Kesavankutty Manu P, Panda Chinmaya, Karim Habib M R, Singha Subrata, Agrawal Sarita
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2024 Jan-Mar;18(1):23-30. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_378_23. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
Spinal anesthesia is the technique of choice for elective cesarean section with a prominent side effect of postspinal anesthesia hypotension (PSH). This needs an early prediction to avoid feto-maternal complication. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of perfusion index (PI) and inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) in the prediction of PSH.
Thirty parturients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) 1 and two undergoing cesarean delivery participated in the study. IVCCI, PI, baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), and heart rate (HR) were noted in the preoperative period. The fall of MBP by 20% from baseline or below 65 mm Hg was considered PSH. After spinal anesthesia, SBP, DBP, MBP, and HR were noted again for diagnosing PSH.
It did not show any statistical difference when comparing the PI between the PSH and non-PSH groups in both the PSH definition groups. IVCCI was significantly higher when PSH was considered MBP <65 mm Hg ( = 0.01). However, IVCCI was found to be statistically insignificant if PSH was considered a 20% reduction in baseline MBP. The correlation matrix between IVCCI and PI showed Pearson's r-value of 0.525, indicating a substantial relationship between the two ( = 0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis had shown that neither IVCCI nor PI was a good predictor of PSH in parturients for both definition groups for PSH.
Although there is a modest correlation between PI and IVCCI, both cannot be used to predict postspinal hypotension in parturients undergoing elective lower-segment cesarean section (LSCS).
脊髓麻醉是择期剖宫产的首选技术,但脊髓麻醉后低血压(PSH)是其突出的副作用。这需要早期预测以避免母婴并发症。本研究旨在评估灌注指数(PI)和下腔静脉塌陷指数(IVCCI)在预测PSH方面的诊断准确性。
30例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)为1级的产妇及2例接受剖宫产的产妇参与了本研究。术前记录IVCCI、PI、基础收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均血压(MBP)和心率(HR)。MBP较基础值下降20%或低于65 mmHg被视为PSH。脊髓麻醉后,再次记录SBP、DBP、MBP和HR以诊断PSH。
在两种PSH定义组中,PSH组与非PSH组的PI比较均未显示出任何统计学差异。当将PSH定义为MBP<65 mmHg时,IVCCI显著更高(P = 0.01)。然而,若将PSH定义为基础MBP下降20%,则IVCCI无统计学意义。IVCCI与PI之间的相关矩阵显示Pearson相关系数r值为0.525,表明两者之间存在显著关系(P = 0.003)。多因素逻辑回归分析表明,对于两种PSH定义组的产妇,IVCCI和PI均不是PSH的良好预测指标。
尽管PI与IVCCI之间存在适度相关性,但两者均不能用于预测择期下段剖宫产(LSCS)产妇的脊髓麻醉后低血压。