Nonlinearity in affect dynamics persists after accounting for the valence of daily-life events.

In recent years, increased attention has gone to studying nonlinear characteristics of affective time series. An example of such nonlinear features is multimodality-the presence of more than one mode in an affective time series-which might mark the presence of discrete-like transitions between one and another affective state. In an attempt to capture these nonlinear features, Loossens et al. (2020) proposed the Affective Ising Model (AIM) as a model of affect dynamics. This model was validated on daily-life data, but these data did not contain any information on potential environmental factors that might have influenced a participant's affective state. Unfortunately, this omission may have led to erroneously concluding that nonlinearity is a defining characteristic of the affective system, even when it is solely driven by extrinsic influences. To accommodate this limitation, we applied the AIM on daily-life data in which the valence of such external events was measured. Overall, we found that nonlinearity persisted after accounting for the valence of daily-life events, suggesting that nonlinearity is a defining characteristic of affect and should thus be accounted for. Interestingly, this effect was more pronounced for composite compared to single-item measures of affect. While in line with previous research, these results should be replicated in a larger, more representative sample. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).