• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于光谱的定量超声成像处理技术:RF 与 IQ 方法的比较。

Spectral-based Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging Processing Techniques: Comparisons of RF Versus IQ Approaches.

机构信息

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

出版信息

Ultrason Imaging. 2024 Mar;46(2):75-89. doi: 10.1177/01617346231226224. Epub 2024 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1177/01617346231226224
PMID:38318705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10962227/
Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is an imaging technique which includes spectral-based parameterization. Typical spectral-based parameters include the backscatter coefficient (BSC) and attenuation coefficient slope (ACS). Traditionally, spectral-based QUS relies on the radio frequency (RF) signal to calculate the spectral-based parameters. Many clinical and research scanners only provide the in-phase and quadrature (IQ) signal. To acquire the RF data, the common approach is to convert IQ signal back into RF signal via mixing with a carrier frequency. In this study, we hypothesize that the performance, that is, accuracy and precision, of spectral-based parameters calculated directly from IQ data is as good as or better than using converted RF data. To test this hypothesis, estimation of the BSC and ACS using RF and IQ data from software, physical phantoms and in vivo rabbit data were analyzed and compared. The results indicated that there were only small differences in estimates of the BSC between when using the original RF, the IQ derived from the original RF and the RF reconverted from the IQ, that is, root mean square errors (RMSEs) were less than 0.04. Furthermore, the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) was calculated for ACS maps with a value greater than 0.96 for maps created using the original RF, IQ data and reconverted RF. On the other hand, the processing time using the IQ data compared to RF data were substantially less, that is, reduced by more than a factor of two. Therefore, this study confirms two things: (1) there is no need to convert IQ data back to RF data for conducting spectral-based QUS analysis, because the conversion from IQ back into RF data can introduce artifacts. (2) For the implementation of real-time QUS, there is an advantage to convert the original RF data into IQ data to conduct spectral-based QUS analysis because IQ data-based QUS can improve processing speed.

摘要

定量超声(QUS)是一种成像技术,包括基于光谱的参数化。典型的基于光谱的参数包括背散射系数(BSC)和衰减系数斜率(ACS)。传统上,基于光谱的 QUS 依赖于射频(RF)信号来计算基于光谱的参数。许多临床和研究扫描仪仅提供同相和正交(IQ)信号。为了获取 RF 数据,常用的方法是通过与载波频率混合将 IQ 信号转换回 RF 信号。在这项研究中,我们假设直接从 IQ 数据计算出的基于光谱的参数的性能(即准确性和精密度)与使用转换后的 RF 数据一样好或更好。为了验证这一假设,我们分析并比较了使用软件、物理体模和体内兔数据从 RF 和 IQ 数据估算 BSC 和 ACS 的结果。结果表明,使用原始 RF、从原始 RF 导出的 IQ 和从 IQ 重新转换的 RF 估算 BSC 之间仅存在微小差异,即均方根误差(RMSE)小于 0.04。此外,对于使用原始 RF、IQ 数据和重新转换的 RF 创建的 ACS 图,结构相似性指数度量(SSIM)的值大于 0.96。另一方面,与 RF 数据相比,使用 IQ 数据的处理时间大大减少,即减少了两倍以上。因此,本研究证实了两件事:(1)进行基于光谱的 QUS 分析时,无需将 IQ 数据转换回 RF 数据,因为从 IQ 数据转换回 RF 数据可能会引入伪影。(2)对于实时 QUS 的实现,将原始 RF 数据转换为 IQ 数据进行基于光谱的 QUS 分析具有优势,因为 IQ 数据的 QUS 可以提高处理速度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/0edf8180d5b9/nihms-1973234-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/277dcd5e923a/nihms-1973234-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/98d1a85b961f/nihms-1973234-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/b8f62923f7ad/nihms-1973234-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/faea1728fee6/nihms-1973234-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/41f24bf635d7/nihms-1973234-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/9372d72b58ea/nihms-1973234-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/59937cbf5220/nihms-1973234-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/0edf8180d5b9/nihms-1973234-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/277dcd5e923a/nihms-1973234-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/98d1a85b961f/nihms-1973234-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/b8f62923f7ad/nihms-1973234-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/faea1728fee6/nihms-1973234-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/41f24bf635d7/nihms-1973234-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/9372d72b58ea/nihms-1973234-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/59937cbf5220/nihms-1973234-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10962227/0edf8180d5b9/nihms-1973234-f0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Spectral-based Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging Processing Techniques: Comparisons of RF Versus IQ Approaches.基于光谱的定量超声成像处理技术:RF 与 IQ 方法的比较。
Ultrason Imaging. 2024 Mar;46(2):75-89. doi: 10.1177/01617346231226224. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
Techniques and evaluation from a cross-platform imaging comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters in an in vivo rodent fibroadenoma model.体内啮齿动物纤维腺瘤模型中定量超声参数跨平台成像比较的技术与评估
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013 Jul;60(7):1386-400. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2711.
3
Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.超声衰减和背向散射定量评估活体乳腺肿块。
Ultrason Imaging. 2013 Apr;35(2):146-61. doi: 10.1177/0161734613480281.
4
Characterizing Fatty Liver in vivo in Rabbits, Using Quantitative Ultrasound.应用定量超声技术对兔体内脂肪肝进行特征分析。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Aug;45(8):2049-2062. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.03.021. Epub 2019 May 8.
5
Method for estimating total attenuation from a spatial map of attenuation slope for quantitative ultrasound imaging.基于超声定量成像衰减斜率空间图谱估算总衰减的方法。
Ultrason Imaging. 2013 Apr;35(2):162-72. doi: 10.1177/0161734613478695.
6
In Vivo Validation of an In Situ Calibration Bead as a Reference for Backscatter Coefficient Calculation.体内原位校准珠验证作为反向散射系数计算的参考标准。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2024 Jun;50(6):833-842. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
7
Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference Reference-phantom Method.基于谱差参考体模法的超声衰减系数估计方差下限
Ultrason Imaging. 2017 May;39(3):151-171. doi: 10.1177/0161734616674329. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
8
Improving the statistics of quantitative ultrasound techniques with deformation compounding: an experimental study.利用变形复合提高定量超声技术的统计学性能:一项实验研究。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Dec;37(12):2066-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.09.008. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
9
Influences of Variability in Attenuation Compensation on the Estimation of Backscatter Coefficient of Median Nerves in Vivo.衰减补偿变异性对体内正中神经背向散射系数估计的影响
J Ultrasound Med. 2025 Jan;44(1):97-109. doi: 10.1002/jum.16585. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
10
Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound.定量超声综述:包络统计与背向散射系数成像及其对诊断超声的贡献
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2016 Feb;63(2):336-51. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2015.2513958. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Attenuation Estimation and Acoustic Characterization of Mouse Lymph Node Tumor Using High-frequency Ultrasound.使用高频超声对小鼠淋巴结肿瘤进行衰减估计和声学特征分析
Mol Imaging Biol. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s11307-025-02007-2.
2
Angular spatial compounding of diffraction corrected images improves ultrasound attenuation measurements.衍射校正图像的角向空间复合改善了超声衰减测量。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2025 Mar 1;157(3):1638-1649. doi: 10.1121/10.0036124.

