Suppr超能文献

使用独立的耳部脑电图设备进行局灶性发作检测。

Using a standalone ear-EEG device for focal-onset seizure detection.

作者信息

Joyner McGregor, Hsu Sheng-Hsiou, Martin Stephanie, Dwyer Jennifer, Chen Denise Fay, Sameni Reza, Waters Samuel H, Borodin Konstantin, Clifford Gari D, Levey Allan I, Hixson John, Winkel Daniel, Berent Jonathan

机构信息

NextSense Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.

Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Bioelectron Med. 2024 Feb 7;10(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s42234-023-00135-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Seizure detection is challenging outside the clinical environment due to the lack of comfortable, reliable, and practical long-term neurophysiological monitoring devices. We developed a novel, discreet, unobstructive in-ear sensing system that enables long-term electroencephalography (EEG) recording. This is the first study we are aware of that systematically compares the seizure detection utility of in-ear EEG with that of simultaneously recorded intracranial EEG. In addition, we present a similar comparison between simultaneously recorded in-ear EEG and scalp EEG.

METHODS

In this foundational research, we conducted a clinical feasibility study and validated the ability of the ear-EEG system to capture focal-onset seizures against 1255 hrs of simultaneous ear-EEG data along with scalp or intracranial EEG in 20 patients with refractory focal epilepsy (11 with scalp EEG, 8 with intracranial EEG, and 1 with both).

RESULTS

In a blinded, independent review of the ear-EEG signals, two epileptologists were able to detect 86.4% of the seizures that were subsequently identified using the clinical gold standard EEG modalities, with a false detection rate of 0.1 per day, well below what has been reported for ambulatory monitoring. The few seizures not detected on the ear-EEG signals emanated from deep within the mesial temporal lobe or extra-temporally and remained very focal, without significant propagation. Following multiple sessions of recording for a median continuous wear time of 13 hrs, patients reported a high degree of tolerance for the device, with only minor adverse events reported by the scalp EEG cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results demonstrate the potential of using ear-EEG to enable routine collection of complementary, prolonged, and remote neurophysiological evidence, which may permit real-time detection of paroxysmal events such as seizures and epileptiform discharges. This study suggests that the ear-EEG device may assist clinicians in making an epilepsy diagnosis, assessing treatment efficacy, and optimizing medication titration.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏舒适、可靠且实用的长期神经生理监测设备,在临床环境之外进行癫痫发作检测具有挑战性。我们开发了一种新颖、隐蔽、无阻碍的入耳式传感系统,可实现长期脑电图(EEG)记录。据我们所知,这是第一项系统比较入耳式EEG与同时记录的颅内EEG癫痫发作检测效用的研究。此外,我们还展示了同时记录的入耳式EEG与头皮EEG之间的类似比较。

方法

在这项基础研究中,我们进行了一项临床可行性研究,并针对20例难治性局灶性癫痫患者(11例有头皮EEG,8例有颅内EEG,1例两者皆有)的1255小时同时记录的耳内EEG数据以及头皮或颅内EEG,验证了耳内EEG系统捕捉局灶性发作的能力。

结果

在对耳内EEG信号进行的盲法、独立评估中,两名癫痫专家能够检测出随后使用临床金标准EEG模式识别出的86.4%的癫痫发作,误检率为每天0.1次,远低于动态监测报告的水平。耳内EEG信号未检测到的少数癫痫发作源自内侧颞叶深处或颞叶外,且仍非常局限,无明显扩散。在进行了多轮记录,中位连续佩戴时间为13小时后,患者报告对该设备的耐受性很高,头皮EEG组仅报告了轻微不良事件。

结论

这些初步结果证明了使用耳内EEG进行常规收集补充性、延长性和远程神经生理证据的潜力,这可能允许实时检测癫痫发作和癫痫样放电等阵发性事件。这项研究表明,耳内EEG设备可能有助于临床医生进行癫痫诊断、评估治疗效果和优化药物滴定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dab/10848360/fdc1b3df924b/42234_2023_135_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验