Suzuka Takanori, Tanaka Nobuhiro, Kadoya Yuma, Ida Mitsuru, Iwata Masato, Ozu Naoki, Kawaguchi Masahiko
Department of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara 634-8522, Nara, Japan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Ikeda City Hospital, 3-1-18 Jonan, Ikeda 635-8501, Osaka, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 25;13(3):712. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030712.
Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through a perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) provides a wide analgesic range. Herein, we examined the quality of recovery (QoR) of M-TAPA for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) compared with oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (OSTAPB) and measured plasma levobupivacaine concentrations (PC). Forty female patients undergoing TLH were randomized to each group. Nerve blocks were performed bilaterally with 25 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine administered per side. The primary outcome was changes in QoR-15 scores on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2 from the preoperative baseline. The main secondary outcomes were PC at 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after performing nerve block. Group differences (M-TAPA-OSTAPB) in mean changes from baseline in QoR-15 scores on POD 1 and 2 were -11.3 (95% confidence interval (CI), -24.9 to 2.4, = 0.104; standard deviation (SD), 22.8) and -7.0 (95% CI, -20.5 to 6.6, = 0.307; SD, 18.7), respectively. Changes in PC were similar in both groups. The post hoc analysis using Bayesian statistics revealed that posterior probabilities of M-TAPA being clinically more effective than OSTAPB were up to 22.4 and 24.4% for POD 1 and 2, respectively. In conclusion, M-TAPA may not be superior to OSTAPB for TLH.
经软骨膜入路改良胸腹神经阻滞(M-TAPA)具有广泛的镇痛范围。在此,我们比较了M-TAPA与肋下斜行腹横肌平面阻滞(OSTAPB)用于全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)的恢复质量(QoR),并测量了血浆左旋布比卡因浓度(PC)。40例行TLH的女性患者被随机分为每组。双侧进行神经阻滞,每侧注射25 mL 0.25%左旋布比卡因。主要结局是术后第1天和第2天QoR-15评分相对于术前基线的变化。主要次要结局是神经阻滞后15、30、45、60和120分钟时的PC。术后第1天和第2天,QoR-15评分相对于基线的平均变化的组间差异(M-TAPA - OSTAPB)分别为-11.3(95%置信区间(CI),-24.9至2.4,P = 0.104;标准差(SD),22.8)和-7.0(95%CI,-20.5至6.6,P = 0.307;SD,18.7)。两组的PC变化相似。使用贝叶斯统计的事后分析显示,M-TAPA在临床效果上比OSTAPB更有效的后验概率在术后第1天和第2天分别高达22.4%和24.4%。总之,对于TLH,M-TAPA可能并不优于OSTAPB。