Comparison of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block versus erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia after percutaneous nephrolithotomy - A randomised, double-blind, controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Paravertebral block (PVB) is the regional anaesthesia of choice for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is also effective for the same. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy and ease of performing PVB or ESPB for PCNL surgery.

METHODS

This study was conducted in 60 patients undergoing PCNL, who were randomised to Group P ( = 30; received ultrasound-guided [USG] PVB) and Group E ( = 30; received USG ESPB) after general anaesthesia. Blocks were administered at T10 level on the side of the surgery using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The trachea was extubated at the end of surgery. The primary outcome was analgesia duration, and secondary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, analgesic consumption, ease of block performance, time taken to perform the block and complications between the two groups. Continuous variables were compared using an independent sample -test, and categorical variables were analysed using Pearson's Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Demographic variables were comparable in both groups. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) time of first rescue analgesia in Group P and Group E were 16.6 (20.4)(95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.02-20.32) h and 16.3 (21.8) (95% CI: 8.17-24.51) h, respectively ( = 0.95). The postoperative pain scores and number of doses of analgesics used were comparable between the groups ( > 0.05). The time taken to perform PVB was much longer compared to the time taken to perform ESPB ( = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

USG PVB and ESPB were equally effective for postoperative analgesia for PCNL surgery.