• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科内分泌肿瘤专家委员会:患者体验评估

Multidisciplinary Endocrine Tumor Board: Assessment of the Patient Experience.

作者信息

Gorris Matthew A, Needham McKenzie L, Finnegan Kayla C, Obermiller Corey S, Witek Lauren, Randle Reese W, Burns Cynthia A

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2024 Feb 4;11:23743735241229383. doi: 10.1177/23743735241229383. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1177/23743735241229383
PMID:38323320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10845982/
Abstract

Research surrounding tumor boards has focused on patient outcomes and care coordination. Little is known about the patient experience with tumor boards. This survey examined aspects of the patient experience for patients presented at our multidisciplinary endocrine tumor board (ETB). A 15-item survey was distributed via the online patient portal to patients over the age of 18 whose case had been discussed at our ETB over an 18-month period. Descriptive statistics were reported, and a Fisher's exact test was used to examine relationships between variables. A total of 47 patients completed the survey (46%). A majority (72%) report their provider explained what the ETB is, and 77% report being informed their case would be discussed. Most patients were satisfied their case was being discussed (72%). A number of patients did report moderate or severe anxiety knowing their case was being discussed (15%). Sixty-four percent of patients report the ETB recommendations were clearly explained; however, satisfaction with the recommendations was slightly lower (53%). Despite the somewhat low satisfaction with the recommendations, 75% of patients felt more confident in their treatment plan knowing their case was discussed. Finally, if given the chance, 66% responded that they would have been interested in participating in their own ETB discussion. This study provides some insight into the patient experience surrounding tumor board discussions. Overall, patients are satisfied when their case is discussed at ETB. Patients can also experience anxiety about these discussions, and many patients desire to be present for their own discussions.

摘要

围绕肿瘤专家会诊小组的研究主要集中在患者的治疗结果和护理协调方面。对于患者在肿瘤专家会诊小组中的体验,我们了解得很少。这项调查研究了在我们的多学科内分泌肿瘤专家会诊小组(ETB)中就诊的患者的体验情况。通过在线患者门户网站向18岁以上、其病例在18个月内在我们的ETB中进行过讨论的患者发放了一份包含15个条目的调查问卷。报告了描述性统计数据,并使用费舍尔精确检验来研究变量之间的关系。共有47名患者完成了调查(回复率为46%)。大多数患者(72%)表示其医生解释了ETB是什么,77%的患者表示被告知其病例将被讨论。大多数患者对正在讨论他们的病例感到满意(72%)。一些患者确实表示在知道自己的病例正在被讨论时感到中度或重度焦虑(15%)。64%的患者表示ETB的建议得到了清晰的解释;然而,对这些建议的满意度略低(53%)。尽管对建议的满意度有所偏低,但75%的患者在知道自己的病例被讨论后对治疗方案更有信心。最后,如果有机会,66%的患者表示他们会有兴趣参与自己病例在ETB中的讨论。这项研究为肿瘤专家会诊小组讨论中患者的体验提供了一些见解。总体而言,当患者的病例在ETB中被讨论时,他们是满意的。患者在这些讨论中也可能会感到焦虑,而且许多患者希望参与自己病例的讨论。

相似文献

1
Multidisciplinary Endocrine Tumor Board: Assessment of the Patient Experience.多学科内分泌肿瘤专家委员会:患者体验评估
J Patient Exp. 2024 Feb 4;11:23743735241229383. doi: 10.1177/23743735241229383. eCollection 2024.
2
Patient satisfaction and informed consent for surgery.患者对手术的满意度和知情同意。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;217(2):181.e1-181.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.020. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
3
European multidisciplinary tumor boards support cross-border networking and increase treatment options for patients with rare gynecological tumors.欧洲多学科肿瘤委员会支持跨境联网,为患有罕见妇科肿瘤的患者增加治疗选择。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Oct 2;33(10):1621-1626. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004599.
4
5
Public attitudes on the U.S. health care system: findings from the 1999 Health Confidence Survey.美国公众对医疗保健系统的态度:1999年健康信心调查结果
EBRI Issue Brief. 1999 Nov(215):1-19.
6
Management of Poisoned Patients: Implementing a Blended Toxicology Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residents.中毒患者的管理:为急诊医学住院医师实施混合毒理学课程。
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2022 Apr 15;7(2):C1-C32. doi: 10.21980/J8C937. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Validation of team performance assessment of multidisciplinary tumor boards.多学科肿瘤委员会团队绩效评估的验证。
J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):891-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
9
Recommendations From the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.2023 年多囊卵巢综合征评估和管理国际循证指南推荐。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Sep 18;108(10):2447-2469. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad463.
10
Emergency medicine resident documentation: results of the 1999 american board of emergency medicine in-training examination survey.急诊医学住院医师文档记录:1999年美国急诊医学委员会在职考试调查结果
Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Oct;7(10):1135-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb01263.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient attendance at molecular tumor board: A new means of shared decision making?患者参加分子肿瘤委员会:一种新的共同决策方式?
Curr Probl Cancer. 2022 Jun;46(3):100860. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2022.100860. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
2
Influence of endocrine multidisciplinary tumor board on patient management and treatment decision making.内分泌多学科肿瘤委员会对患者管理和治疗决策的影响。
Am J Surg. 2022 Jan;223(1):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
3
Impact of satisfaction with physician-patient communication on self-care and adherence in patients with hypertension: cross-sectional study.医患沟通满意度对高血压患者自我护理及依从性的影响:横断面研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):1046. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05912-0.
4
Endocrine Tumor Board: Ten Years' Experience of a Multidisciplinary Clinical Working Conference.内分泌肿瘤专家组:十年多学科临床协作会议经验。
Perm J. 2020;24. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.140.
5
Higher number of multidisciplinary tumor board meetings per case leads to improved clinical outcome.病例中多学科肿瘤委员会会议次数越多,临床结局改善越明显。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06809-1.
6
The impact of tumor board on cancer care: evidence from an umbrella review.肿瘤委员会对癌症治疗的影响:来自伞式评价的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4930-3.
7
Treatment anxiety in breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者的治疗焦虑。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 May;299(5):1365-1371. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-05038-z. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
8
Global Practice and Efficiency of Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: Results of an American Society of Clinical Oncology International Survey.多学科肿瘤委员会的全球实践与效率:美国临床肿瘤学会国际调查结果
J Glob Oncol. 2015 Oct 28;1(2):57-64. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2015.000158. eCollection 2015 Dec.
9
Tumor Boards from the Perspective of Ambulant Oncological Care.肿瘤委员会:从流动肿瘤护理的角度来看。
Oncol Res Treat. 2016;39(6):377-83. doi: 10.1159/000446311. Epub 2016 May 25.
10
The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: A systematic review of the literature.多学科团队会议对肿瘤学环境中患者评估、管理和结局的影响:文献系统评价。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jan;42:56-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 24.