急性新冠病毒感染期间使用帕罗韦德治疗对新冠后遗症发病的影响:一项基于电子健康记录的目标试验模拟研究,来自N3C和RECOVER联盟。

Effect of Paxlovid Treatment During Acute Covid-19 on Long Covid Onset: An EHR-Based Target Trial Emulation from the N3C and RECOVER Consortia.

作者信息

Preiss Alexander, Bhatia Abhishek, Aragon Leyna V, Baratta John M, Baskaran Monika, Blancero Frank, Brannock M Daniel, Chew Robert F, Díaz Iván, Fitzgerald Megan, Kelly Elizabeth P, Zhou Andrea, Carton Thomas W, Chute Christopher G, Haendel Melissa, Moffitt Richard, Pfaff Emily

出版信息

medRxiv. 2025 Apr 7:2024.01.20.24301525. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.20.24301525.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preventing and treating post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), commonly known as Long COVID, has become a public health priority. Researchers have begun to explore whether Paxlovid treatment in the acute phase of COVID-19 could help prevent the onset of PASC.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We used electronic health records from the National Clinical Cohort Collaborative (N3C) to define a cohort of 410,026 patients who had COVID-19 since April 1, 2022, and were eligible for Paxlovid treatment due to risk for progression to severe COVID-19. We used the target trial emulation framework to estimate the effect of Paxlovid treatment on PASC incidence. The treatment group was defined as outpatients prescribed Paxlovid within five days of COVID-19 index, and the control group was defined as all patients meeting eligibility criteria not in the treatment group. The follow-up period was 180 days. We estimated overall PASC incidence using a computable phenotype. We also measured incident cognitive, fatigue, and respiratory symptoms in the post-acute period. Paxlovid treatment had a small effect on overall PASC incidence (relative risk [RR] 0.94; 95% CI [0.90, 0.99]; p=0.011). It had a slightly stronger protective effect against cognitive (RR 0.86; 95% CI [0.77, 0.95]; p<0.001) and fatigue (RR 0.92; 95% CI [0.86, 0.97]; p=0.002) symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, Paxlovid had a weaker preventative effect on PASC than in prior observational studies, suggesting that Paxlovid is unlikely to become a definitive solution for preventing PASC. Differing effects by symptom cluster suggest that the etiology of cognitive and fatigue symptoms may be more closely related to viral load than that of respiratory symptoms. Future research should explore potential heterogeneous treatment effects across PASC subphenotypes.

AUTHOR SUMMARY

Paxlovid is indicated to prevent severe COVID-19.Long COVID is more likely after more severe COVID-19, so there is a plausible mechanism for Paxlovid to reduce the risk of developing Long COVID by preventing severe COVID-19.Only a few studies have examined the relationship between Paxlovid and Long COVID, with mixed results. To our knowledge, no studies have used causal inference methods to estimate Paxlovid's effect on PASC.If Paxlovid helps prevent Long COVID, it could be a powerful addition to the public health effort to reduce the burden of COVID-19. We used a cohort of 410,026 patients from the National Covid Cohort Collaborative's (N3C's) electronic health record database to estimate the effect of Paxlovid treatment during acute COVID-19 on the likelihood of developing Long COVID.We used the target trial emulation technique to estimate the causal effect of Paxlovid treatment using observational data.We found that Paxlovid treatment had a small effect on overall Long COVID incidence.We found that Paxlovid treatment had a slightly stronger effect on certain symptoms (cognitive and fatigue) of Long COVID. Paxlovid is unlikely to become a definitive solution for preventing Long COVID.However, Paxlovid may have a stronger effect on certain subtypes of Long COVID.This difference in effect by symptom also suggests that viral load may be a more common cause of cognitive and fatigue symptoms than of other Long COVID symptoms.This study's main limitation is that it estimates causal effects, but it is not randomized like a clinical trial. Instead, we control for other variables which could bias the estimate, but if we missed some important variables, the estimates could be incorrect.

摘要

背景

预防和治疗2019冠状病毒病感染的急性后遗症(PASC),即通常所说的“长新冠”,已成为一项公共卫生重点工作。研究人员已开始探索在新冠疫情急性期使用帕罗韦德治疗是否有助于预防PASC的发生。

方法与结果

我们使用了来自国家临床队列协作组(N3C)的电子健康记录,确定了一个由410,026名患者组成的队列,这些患者自2022年4月1日起感染新冠病毒,且因有进展为重症新冠的风险而符合帕罗韦德治疗条件。我们使用目标试验模拟框架来估计帕罗韦德治疗对PASC发病率的影响。治疗组定义为在新冠病毒感染指标出现后5天内开具帕罗韦德的门诊患者,对照组定义为所有符合纳入标准但不在治疗组的患者。随访期为180天。我们使用可计算表型估计总体PASC发病率。我们还测量了急性期后出现的认知、疲劳和呼吸道症状。帕罗韦德治疗对总体PASC发病率有较小影响(相对风险[RR] 0.94;95%置信区间[0.90, 0.99];p = 0.011)。它对认知(RR 0.86;95%置信区间[0.77, 0.95];p < 0.001)和疲劳(RR 0.92;95%置信区间[0.86, 0.97];p = 0.002)症状有稍强的保护作用。

结论

在本研究中,帕罗韦德对PASC的预防作用比之前的观察性研究弱,这表明帕罗韦德不太可能成为预防PASC的决定性解决方案。不同症状群的不同影响表明,认知和疲劳症状的病因可能比呼吸道症状与病毒载量的关系更密切。未来的研究应探索PASC亚表型之间潜在的异质性治疗效果。

作者总结

帕罗韦德被用于预防重症新冠。重症新冠后更易出现“长新冠”,因此帕罗韦德通过预防重症新冠来降低出现“长新冠”风险的机制是合理的。只有少数研究探讨了帕罗韦德与“长新冠”之间的关系,结果不一。据我们所知,尚无研究使用因果推断方法来估计帕罗韦德对PASC的影响。如果帕罗韦德有助于预防“长新冠”,它将成为减轻新冠负担的公共卫生工作的有力补充。我们使用了来自国家新冠队列协作组(N3C)电子健康记录数据库的410,026名患者队列,来估计急性新冠期间帕罗韦德治疗对出现“长新冠”可能性的影响。我们使用目标试验模拟技术,利用观察数据估计帕罗韦德治疗的因果效应。我们发现帕罗韦德治疗对总体“长新冠”发病率有较小影响。我们发现帕罗韦德治疗对“长新冠”的某些症状(认知和疲劳)有稍强的影响。帕罗韦德不太可能成为预防“长新冠”的决定性解决方案。然而,帕罗韦德可能对“长新冠”的某些亚型有更强的作用。这种症状方面的影响差异也表明,病毒载量可能是认知和疲劳症状比其他“长新冠”症状更常见的原因。本研究的主要局限性在于它估计因果效应,但不像临床试验那样是随机的。相反,我们控制了其他可能使估计产生偏差的变量,但如果我们遗漏了一些重要变量,估计可能会不正确。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e2/12234052/030b6cb30778/nihpp-2024.01.20.24301525v4-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索