• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Purpose definition as a crucial step for determining the legal basis under the GDPR: implications for scientific research.目的定义作为根据《通用数据保护条例》确定法律依据的关键步骤:对科学研究的影响
J Law Biosci. 2024 Feb 1;11(1):lsae001. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsae001. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
2
The significance of general data protection regulation in the compliant data contribution to the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.一般数据保护条例在符合规定的数据向欧洲胸外科协会数据库贡献方面的意义。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Sep 7;64(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad289.
3
DAISY: A Data Information System for accountability under the General Data Protection Regulation.DAISY:《通用数据保护条例》下的问责制数据信息系统。
Gigascience. 2019 Dec 1;8(12). doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz140.
4
The GDPR and the research exemption: considerations on the necessary safeguards for research biobanks.《通用数据保护条例》与研究豁免:对研究型生物库所需保障措施的思考。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Aug;27(8):1159-1167. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0386-5. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
5
Recommendations for Creating Codes of Conduct for Processing Personal Data in Biobanking Based on the GDPR art.40.基于《通用数据保护条例》第40条制定生物样本库中个人数据处理行为准则的建议。
Front Genet. 2021 Nov 12;12:711614. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.711614. eCollection 2021.
6
Federated Machine Learning, Privacy-Enhancing Technologies, and Data Protection Laws in Medical Research: Scoping Review.联邦机器学习、隐私增强技术和医疗研究中的数据保护法规:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 30;25:e41588. doi: 10.2196/41588.
7
Specific measures for data-intensive health research without consent: a systematic review of soft law instruments and academic literature.无同意数据密集型健康研究的具体措施:软性法律文书和学术文献的系统综述。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jan;32(1):21-30. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01471-0. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
8
Impossible, unknowable, accountable: Dramas and dilemmas of data law.不可能、未知、可问责:数据法的戏剧与困境。
Soc Stud Sci. 2019 Aug;49(4):503-530. doi: 10.1177/0306312719846557. Epub 2019 May 6.
9
Data Protection by Design Tool for Automated GDPR Compliance Verification Based on Semantically Modeled Informed Consent.基于语义建模的知情同意的自动化 GDPR 合规验证的数据保护设计工具。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 3;22(7):2763. doi: 10.3390/s22072763.
10
Record linkage of population-based cohort data from minors with national register data: a scoping review and comparative legal analysis of four European countries.基于人群的未成年人队列数据与国家登记数据的记录链接:四个欧洲国家的范围审查和比较法律分析
Open Res Eur. 2021 Sep 27;1:58. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.13689.2. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
An innovative Data sharing and Visualisation Tool (DAVIT) to improve domestic abuse data insight and multi-agency collaborations: An explorative study of acceptability, relevance and implementation considerations.一种用于改善家庭暴力数据洞察和多机构合作的创新数据共享与可视化工具(DAVIT):关于可接受性、相关性及实施考量的探索性研究
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2025 Mar 26;9:100603. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100603. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Regulating neural data processing in the age of BCIs: Ethical concerns and legal approaches.脑机接口时代对神经数据处理的规范:伦理考量与法律途径
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 28;11:20552076251326123. doi: 10.1177/20552076251326123. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

目的定义作为根据《通用数据保护条例》确定法律依据的关键步骤:对科学研究的影响

Purpose definition as a crucial step for determining the legal basis under the GDPR: implications for scientific research.

作者信息

Becker Regina, Chokoshvili Davit, Thorogood Adrian, Dove Edward S, Molnár-Gábor Fruzsina, Ziaka Alexandra, Tzortzatou-Nanopoulou Olga, Comandè Giovanni

机构信息

Luxembourg National Data Service, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

Terry Fox Research Institute, V5Z 1L3 Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Law Biosci. 2024 Feb 1;11(1):lsae001. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsae001. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.

DOI:10.1093/jlb/lsae001
PMID:38313429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10834358/
Abstract

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union, which became applicable in 2018, contains a new accountability principle. Under this principle, controllers (ie parties determining the purposes and the means of the processing of personal data) are responsible for ensuring and demonstrating the overall compliance with the GDPR. However, interpretive uncertainties of the GDPR mean that controllers must exercise considerable judgement in designing and implementing an appropriate compliance strategy, making GDPR compliance both complex and resource-intensive. In this article, we provide conceptual clarity around GDPR compliance with respect to one core aspect of the law: the determination and relevance of the purpose of personal data processing. We derive from the GDPR's text concrete requirements for purpose specification, which we subsequently apply to the area of secondary use of personal data for scientific research. We offer guidance for correctly specifying purposes of data processing under different research scenarios. To illustrate the practical necessity of purpose specification for GDPR compliance, we then show how our proposed approach can enable controllers to meet their compliance obligations, using the example of the overarching GDPR principle of lawfulness to highlight the relevance of purpose specification for the identification of a suitable legal basis.

摘要

欧盟的《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)于2018年开始适用,其中包含一项新的问责原则。根据这一原则,控制者(即决定个人数据处理目的和方式的各方)有责任确保并证明全面遵守GDPR。然而,GDPR的解释不确定性意味着控制者在设计和实施适当的合规策略时必须行使相当大的判断力,这使得GDPR合规既复杂又耗费资源。在本文中,我们围绕GDPR合规在该法律的一个核心方面提供概念上的清晰性:个人数据处理目的的确定及其相关性。我们从GDPR的文本中得出目的规范的具体要求,随后将其应用于个人数据用于科学研究的二次使用领域。我们为在不同研究场景下正确确定数据处理目的提供指导。为了说明目的规范对于GDPR合规的实际必要性,我们接着以GDPR的首要合法性原则为例,展示我们提出的方法如何使控制者履行其合规义务,以突出目的规范对于确定合适法律依据的相关性。