• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CyPass® 微型支架取出术后并发症:病例系列

Complications after CyPass® Micro-Stent explantation: a case series.

作者信息

Habbe Kirsten J, Kohlhaas Markus, Fili Sofia

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology at St. Johannes Hospital in Dortmund, Johannesstraße 9-13, 44137, Dortmund, Germany.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 9;44(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-02993-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10792-024-02993-2
PMID:38336985
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe the in toto explantation of the CyPass® Micro-Stent and its conceivable complications.

METHODS

This is a case series of eighteen eyes from fourteen patients who underwent CyPass® Micro-Stent implantation due to mild to moderate glaucoma and who subsequently suffered from loss of endothelial cell density. Consequently, the CyPass® Micro-Stent was in toto explanted. The surgical procedure and its complications are described and compared with trimming of the CyPass® Micro-Stent.

RESULTS

A postoperative hyphema was developed in 8 of the 18 eyes. In four of them the hyphema was self-limiting, while in two patients an anterior chamber irrigation was necessary. One patient suffered from a severe intracameral bleeding and iridodialysis during explantation, so that the base of the iris had to be scleral fixated. The remaining explantations were without complications.

CONCLUSION

Dealing with implanted CyPass® Micro-Stents poses a challenge for ophthalmic surgeons. An in toto removal can be traumatic, since the CyPass stent often is fibrotic encapsulated and fused with the surrounding tissue. Alternatively, trimming of the CyPass is also a viable option to avoid further endothelial damage. Reported complications of CyPass trimming are consistent with those that can occur after explantation. Further data on the development of the endothelial cells after trimming or explantation are not yet available. Therefore, it remains open whether trimming of the CyPass, in contrast to complete removal, carries the risk of further endothelial cell loss.

摘要

目的

描述CyPass®微支架的整块取出及其可能出现的并发症。

方法

这是一个病例系列,包含14例患者的18只眼,这些患者因轻至中度青光眼接受了CyPass®微支架植入术,随后出现内皮细胞密度降低。因此,对CyPass®微支架进行了整块取出。描述了手术过程及其并发症,并与CyPass®微支架的修剪情况进行了比较。

结果

18只眼中有8只术后出现前房积血。其中4只眼的前房积血可自行吸收,而2例患者需要进行前房冲洗。1例患者在取出过程中发生严重的前房内出血和虹膜根部离断,因此不得不对虹膜根部进行巩膜固定。其余取出过程均无并发症。

结论

处理植入的CyPass®微支架对眼科医生来说是一项挑战。整块取出可能具有创伤性,因为CyPass支架通常被纤维组织包裹并与周围组织融合。另外,修剪CyPass也是避免进一步内皮损伤的可行选择。报道的CyPass修剪并发症与取出后可能发生的并发症一致。关于修剪或取出后内皮细胞发育的进一步数据尚未可得。因此,与完全取出相比,CyPass修剪是否会有进一步内皮细胞丢失的风险仍不明确。