本文引用的文献

1
Regularized Ultrasound Phantom-Free Local Attenuation Coefficient Slope (ACS) Imaging in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Tissues.正则化超声无仿射体局部衰减系数斜率(ACS)成像在均匀和非均匀组织中的应用。
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2022 Dec;69(12):3338-3352. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2022.3218920. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
2
Identifying and overcoming limitations with in situ calibration beads for quantitative ultrasound.识别并克服用于定量超声的原位校准微珠的局限性。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Apr;151(4):2701. doi: 10.1121/10.0010286.
3
Shear Wave Elastography and Quantitative Ultrasound as Biomarkers to Characterize Deep Vein Thrombosis In Vivo.
剪切波弹性成像和定量超声作为生物标志物用于体内深静脉血栓的特征描述。
J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Jul;41(7):1807-1816. doi: 10.1002/jum.15863. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
4
Quantitative ultrasound imaging of soft biological tissues: a primer for radiologists and medical physicists.软生物组织的定量超声成像:放射科医生和医学物理学家入门指南
Insights Imaging. 2021 Sep 9;12(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01071-w.
5
Full wave 3D inverse scattering transmission ultrasound tomography in the presence of high contrast.存在高对比度时的全波三维逆散射透射超声层析成像。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 19;10(1):20166. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76754-3.
6
Frequency-dependent attenuation reconstruction with an acoustic reflector.带声反射器的频率相关衰减重建。
Med Image Anal. 2021 Jan;67:101875. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101875. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
7
Challenges of conducting quantitative ultrasound with a multimodal optical imaging system.运用多模态光学成像系统进行定量超声检测所面临的挑战。
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Jan 26;66(3):035008. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abc93c.
8
Assessment of Hepatic Steatosis in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease by Using Quantitative US.应用定量超声评估非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者的肝脂肪变
Radiology. 2020 Apr;295(1):106-113. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191152. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
9
Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source.利用原位校准源估算反向散射系数。
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020 Feb;67(2):308-317. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2944305. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
10
Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation.声非线性对超声背散射系数估计的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Jul;146(1):85. doi: 10.1121/1.5115355.