López-Valverde Nansi, López-Valverde Antonio, Macedo de Sousa Bruno, Blanco Rueda José Antonio
Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Surgery, University of Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jan 8;11:1309851. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1309851. eCollection 2023.
This systematic review with meta-analysis evaluated the antioxidant effect of lycopene as an adjuvant treatment for periodontal disease. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were consulted. According to the PICOs strategy, inclusion criteria were established for intervention studies Randomized Controlled Trials in Probing depth subjects (participants) treated with conventional treatment and lycopene (intervention) compared to patients treated with conventional treatment (control) in which periodontal response to treatment (outcome) was assessed. The risk of bias for randomized studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The methodological quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis was measured using the Jadad scale. Quantitative data were analyzed using six random-effects meta-analyses, taking into account periodontal parameters: Probing Pocket Depth, Clinical Attachment Loss, Bleeding on Probing, Plaque Index, Uric Acid and Gingival Index. Six further meta-analyses were performed, according to the follow-up of the studies (short-, medium- and long-term). Of the 339 studies identified, only 7 met the eligibility criteria. The meta-analysis of the studies according to the parameters evaluated only obtained statistical significance in the assessment of plaque index ( = 0.003). Regarding follow-up periods, PPD was significant ( = 0.03) in the short term. bleeding on probing estimates were significant in the short and medium term ( = 0.008 and = 0.03, respectively), IP was significant in the short and medium term ( = 0.0003 and = 0.01, respectively) and gingival index in the short and medium term ( = 0.002 and = 0.02, respectively). Heterogeneity was high (I >50%) in all assessments, except for Clinical Attachment Loss (I = 16.7%). The results demonstrate that antioxidant treatment with lycopene could be useful as an adjunctive treatment for periodontal disease.
本项带有荟萃分析的系统评价评估了番茄红素作为辅助治疗牙周病的抗氧化作用。检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science数据库。根据PICOs策略,为干预研究制定了纳入标准:将接受常规治疗和番茄红素治疗(干预)的探诊深度受试者(参与者)的随机对照试验与接受常规治疗(对照)的患者进行比较,评估其对治疗的牙周反应(结果)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估随机研究的偏倚风险。使用Jadad量表衡量纳入荟萃分析的研究的方法学质量。考虑到牙周参数:探诊袋深度、临床附着丧失、探诊出血、菌斑指数、尿酸和牙龈指数,使用六项随机效应荟萃分析对定量数据进行分析。根据研究的随访情况(短期、中期和长期)又进行了六项荟萃分析。在检索到的339项研究中,只有7项符合纳入标准。根据评估参数进行的研究荟萃分析仅在菌斑指数评估中获得统计学意义(P=0.003)。关于随访期,短期探诊袋深度有显著差异(P=0.03)。探诊出血评估在短期和中期有显著差异(分别为P=0.008和P=0.03),探诊指数在短期和中期有显著差异(分别为P=0.0003和P=0.01),牙龈指数在短期和中期有显著差异(分别为P=0.002和P=0.02)。除临床附着丧失(I²=16.7%)外,所有评估中的异质性均较高(I²>50%)。结果表明,番茄红素抗氧化治疗可作为牙周病的辅助治疗方法。