• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Dynamic Coronary Roadmap versus standard angiography for percutaneous coronary intervention: the randomised, multicentre DCR4Contrast trial.动态冠状动脉造影路线图与标准血管造影术用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机、多中心DCR4对比试验
EuroIntervention. 2024 Feb 5;20(3):e198-e206. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00460.
2
Rationale and design of the Dynamic Coronary Roadmap for Contrast Reduction (DCR4Contrast) in PCI randomized controlled trial.动态冠状动脉造影对比剂减少(DCR4Contrast)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)随机对照试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2023 Sep;263:151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
3
Real-World Evaluation of PCI Guidance Using Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: A DCR4Contrast Trial Secondary Analysis.使用动态冠状动脉造影路线图对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)指导的真实世界评估:DCR4对比试验的二次分析
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Feb 7;4(4):102504. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102504. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Dynamic coronary roadmap in percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的动态冠状动脉造影:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):681. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04350-8.
5
Ultra-Low Contrast Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Minimize the Risk for Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease.超低对比度经皮冠状动脉介入治疗以降低重度慢性肾脏病患者对比剂诱发急性肾损伤的风险
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Jun;31(6):176-182. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
6
Effect of a Contrast Modulation System on Contrast Media Use and the Rate of Acute Kidney Injury After Coronary Angiography.对比调制系统对冠状动脉造影后对比剂使用和急性肾损伤发生率的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 27;11(16):1601-1610. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.007.
7
The impact of percutaneous coronary intervention using the novel dynamic coronary roadmap system.使用新型动态冠状动脉造影系统进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响。
Heart Vessels. 2020 Mar;35(3):323-330. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01502-1. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
8
Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with complex lesions (OCCUPI): an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial in South Korea.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管造影引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗复杂病变患者(OCCUPI):韩国一项由研究者发起的、多中心、随机、开放标签、优效性试验。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 14;404(10457):1029-1039. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01454-5. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
9
Dynamic coronary roadmap-guided PCI reduces contrast volume and radiation time compared to standard angiography PCI: A meta-analysis.与标准血管造影引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相比,动态冠状动脉造影引导的PCI可减少造影剂用量和辐射时间:一项荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 30;11(1):e41557. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41557. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
10
Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions with a Novel Dynamic Coronary Roadmap System.新型动态冠状动脉造影系统行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的慢性肾脏病患者的临床转归。
Int Heart J. 2023 Sep 30;64(5):823-831. doi: 10.1536/ihj.23-213. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Mitochondrial DNA methylation is involved in contrast-induced renal tubular epithelial cell injury.线粒体DNA甲基化与对比剂诱导的肾小管上皮细胞损伤有关。
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2532112. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2532112. Epub 2025 Aug 10.
2
Real-World Evaluation of PCI Guidance Using Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: A DCR4Contrast Trial Secondary Analysis.使用动态冠状动脉造影路线图对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)指导的真实世界评估:DCR4对比试验的二次分析
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Feb 7;4(4):102504. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102504. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Interventional Cardiovascular Care.利用人工智能推动介入性心血管护理创新。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Mar 18;4(3Part B):102562. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.102562. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Study of fluoroscopic landmarks in IVUS guided zero contrast PCI - A single centre experience.血管内超声引导下零造影剂冠状动脉介入治疗中透视标记的研究——单中心经验
Indian Heart J. 2025 Mar-Apr;77(2):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2025.02.006. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
5
Dynamic coronary roadmap-guided PCI reduces contrast volume and radiation time compared to standard angiography PCI: A meta-analysis.与标准血管造影引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相比,动态冠状动脉造影引导的PCI可减少造影剂用量和辐射时间:一项荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 30;11(1):e41557. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41557. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
6
Advancements and applications of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging: a comprehensive review.人工智能在心血管成像中的进展与应用:综述
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024 Dec 14;2(4):qyae136. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae136. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Dynamic coronary roadmap in percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的动态冠状动脉造影:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):681. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04350-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Rationale and design of the Dynamic Coronary Roadmap for Contrast Reduction (DCR4Contrast) in PCI randomized controlled trial.动态冠状动脉造影对比剂减少(DCR4Contrast)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)随机对照试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2023 Sep;263:151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
2
Dynamic Coronary Roadmap in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From an Open-Label, Randomized Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的动态冠状动脉路径图:一项开放标签随机试验的结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 22;14(22):2523-2525. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.068. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
3
Incremental Cost of Acute Kidney Injury after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States.美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性肾损伤的增量成本。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jan 1;125(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.09.042. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
4
The impact of percutaneous coronary intervention using the novel dynamic coronary roadmap system.使用新型动态冠状动脉造影系统进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响。
Heart Vessels. 2020 Mar;35(3):323-330. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01502-1. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
5
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 20;14(14):1435-1534. doi: 10.4244/EIJY19M01_01.
6
Dynamic coronary roadmapping during percutaneous coronary intervention: a feasibility study.动态冠状动脉路径图在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:一项可行性研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2018 Jul 31;23(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40001-018-0333-x.
7
Temporal Trends in Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.经美国退伍军人事务部临床评估、报告和追踪项目观察到的冠状动脉造影及经皮冠状动脉介入术的时间趋势。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 14;11(9):879-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.035.
8
Treatment of Higher-Risk Patients With an Indication for Revascularization: Evolution Within the Field of Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.有血运重建指征的高危患者的治疗:当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗领域的进展
Circulation. 2016 Aug 2;134(5):422-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022061.
9
On the road: First-in-man bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention with the use of a dynamic coronary road map and StentBoost Live imaging system.在路上:使用动态冠状动脉路线图和StentBoost Live成像系统进行首例人体分叉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 15;215:7-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.03.133. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Impact of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes: Pooled Analysis From the HORIZONS-AMI and ACUITY Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤对短期和长期预后的影响:来自HORIZONS-AMI和ACUITY试验的汇总分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;8(8):e002475. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002475.

