• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从化学结构预测安姆斯试验结果的进展:对第一和第二安姆斯/定量构效关系国际挑战项目模型的深入再评估。

Progress in Predicting Ames Test Outcomes from Chemical Structures: An In-Depth Re-Evaluation of Models from the 1st and 2nd Ames/QSAR International Challenge Projects.

机构信息

Department of Medical Molecular Informatics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 23;25(3):1373. doi: 10.3390/ijms25031373.

DOI:10.3390/ijms25031373
PMID:38338650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10855369/
Abstract

The Ames/quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) International Challenge Projects, held during 2014-2017 and 2020-2022, evaluated the performance of various predictive models. Despite the significant insights gained, the rules allowing participants to select prediction targets introduced ambiguity in model performance evaluation. This reanalysis identified the highest-performing prediction model, assuming a 100% coverage rate (COV) for all prediction target compounds and an estimated performance variation due to changes in COV. All models from both projects were evaluated using balance accuracy (BA), the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), the F1 score (F1), and the first principal component (PC1). After normalizing the COV, a correlation analysis with these indicators was conducted, and the evaluation index for all prediction models in terms of the COV was estimated. In total, using 109 models, the model with the highest estimated BA (76.9) at 100% COV was MMI-VOTE1, as reported by Meiji Pharmaceutical University (MPU). The best models for MCC, F1, and PC1 were all MMI-STK1, also reported by MPU. All the models reported by MPU ranked in the top four. MMI-STK1 was estimated to have F1 scores of 59.2, 61.5, and 63.1 at COV levels of 90%, 60%, and 30%, respectively. These findings highlight the current state and potential of the Ames prediction technology.

