Venugopal Sharmila
Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, Division of Life Sciences.
Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2023 Dec 17;22(1):A74-A81. doi: 10.59390/AWCF3324. eCollection 2023 Fall.
Teaching scientific literature analysis skills is a critical step in research training. Here I describe a 6-week skill-building module on understanding scientific literature, incorporated into a 10-week undergraduate honors research practice course in Neuroscience. Key pedagogical components include: 1) student-centered active-learning, skill-building and community-building activities; 2) persistent adoption of a proven CREATE method and a novel curate scientific summary (CSS) method for teaching scientific literature analysis skills; 3) collaborative class organization consisting of persistent learning pods (PLPs) to facilitate student-driven participation and peer learning; and, 4) role play of a real research lab. Skill development was assessed using a self-assessment survey (SAS) and longitudinal evaluation of the CREATE and CSS methods application by the PLPs to analyze primary research articles (PRAs) over four weeks. Outcomes demonstrate alleviation of pre-existing student anxiety to read complex scientific literature and advancement of critical-thinking and collaborative skills. Specifically, the SAS responses indicate that student perception about reading scientific literature transformed from being a daunting task to an enjoyable activity; this enhanced their confidence in evaluating scientific literature. PLPs fostered student engagement, peer instruction, and community building, and contributed to skill development. Weekly assessment of CREATE and CSS application highlighted marked improvements in students' abilities to analyze and critique complicated scientific material. Role playing a research lab setting with a focused research theme facilitated integrative understanding of a frontier topic in Neuroscience. The outlined innovative approach can be adopted in Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE) and should help contribute to systematizing didactic practices to train neuroscientists.
教授科学文献分析技能是研究培训中的关键一步。在此,我描述了一个为期6周的关于理解科学文献的技能培养模块,该模块被纳入了一门为期10周的神经科学本科荣誉研究实践课程。关键教学组成部分包括:1)以学生为中心的主动学习、技能培养和社区建设活动;2)持续采用经过验证的CREATE方法和一种新颖的精心策划科学总结(CSS)方法来教授科学文献分析技能;3)由持续学习小组(PLP)组成的协作式课堂组织,以促进学生自主参与和同伴学习;以及4)真实研究实验室的角色扮演。使用自我评估调查(SAS)以及对PLP在四周内应用CREATE和CSS方法分析初级研究文章(PRA)的纵向评估来评估技能发展。结果表明,学生阅读复杂科学文献时先前存在的焦虑得到缓解,批判性思维和协作技能得到提升。具体而言,SAS的回答表明,学生对阅读科学文献的看法从一项艰巨的任务转变为一项有趣的活动;这增强了他们评估科学文献的信心。PLP促进了学生参与、同伴指导和社区建设,并有助于技能发展。对CREATE和CSS应用的每周评估突出显示了学生分析和批判复杂科学材料能力的显著提高。以一个重点研究主题进行研究实验室场景的角色扮演有助于对神经科学前沿主题的综合理解。所概述的创新方法可应用于基于课程的本科研究经验(CURE)中,并且应该有助于使教学实践系统化,以培养神经科学家。