相似文献

1
Complications after CyPass® Micro-Stent explantation: a case series.CyPass® 微型支架取出术后并发症:病例系列
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 9;44(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-02993-2.
2
Foreign body reaction after CyPass® Micro-Stent implantation: a case series.CyPass® 微支架植入后的异物反应:病例系列
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;261(2):513-520. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05767-7. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
3
[CyPass microstent trimming with special cutting forceps : Video article].[使用特殊切割钳修剪CyPass微支架:视频文章]
Ophthalmologe. 2022 Apr;119(4):421-424. doi: 10.1007/s00347-022-01596-5. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
[Microsurgical trimming of the CyPass stent : Surgical procedure of the Neubrandenburg Eye Clinic. Video article].[CyPass支架的显微外科修剪:新勃兰登堡眼科诊所的手术步骤。视频文章]
Ophthalmologe. 2020 Dec;117(12):1241-1246. doi: 10.1007/s00347-020-01247-7.
5
Two-year clinical experience with the CyPass micro-stent: safety and surgical outcomes of a novel supraciliary micro-stent.CyPass微支架的两年临床经验:一种新型睫状上腔微支架的安全性和手术效果
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2014 Apr;231(4):377-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1368214. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
6
Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss and Morphometric Changes 5 Years after Phacoemulsification with or without CyPass Micro-Stent.超声乳化白内障吸除术联合或不联合 CyPass 微支架术后 5 年的角膜内皮细胞丢失和形态计量学变化
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;208:211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
7
[Explantation of the CyPass implant in a case series of patients with corneal decompensation].[角膜失代偿患者系列病例中CyPass植入物的植入说明]
Ophthalmologe. 2021 Jan;118(1):42-49. doi: 10.1007/s00347-020-01106-5.
8
Anterior Chamber XEN Gel Stent Movements: The Impact on Corneal Endothelial Cell Density.前房 XEN 凝胶支架移动:对角膜内皮细胞密度的影响。
J Glaucoma. 2019 Jun;28(6):e93-e95. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001200.
9
Supraciliary Micro-stent Implantation for Open-Angle Glaucoma Failing Topical Therapy: 1-Year Results of a Multicenter Study.用于局部治疗失败的开角型青光眼的睫上微支架植入术:一项多中心研究的1年结果
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;159(6):1075-1081.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
10
Initial Clinical Experience With the CyPass Micro-Stent: Safety and Surgical Outcomes of a Novel Supraciliary Microstent.CyPass微支架的初步临床经验:一种新型睫状体上微支架的安全性和手术结果
J Glaucoma. 2016 Jan;25(1):106-12. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000134.

本文引用的文献

1
Foreign body reaction after CyPass® Micro-Stent implantation: a case series.CyPass® 微支架植入后的异物反应:病例系列
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;261(2):513-520. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05767-7. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
2
[CyPass microstent trimming with special cutting forceps : Video article].[使用特殊切割钳修剪CyPass微支架:视频文章]
Ophthalmologe. 2022 Apr;119(4):421-424. doi: 10.1007/s00347-022-01596-5. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
3
Ultrastructural analysis of explanted CyPass microstents and correlation with clinical findings.
体外分析 CyPass 微支架并与临床发现相关联。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;260(8):2663-2673. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05620-x. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
4
Chronic Granulomatous Inflammation after CyPass® Implantation.CyPass®植入术后的慢性肉芽肿性炎症。
Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2020 Aug;6(4):259-264. doi: 10.1159/000505491. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
5
[Explantation of the CyPass implant in a case series of patients with corneal decompensation].[角膜失代偿患者系列病例中CyPass植入物的植入说明]
Ophthalmologe. 2021 Jan;118(1):42-49. doi: 10.1007/s00347-020-01106-5.
6
Long-term ophthalmic anatomical and functional outcomes after surgical removal of intraorbital foreign bodies.眶内异物取出术后的长期眼科解剖和功能结果。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;31(1):263-270. doi: 10.1177/1120672119885587. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
7
Safety and Effectiveness of CyPass Supraciliary Micro-Stent in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: 5-Year Results from the COMPASS XT Study.CyPass 巩膜上微支架治疗原发性开角型青光眼的安全性和有效性:COMPASS XT 研究 5 年结果。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;208:219-225. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss and Morphometric Changes 5 Years after Phacoemulsification with or without CyPass Micro-Stent.超声乳化白内障吸除术联合或不联合 CyPass 微支架术后 5 年的角膜内皮细胞丢失和形态计量学变化
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;208:211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
9
[One-year results after Cypass implantation].[旁路植入术后一年的结果]
Ophthalmologe. 2019 May;116(5):447-455. doi: 10.1007/s00347-018-0745-6.
10
An Update on Implants for Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS).微创青光眼手术(MIGS)植入物的最新进展
Ophthalmol Ther. 2017 Dec;6(2):233-241. doi: 10.1007/s40123-017-0098-2. Epub 2017 Jul 20.