摘要

Ames/定量构效关系(QSAR)国际挑战项目于 2014-2017 年和 2020-2022 年期间举行,评估了各种预测模型的性能。尽管获得了重要的见解,但允许参与者选择预测目标的规则在模型性能评估中引入了模糊性。这项重新分析确定了表现最佳的预测模型,假设所有预测目标化合物的覆盖率(COV)为 100%,并且由于 COV 的变化而估计了性能变化。来自两个项目的所有模型都使用平衡准确性(BA)、马修斯相关系数(MCC)、F1 分数(F1)和第一主成分(PC1)进行了评估。在对 COV 进行归一化后,对这些指标进行了相关分析,并根据 COV 对所有预测模型的评估指标进行了估计。总共使用了 109 个模型,在 100% COV 下,具有最高估计 BA(76.9)的模型是由明治药科大学(MPU)报告的 MMI-VOTE1。在 MCC、F1 和 PC1 方面表现最好的模型都是 MMI-STK1,也是 MPU 报告的模型。MPU 报告的所有模型都排名前四。MMI-STK1 在 COV 水平为 90%、60%和 30%时,估计的 F1 分数分别为 59.2、61.5 和 63.1。这些发现突出了 Ames 预测技术的现状和潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7e/10855369/8b4c847b356b/ijms-25-01373-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7e/10855369/e1610703af97/ijms-25-01373-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7e/10855369/bf0f7cb35b63/ijms-25-01373-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7e/10855369/6c6eaea30dc4/ijms-25-01373-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7e/10855369/b03be33c8948/ijms-25-01373-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7e/10855369/8b4c847b356b/ijms-25-01373-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7e/10855369/e1610703af97/ijms-25-01373-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7e/10855369/bf0f7cb35b63/ijms-25-01373-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7e/10855369/6c6eaea30dc4/ijms-25-01373-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7e/10855369/b03be33c8948/ijms-25-01373-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7e/10855369/8b4c847b356b/ijms-25-01373-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Progress in Predicting Ames Test Outcomes from Chemical Structures: An In-Depth Re-Evaluation of Models from the 1st and 2nd Ames/QSAR International Challenge Projects.从化学结构预测安姆斯试验结果的进展:对第一和第二安姆斯/定量构效关系国际挑战项目模型的深入再评估。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 23;25(3):1373. doi: 10.3390/ijms25031373.
2
Evaluation of QSAR models for predicting mutagenicity: outcome of the Second Ames/QSAR international challenge project.预测致突变性的定量构效关系模型评价:第二届 Ame/QSAR 国际挑战赛项目的结果。
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2023 Oct-Dec;34(12):983-1001. doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2023.2284902. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
3
Improvement of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project.用于预测埃姆斯致突变性的定量构效关系(QSAR)工具的改进:埃姆斯/QSAR国际挑战赛项目的成果
Mutagenesis. 2019 Mar 6;34(1):3-16. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gey031.
4
Evaluation of QSAR models for the prediction of ames genotoxicity: a retrospective exercise on the chemical substances registered under the EU REACH regulation.用于预测埃姆斯致突变性的定量构效关系(QSAR)模型评估:对欧盟化学品注册、评估、授权和限制(REACH)法规下注册的化学物质的回顾性研究。
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2014;32(3):273-98. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2014.938955.
5
Applicability domains for classification problems: Benchmarking of distance to models for Ames mutagenicity set.分类问题的适用域:Ames 致突变性集模型距离的基准测试。
J Chem Inf Model. 2010 Dec 27;50(12):2094-111. doi: 10.1021/ci100253r. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
6
Multiple Instance Learning Improves Ames Mutagenicity Prediction for Problematic Molecular Species.多实例学习提高对问题分子物种的 Ames 致突变性预测。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2023 Aug 21;36(8):1227-1237. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00372. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
7
Machine learning - Predicting Ames mutagenicity of small molecules.机器学习——预测小分子的艾姆斯致突变性。
J Mol Graph Model. 2021 Dec;109:108011. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2021.108011. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
8
Predicting Ames Mutagenicity Using Conformal Prediction in the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project.在艾姆斯/定量构效关系国际挑战赛项目中使用共形预测法预测艾姆斯诱变性
Mutagenesis. 2019 Mar 6;34(1):33-40. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gey038.
9
Development of a new quantitative structure-activity relationship model for predicting Ames mutagenicity of food flavor chemicals using StarDrop™ auto-Modeller™.使用StarDrop™自动建模器™开发一种用于预测食品香料化学品Ames致突变性的新型定量构效关系模型。
Genes Environ. 2021 Apr 30;43(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41021-021-00182-6.
10
A large comparison of integrated SAR/QSAR models of the Ames test for mutagenicity.大规模整合的 Ames 试验致突变性的 SAR/QSAR 模型比较。
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2018 Aug;29(8):591-611. doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2018.1497702. Epub 2018 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
New Benzothiazole-Monoterpenoid Hybrids as Multifunctional Molecules with Potential Applications in Cosmetics.新型苯并噻唑-单萜类杂合物作为多功能分子在化妆品中的潜在应用
Molecules. 2025 Jan 31;30(3):636. doi: 10.3390/molecules30030636.
2
Local QSAR based on quantum chemistry calculations for the stability of nitrenium ions to reduce false positive outcomes from standard QSAR systems for the mutagenicity of primary aromatic amines.基于量子化学计算的局部定量构效关系,用于氮鎓离子的稳定性,以减少标准定量构效关系系统对伯芳香胺致突变性产生的假阳性结果。
Genes Environ. 2024 Nov 21;46(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41021-024-00318-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of QSAR models for predicting mutagenicity: outcome of the Second Ames/QSAR international challenge project.预测致突变性的定量构效关系模型评价:第二届 Ame/QSAR 国际挑战赛项目的结果。
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2023 Oct-Dec;34(12):983-1001. doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2023.2284902. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
2
Confidence interval for micro-averaged and macro-averaged scores.微观平均和宏观平均分数的置信区间。
Appl Intell (Dordr). 2022 Mar;52(5):4961-4972. doi: 10.1007/s10489-021-02635-5. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
3
An assessment of mutagenicity of chemical substances by (quantitative) structure-activity relationship.
通过(定量)构效关系评估化学物质的致突变性。
Genes Environ. 2020 Jul 2;42:23. doi: 10.1186/s41021-020-00163-1. eCollection 2020.
4
Questioning the "SPIN and SNOUT" rule in clinical testing.质疑临床检测中的“SPIN与SNOUT”规则。
Arch Physiother. 2019 Mar 7;9:4. doi: 10.1186/s40945-019-0056-5. eCollection 2019.
5
Improvement of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project.用于预测埃姆斯致突变性的定量构效关系(QSAR)工具的改进:埃姆斯/QSAR国际挑战赛项目的成果
Mutagenesis. 2019 Mar 6;34(1):3-16. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gey031.
6
Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric.使用马修斯相关系数度量的不平衡数据最优分类器。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0177678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177678. eCollection 2017.
7
Exploring Intrinsic Dimensionality of Chemical Spaces for Robust QSAR Model Development: A Comparison of Several Statistical Approaches.探索化学空间的内在维度以稳健开发定量构效关系模型:几种统计方法的比较
Curr Comput Aided Drug Des. 2016;12(4):294-301. doi: 10.2174/1573409912666160906111821.
8
Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care.解读用于患者护理的诊断准确性研究。
BMJ. 2012 Jul 2;345:e3999. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3999.
9
Comparison of different approaches to define the applicability domain of QSAR models.比较不同方法来定义定量构效关系模型的适用性域。
Molecules. 2012 Apr 25;17(5):4791-810. doi: 10.3390/molecules17054791.
10
Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation.通过平移方法生成的频率曲线系统。
Biometrika. 1949 Jun;36(Pt. 1-2):149-76.