Department of Psychology, The University of British Columbia.
Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University.
Health Psychol. 2020 Dec;39(12):1078-1088. doi: 10.1037/hea0001033. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
Experimental evidence suggests that inadequate sleep disrupts next-day affective processing and evokes greater stress reactivity. However, less research has focused on whether sleep predicts next-day affective reactivity to naturally occurring stressors and positive events in daily life, as well as the reversed direction of association (i.e., affective reactivity to daily events as predictors of subsequent sleep). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the within-person, bidirectional associations between nightly sleep duration and day-to-day fluctuations in affect related to stressors and positive events.
Adults ages 33-84 (N = 1,982, 57% female) in the U.S. National Study of Daily Experiences II reported sociodemographics and chronic conditions at baseline, then completed telephone interviews for 8 consecutive days about their sleep duration, daily stressors, positive events, and affect.
Prior-night sleep duration moderated the link between current-day events and positive affect, but not negative affect. Specifically, nights of shorter-than-usual sleep duration predicted more pronounced decreases in positive affect in response to daily stressors, as well as smaller increases in positive affect in response to daily positive events. Results for the reversed direction of association showed no evidence for affective reactivity to daily events as predictors of subsequent sleep duration. People with more chronic conditions were more reactive to positive events, particularly after nights of longer sleep.
Affective reactivity to daily stressors and positive events vary based upon sleep duration, such that sleep loss may amplify loss of positive affect on days with stressors, as well as reduce positive affective responsiveness to positive events. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
实验证据表明,睡眠不足会扰乱次日的情绪处理,并引发更大的应激反应。然而,较少的研究关注睡眠是否预测次日对日常生活中自然发生的应激源和积极事件的情绪反应,以及相反的关联方向(即对日常生活事件的情绪反应作为随后睡眠的预测指标)。本研究旨在评估夜间睡眠时间与与应激源和积极事件相关的每日情绪波动之间的个体内、双向关联。
美国国家日常体验研究 II 中的成年人(年龄 33-84 岁,57%为女性)在基线时报告了社会人口统计学和慢性疾病信息,然后连续 8 天通过电话访谈报告了他们的睡眠时间、每日应激源、积极事件和情绪。
前一晚的睡眠时间调节了当前事件与积极情绪之间的联系,但与消极情绪无关。具体来说,睡眠时间短于平常的夜晚会预测到对日常应激源的积极情绪明显下降,以及对日常积极事件的积极情绪增加较小。对于相反方向的关联,没有证据表明对日常事件的情绪反应可以预测随后的睡眠时间。患有更多慢性疾病的人对积极事件的反应更为强烈,尤其是在睡眠时间较长的夜晚之后。
对日常应激源和积极事件的情绪反应取决于睡眠时间,因此睡眠不足可能会加剧有应激源的日子里积极情绪的丧失,同时减少对积极事件的积极情绪反应。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。