Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London.
Epicentre/Mbarara Research Base, Mbarara, Uganda.
NEJM Evid. 2023 Sep;2(9):EVIDoa2300054. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300054. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
Shorter but effective tuberculosis treatment regimens would be of value to the tuberculosis treatment community. High-dose rifampicin has been associated with more rapid and secure lung sterilization and may enable shorter tuberculosis treatment regimens. METHODS: We randomly assigned adults who were given a diagnosis of rifampicin-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis to a 6-month control regimen, a similar 4-month regimen of rifampicin at 1200 mg/d (study regimen 1 [SR1]), or a 4-month regimen of rifampicin at 1800 mg/d (study regimen 2 [SR2]). Sputum specimens were collected at regular intervals. The primary end point was a composite of treatment failure and relapse in participants who were sputum smear positive at baseline. The noninferiority margin was 8 percentage points. Using a sequence of ordered hypotheses, noninferiority of SR2 was tested first. RESULTS: Between January 2017 and December 2020, 672 patients were enrolled in six countries, including 191 in the control group, 192 in the SR1 group, and 195 in the SR2 group. Noninferiority was not shown. Favorable responses rates were 93, 90, and 87% in the control, SR1, and SR2 groups, respectively, for a country-adjusted absolute risk difference of 6.3 percentage points (90% confidence interval, 1.1 to 11.5) comparing SR2 with the control group. The proportions of participants experiencing a grade 3 or 4 adverse event were 4.0, 4.5, and 4.4% in the control, SR1, and SR2 groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Four-month high-dose rifampicin regimens did not have dose-limiting toxicities or side effects but failed to meet noninferiority criteria compared with the standard 6-month control regimen for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. (Funded by the MRC/Wellcome Trust/DFID Joint Global Health Trials Scheme; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02581527.)
更短但有效的结核病治疗方案将对结核病治疗界具有重要意义。高剂量利福平与更快速和更安全的肺部杀菌作用有关,并且可能使结核病治疗方案更短。
我们将确诊为利福平敏感型肺结核的成年人随机分配至 6 个月的对照治疗方案、类似的利福平 1200mg/d(研究方案 1 [SR1])4 个月治疗方案或利福平 1800mg/d(研究方案 2 [SR2])4 个月治疗方案。定期采集痰标本。主要终点是基线时痰涂片阳性的参与者中治疗失败和复发的综合结果。非劣效性边界为 8 个百分点。通过一系列有序假设,首先检验了 SR2 的非劣效性。
2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月,在六个国家共招募了 672 名患者,包括对照组 191 例、SR1 组 192 例和 SR2 组 195 例。结果未显示非劣效性。对照组、SR1 组和 SR2 组的治疗反应率分别为 93%、90%和 87%,SR2 组与对照组相比,校正后的绝对风险差异为 6.3 个百分点(90%置信区间为 1.1 至 11.5)。对照组、SR1 组和 SR2 组发生 3 级或 4 级不良事件的比例分别为 4.0%、4.5%和 4.4%。
与标准的 6 个月对照治疗方案相比,4 个月的高剂量利福平方案并未出现剂量限制毒性或副作用,但未能达到非劣效性标准,用于治疗肺结核。(由 MRC/Wellcome Trust/DFID 联合全球健康试验计划资助;临床试验注册编号,NCT02581527。)