Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 12;19(2):e0293025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293025. eCollection 2024.
Specialist care units cater to targeted cohorts of patients, applying evidence-based practice to people with a specific condition (e.g., dementia) or meeting other specific criteria (e.g., children). This paper aimed to collate perceptions of local consumers and health providers around specialist care units, as a model of care that may be considered for a new local healthcare facility.
This was a qualitative study using two-hour workshops and interviews to collect data. Participants were consumers and health providers in the planned facility's catchment: 49 suburbs in metropolitan Australia. Consumers and health providers were recruited through advertisements and emails. An initial survey collected demographic details. Consumers and health providers participated in separate two-hour workshops in which a scenario around the specialist unit model was presented and discussion on benefits, barriers and enablers of the model was led by researchers. Detailed notes were taken for analysis.
Five consumer workshops (n = 22 participants) and five health provider workshops (n = 42) were conducted. Participants were representative of this culturally diverse region. Factors identified by participants as relevant to the specialist unit model of care included: accessibility; a perceived narrow scope of practice; coordination with other services; resources and infrastructure; and awareness and expectations of the units. Some factors identified as risks or barriers when absent were identified as strengths and enablers when present by both groups of participants.
Positive views of the model centred on the higher perceived quality of care received in the units. Negative views centred on a perceived narrow scope of care and lack of flexibility. Consumers hinted, and providers stated explicitly, that the model needed to be complemented by an integrated model of care model to enable continuity of care and easy transfer of patients into and out of the specialist unit.
专科护理单元针对特定的患者群体提供服务,将循证实践应用于具有特定疾病(如痴呆症)或符合其他特定标准(如儿童)的人群。本文旨在综合当地患者和卫生服务提供者对专科护理单元的看法,将其作为一种可能适用于新的本地医疗保健设施的护理模式。
这是一项使用两小时研讨会和访谈来收集数据的定性研究。参与者是计划中的设施服务范围内的消费者和卫生服务提供者:澳大利亚大都市的 49 个郊区。通过广告和电子邮件招募消费者和卫生服务提供者。初始调查收集了人口统计细节。消费者和卫生服务提供者参加了单独的两小时研讨会,研究人员在研讨会上介绍了专科护理单元模式的情况,并就该模式的益处、障碍和促进因素展开了讨论。详细的笔记用于分析。
进行了五次消费者研讨会(n=22 名参与者)和五次卫生服务提供者研讨会(n=42 名参与者)。参与者代表了这个文化多元化的地区。参与者认为与专科护理单元模式相关的因素包括:可及性;实践范围狭窄;与其他服务的协调;资源和基础设施;以及对单元的认识和期望。当某些因素缺失时,被认为是风险或障碍,但当这些因素存在时,两组参与者都将其视为优势和促进因素。
对该模式的积极看法集中在患者在单元中获得的更高质量的护理。负面看法集中在护理范围狭窄和缺乏灵活性上。消费者暗示,卫生服务提供者明确表示,该模式需要与综合护理模式相结合,以确保护理的连续性,并便于患者在专科护理单元内外的转移。