Swiatek Vanessa Magdalena, Amini Amir, Dumitru Claudia Alexandra, Spitz Lena, Stein Klaus-Peter, Saalfeld Sylvia, Rashidi Ali, Sandalcioglu I Erol, Neyazi Belal
Department of Neurosurgery, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Department of Simulation and Graphics, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 13;61(3):498. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030498.
: The anterior communicating artery is a common location for intracranial aneurysms. Anterior communicating artery aneurysms (AcomA) pose a significant risk of rupture. Treatment options include microsurgical clipping and endovascular techniques, but the optimal approach remains controversial. This study aims to compare the outcomes of these two treatment modalities in a single-center patient cohort using a comprehensive matching process based on clinical and morphological parameters. : A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1026 patients with 1496 intracranial aneurysms treated between 2000 and 2018. After excluding cases lacking 3D angiography or aneurysms in other locations or without treatment, 140 AcomA were selected. The study matched 24 surgically treated AcomA cases with 116 endovascularly treated cases based on 21 morphological and clinical criteria, including age, sex, Hunt and Hess score, and Fisher grade. : The microsurgical clipping group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of complete aneurysm occlusion compared to the endovascular group ( = 0.007). However, this was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative ischemic complications in the surgical group (13 out of 24 cases) compared to the endovascular group (2 out of 116 cases). Despite these complications, no significant differences were found in clinical outcomes at discharge or follow-up, as measured by the modified Rankin Scale ( > 0.999). Both groups had comparable rates of hydrocephalus, vasospasm, and delayed cerebral ischemia. : Microsurgical clipping resulted in higher aneurysm occlusion rates but carried an increased risk of ischemic complications compared to endovascular treatment. Clinical outcomes were comparable between the two modalities, suggesting that treatment decisions should be individualized based on aneurysm characteristics and patient factors. Further prospective studies are warranted to optimize treatment strategies for AcomA.
前交通动脉是颅内动脉瘤的常见部位。前交通动脉动脉瘤(AcomA)破裂风险很大。治疗选择包括显微手术夹闭和血管内技术,但最佳方法仍存在争议。本研究旨在通过基于临床和形态学参数的综合匹配过程,比较单中心患者队列中这两种治疗方式的结果。
对2000年至2018年间治疗的1026例患有1496个颅内动脉瘤的患者进行了回顾性分析。在排除缺乏3D血管造影的病例、其他部位的动脉瘤或未治疗的病例后,选择了140个AcomA。该研究根据21项形态学和临床标准,包括年龄、性别、Hunt和Hess评分以及Fisher分级,将24例接受手术治疗的AcomA病例与116例接受血管内治疗的病例进行匹配。
与血管内组相比,显微手术夹闭组的动脉瘤完全闭塞率显著更高( = 0.007)。然而,与血管内组(116例中有2例)相比,手术组术后缺血性并发症的发生率更高(24例中有13例)。尽管有这些并发症,但根据改良Rankin量表测量,出院时或随访时的临床结果没有显著差异( > 0.999)。两组脑积水、血管痉挛和迟发性脑缺血的发生率相当。
与血管内治疗相比,显微手术夹闭导致更高的动脉瘤闭塞率,但缺血性并发症的风险增加。两种治疗方式的临床结果相当,这表明治疗决策应根据动脉瘤特征和患者因素个体化。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性研究,以优化AcomA的治疗策略。