Edward Jean S, Rayens Mary Kay, McLouth Laurie E, Eisele Lori P, Scales Joan, Williams Lovoria B, Hildebrandt Gerhard
College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Department of Behavioral Health, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Psychooncology. 2024 Feb;33(2):e6303. doi: 10.1002/pon.6303.
Relatively few dyad-based studies have evaluated the shared psychosocial and financial toxicity (FT) experiences of hematologic patients and their caregivers, especially those undergoing bone marrow transplantations (BMTs). This study evaluated the association of FT with health-related quality of life (QOL) among BMT patient-caregiver dyads.
Survey and electronic health record data were collected between April 2021 and January 2022 from BMT patients and their caregivers pre- (T1) and post-intervention (T2). Thirty-four patient-caregiver dyads completed surveys; all dyads included a patient experiencing elevated T1 FT. The effect of the total FT score (i.e., the combination of psychological response, coping behaviors, and material conditions domain scores) on physical health, mental health, anxiety, depression and distress scores was evaluated using Actor-Partner Interdependence Modeling (APIM).
Patients and caregivers who reported lower total FT scores had better physical and mental health, and lower anxiety, depressive symptoms, distress (APIM actor effects). None of the partner effects were significant in the APIM models. Other model findings indicated that compared with caregivers, patients had lower reported physical health; mental health scores were higher, on average, for all participants at the T2 compared with T1; and members of dyads whose caregiver took time off work reported better physical health and lower depressive symptoms and distress than those whose caregiver did not.
Our study addresses a significant gap in dyad-based cancer FT studies; the findings underscore the need for additional research to help develop tailored dyad-level FT interventions for improving health-related QOL among BMT patients.
相对较少的基于二元组的研究评估了血液学患者及其护理人员共同的心理社会和经济毒性(FT)经历,尤其是那些正在接受骨髓移植(BMT)的患者。本研究评估了FT与BMT患者-护理人员二元组中健康相关生活质量(QOL)之间的关联。
在2021年4月至2022年1月期间,收集了BMT患者及其护理人员在干预前(T1)和干预后(T2)的调查和电子健康记录数据。34个患者-护理人员二元组完成了调查;所有二元组都包括一名T1期FT升高的患者。使用actor-伙伴相互依赖模型(APIM)评估总FT评分(即心理反应、应对行为和物质条件领域评分的组合)对身体健康、心理健康、焦虑、抑郁和痛苦评分的影响。
报告总FT评分较低的患者和护理人员身体健康和心理健康状况较好,焦虑、抑郁症状和痛苦程度较低(APIM行为者效应)。在APIM模型中,没有一个伙伴效应是显著的。其他模型结果表明,与护理人员相比,患者报告的身体健康状况较差;与T1期相比,所有参与者在T2期的心理健康评分平均更高;护理人员请假的二元组成员报告的身体健康状况更好,抑郁症状和痛苦程度低于护理人员未请假的二元组。
我们的研究填补了基于二元组的癌症FT研究中的一个重大空白;研究结果强调需要进一步研究,以帮助制定针对二元组水平的FT干预措施,以改善BMT患者的健康相关生活质量。