Unveiling rupture risk and clinical outcomes in midline aneurysms: A matched cohort analysis investigating the impact of localization within the anterior or posterior circulation.

Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) located in the anterior and posterior circulations of the Circle of Willis present differential rupture risks. This study aimed to compare the rupture risk and clinical outcomes of anterior communicating artery aneurysms (AcomA) and basilar tip aneurysms (BAs); two IA types located along the midline within the Circle of Willis. We retrospectively collected data from 1026 patients presenting with saccular IAs. Only AcomA and BAs with a 3D angiography were included. Out of 186 included IAs, a cohort of 32 BAs was matched with AcomA based on the patients' pre-existing conditions and morphological parameters of IAs. Clinical outcomes, including rupture risk, hydrocephalus development, vasospasm incidence, and patients' outcome, were compared. The analysis revealed no significant difference in rupture risk, development of hydrocephalus, need for ventricular drainage, or vasospasm incidence between the matched AcomA and BA cohorts. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes post-rupture did not significantly differ between the two groups, except for a higher Fisher Grade associated with BAs. Once accounting for morphological and patient factors, the rupture risk between AcomA and BAs is comparable. These findings underscore the importance of tailored management strategies for specific IA types and suggest that further investigations should focus on the role of individual patient and aneurysm characteristics in IA rupture risk and clinical outcomes.