Department of Medical Molecular Informatics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 23;25(3):1373. doi: 10.3390/ijms25031373.
The Ames/quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) International Challenge Projects, held during 2014-2017 and 2020-2022, evaluated the performance of various predictive models. Despite the significant insights gained, the rules allowing participants to select prediction targets introduced ambiguity in model performance evaluation. This reanalysis identified the highest-performing prediction model, assuming a 100% coverage rate (COV) for all prediction target compounds and an estimated performance variation due to changes in COV. All models from both projects were evaluated using balance accuracy (BA), the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), the F1 score (F1), and the first principal component (PC1). After normalizing the COV, a correlation analysis with these indicators was conducted, and the evaluation index for all prediction models in terms of the COV was estimated. In total, using 109 models, the model with the highest estimated BA (76.9) at 100% COV was MMI-VOTE1, as reported by Meiji Pharmaceutical University (MPU). The best models for MCC, F1, and PC1 were all MMI-STK1, also reported by MPU. All the models reported by MPU ranked in the top four. MMI-STK1 was estimated to have F1 scores of 59.2, 61.5, and 63.1 at COV levels of 90%, 60%, and 30%, respectively. These findings highlight the current state and potential of the Ames prediction technology.
Ames/定量构效关系(QSAR)国际挑战项目于 2014-2017 年和 2020-2022 年期间举行,评估了各种预测模型的性能。尽管获得了重要的见解,但允许参与者选择预测目标的规则在模型性能评估中引入了模糊性。这项重新分析确定了表现最佳的预测模型,假设所有预测目标化合物的覆盖率(COV)为 100%,并且由于 COV 的变化而估计了性能变化。来自两个项目的所有模型都使用平衡准确性(BA)、马修斯相关系数(MCC)、F1 分数(F1)和第一主成分(PC1)进行了评估。在对 COV 进行归一化后,对这些指标进行了相关分析,并根据 COV 对所有预测模型的评估指标进行了估计。总共使用了 109 个模型,在 100% COV 下,具有最高估计 BA(76.9)的模型是由明治药科大学(MPU)报告的 MMI-VOTE1。在 MCC、F1 和 PC1 方面表现最好的模型都是 MMI-STK1,也是 MPU 报告的模型。MPU 报告的所有模型都排名前四。MMI-STK1 在 COV 水平为 90%、60%和 30%时,估计的 F1 分数分别为 59.2、61.5 和 63.1。这些发现突出了 Ames 预测技术的现状和潜力。