Suppr超能文献

强脉冲光-光动力疗法治疗脂溢性皮炎的前瞻性、分割面、随机对照试验。

A prospective, split-face, randomized controlled trial of intense pulsed light-photodynamic therapy for seborrhea.

机构信息

Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States; Avera Medical Group Dermatology Aberdeen, Aberdeen, South Dakota 57401, United States.

出版信息

Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2024 Feb;45:103973. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.103973. Epub 2024 Feb 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Seborrhea poses a common cosmetic concern in adolescents and young adults, often accompanied by enlarged pores, and contributing to various skin conditions, including acne vulgaris and seborrheic dermatitis. At present, there is a lack of effective treatment for this problem, and the potential of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in reducing sebum remains inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

This exploratory, prospective, single-center, double-blinded, randomized split-face controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light-photodynamic therapy (IPL-PDT) versus IPL therapy for seborrhea.

METHODS

Participants with seborrhea underwent 3 times of IPL treatment (590 nm, 15-17 J/cm based on patient's tolerance) for one hemifacial part and IPL-PDT treatment for the other. Follow-up assessment was conducted up to 8 weeks after the final treatment.

RESULTS

Compared with single IPL treatment, IPL-PDT can significantly inhibit sebum secretion and decrease pore size. PDT group exhibited no additional damage to the skin barrier, with even lower transepidermal water loss (TEWL). Additionally, the PDT group showed superior improvement in scores of porphyrins, red areas, and ultraviolet (UV) spots. Both groups experienced only mild topical adverse effects, well tolerated by the participants.

CONCLUSION

IPL-PDT is a more effective method than IPL in the treatment of seborrhea, as well as on the improvement of the skin barrier function.

摘要

背景

皮脂溢出在青少年和年轻人中是一种常见的美容问题,常伴有毛孔粗大,并导致各种皮肤状况,包括寻常痤疮和脂溢性皮炎。目前,针对这一问题还缺乏有效的治疗方法,光动力疗法(PDT)减少皮脂的潜力仍存在争议。

目的

本探索性、前瞻性、单中心、双盲、随机对照Split-face 研究旨在比较强脉冲光-光动力疗法(IPL-PDT)与强脉冲光治疗皮脂溢的疗效和安全性。

方法

皮脂溢患者接受 3 次 IPL 治疗(590nm,基于患者耐受度的 15-17J/cm),一侧为半边脸 IPL 治疗,另一侧为 IPL-PDT 治疗。最后一次治疗后 8 周进行随访评估。

结果

与单次 IPL 治疗相比,IPL-PDT 能显著抑制皮脂分泌,缩小毛孔。PDT 组对皮肤屏障无额外损伤,甚至更低的经表皮水分丢失(TEWL)。此外,PDT 组在卟啉、红斑和紫外线(UV)斑的评分改善方面表现更佳。两组患者均仅有轻度的局部不良反应,参与者均能耐受。

结论

与 IPL 相比,IPL-PDT 是治疗皮脂溢以及改善皮肤屏障功能更有效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验