Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (JAS-R, CIC, NP-P, JL, SKM, NSD, APM, RSO), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Psychiatry (JAS-R, NP-P, JL, SKM, NSD, APM, RSO), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Medicine (JAS-R,), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (JAS-R, CIC, NP-P, JL, SKM, NSD, APM, RSO), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Neurology (CIC), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;32(7):773-786. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
Previous studies have examined disparities in dementia care that affect the U.S. Hispanic/Latino population, including clinician bias, lack of cultural responsiveness, and less access to health care. However, there is limited research that specifically investigates the impact of language barriers to health disparities in dementia diagnosis.
In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 12,080 English- or Spanish- speaking patients who received an initial diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia between July 2017 and June 2019 were identified in the Yale New Haven Health (YNHH) electronic medical record. To evaluate the timeliness of diagnosis, an initial diagnosis of MCI was classified as "timely", while an initial diagnosis of dementia was considered "delayed." Comprehensiveness of diagnosis was assessed by measuring the presence of laboratory studies, neuroimaging, specialist evaluation, and advanced diagnostics six months before or after diagnosis. Binomial logistic regressions were calculated with and without adjustment for age, legal sex, ethnicity, neighborhood disadvantage, and medical comorbidities.
Spanish speakers were less likely to receive a timely diagnosis when compared with English speakers both before (unadjusted OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53-0.80, p <0.0001) and after adjusting for covariates (adjusted OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.75, p = 0.0001). Diagnostic services were provided equally between groups, except for referrals to geriatrics, which were more frequent among Spanish-speaking patients. A subgroup analysis revealed that Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latino patients were less likely to receive a timely diagnosis compared to English-speaking Hispanic/Latino patients (adjusted OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38-0.73, p = 0.0001).
Non-English language preference is likely to be a contributing factor to timely diagnosis of cognitive impairment. In this study, Spanish language preference rather than Hispanic/Latino ethnicity was a significant predictor of a less timely diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Policy changes are needed to reduce barriers in cognitive disorders care for Spanish-speaking patients.
先前的研究考察了影响美国西班牙裔/拉丁裔人群的痴呆症护理方面的差异,包括临床医生的偏见、缺乏文化敏感性以及获得医疗保健的机会较少。然而,关于语言障碍对痴呆症诊断中健康差异的影响,相关研究非常有限。
在这项回顾性的横断面研究中,在耶鲁纽黑文健康(YNHH)电子病历中,确定了 12080 名在 2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 6 月期间首次被诊断为轻度认知障碍(MCI)或痴呆症的英语或西班牙语患者。为了评估诊断的及时性,将 MCI 的初始诊断定义为“及时”,而将痴呆症的初始诊断视为“延迟”。通过测量在诊断前或诊断后六个月内是否进行了实验室研究、神经影像学检查、专家评估和高级诊断来评估诊断的全面性。使用二项逻辑回归进行计算,并分别在不调整和调整年龄、法定性别、种族、社区劣势和合并症的情况下进行调整。
与讲英语的患者相比,讲西班牙语的患者在未调整(比值比,0.65;95%置信区间,0.53-0.80,p<0.0001)和调整协变量后(比值比,0.55;95%置信区间,0.40-0.75,p=0.0001)更不太可能及时获得诊断。两组之间提供的诊断服务均等,除了转介给老年医学科的情况,西班牙语患者更常转介到该科室。亚组分析显示,与讲英语的西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者相比,讲西班牙语的西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者不太可能及时获得诊断(调整比值比,0.53;95%置信区间,0.38-0.73,p=0.0001)。
非英语语言偏好可能是认知障碍及时诊断的一个促成因素。在这项研究中,西班牙语语言偏好而不是西班牙裔/拉丁裔种族是认知障碍诊断不及时的一个显著预测因素。需要政策改变以减少西班牙语患者认知障碍护理方面的障碍。