动态冠状动脉造影路线图与标准血管造影术用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机、多中心DCR4对比试验

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap versus standard angiography for percutaneous coronary intervention: the randomised, multicentre DCR4Contrast trial.

作者信息

Hennessey Breda, Danenberg Haim, De Vroey Frédéric, Kirtane Ajay J, Parikh Manish, Karmpaliotis Dimitrios, Messenger John C, Strobel Aaron, Curcio Alejandro, van Mourik Martijn S, Eshuis Peter, Escaned Javier

机构信息

Hospital Clinico San Carlos IdISSC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Cardiology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2024 Feb 5;20(3):e198-e206. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00460.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00460
PMID:38343370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10851082/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decreasing the amount of iodinated contrast is an important safety aspect of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with a high risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). Dynamic Coronary Roadmap (DCR) is a PCI navigation support tool projecting a motion-compensated virtual coronary roadmap overlay on fluoroscopy, potentially limiting the need for contrast during PCI.

AIMS

This study investigates the contrast-sparing potential of DCR in PCI, compared to standard angiographic guidance.

METHODS

The Dynamic Coronary Roadmap for Contrast Reduction (DCR4Contrast) trial is a multicentre, international, prospective, unblinded, stratified 1:1 randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to either DCR-guided PCI or to conventional angiography-guided PCI. The primary endpoint was the total volume of iodinated contrast administered, and the secondary endpoint was the number of cineangiography runs during PCI.

RESULTS

The study population included 356 randomised patients (179 in DCR and 177 in control groups, respectively). There were no differences in patient demographics, angiographic characteristics or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between the two groups. The total contrast volume used during PCI was significantly lower with DCR guidance compared with conventional angiographic guidance (64.6±44.4 ml vs 90.8±55.4 ml, respectively; p<0.001). The total number of cineangiography runs was also significantly reduced in the DCR group (8.7±4.7 vs 11.7±7.6 in the control group; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional angiography-guided PCI, DCR guidance was associated with a significant reduction in both contrast volume and the number of cineangiography runs during PCI. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04085614).

摘要

背景

减少碘化造影剂用量是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的一个重要安全方面,特别是在有造影剂诱发急性肾损伤(CI-AKI)高风险的患者中。动态冠状动脉造影导航(DCR)是一种PCI导航支持工具,可在荧光透视下投射运动补偿虚拟冠状动脉造影导航图,有可能减少PCI期间对造影剂的需求。

目的

本研究旨在探讨与标准血管造影引导相比,DCR在PCI中的造影剂节省潜力。

方法

减少造影剂用量的动态冠状动脉造影导航(DCR4Contrast)试验是一项多中心、国际性、前瞻性、非盲、分层1:1随机对照试验。患者被随机分为DCR引导的PCI组或传统血管造影引导的PCI组。主要终点是碘化造影剂的总用量,次要终点是PCI期间电影血管造影的次数。

结果

研究人群包括356例随机分组的患者(DCR组179例,对照组177例)。两组患者的人口统计学、血管造影特征或估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)无差异。与传统血管造影引导相比,DCR引导下PCI期间使用的造影剂总量显著降低(分别为64.6±44.4 ml和90.8±55.4 ml;p<0.001)。DCR组电影血管造影的总次数也显著减少(对照组为8.7±4.7次,DCR组为11.7±7.6次;p<0.001)。

结论

与传统血管造影引导的PCI相比,DCR引导与PCI期间造影剂用量和电影血管造影次数的显著减少相关。(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04085614)