴基斯坦的四个省份。GDM 的总体汇总估计值为 16.7%(95%CI 13.1-21.1)。在来自俾路支省的研究中观察到 GDM 的最高亚组汇总估计值(35.8%),其次是伊斯兰堡(23.9%)、开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦(17.2%)、信德(13.2%)和旁遮普省(11.4%)。采用 75g 2 小时 OGTT 的研究的汇总估计值略低(16.3%比 17.3%);采用诊断截断值[≥92(F)、≥180(1 小时)和≥153(2 小时)]的研究的汇总估计值较高(25.4%比 15.8%)。采用 Carpenter 标准的研究显示出 GDM 的最高亚组汇总估计值(26.3%),其次是 IADPSG 标准(25.4%)和 ADA 标准(23.9%)。

结论

除了报告质量差、发表在非索引期刊上以及研究之间存在显著差异外,GDM 在巴基斯坦的患病率较高。利益相关者之间需要就推荐的筛查方法达成共识,并对医生进行持续的医学教育,以便及时发现和治疗 GDM。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3c9/10837918/e836179a6b17/12884_2024_6290_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验