• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从不吸烟人群肺癌风险预测模型:一项系统评价方案

Risk prediction models for lung cancer in people who have never smoked: a protocol of a systematic review.

作者信息

Issanov Alpamys, Aravindakshan Atul, Puil Lorri, Tammemägi Martin C, Lam Stephen, Dummer Trevor J B

机构信息

School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.

Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Diagn Progn Res. 2024 Feb 13;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41512-024-00166-4.

DOI:10.1186/s41512-024-00166-4
PMID:38347647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10863273/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers and the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Although smoking is the primary cause of the cancer, lung cancer is also commonly diagnosed in people who have never smoked. Currently, the proportion of people who have never smoked diagnosed with lung cancer is increasing. Despite this alarming trend, this population is ineligible for lung screening. With the increasing proportion of people who have never smoked among lung cancer cases, there is a pressing need to develop prediction models to identify high-risk people who have never smoked and include them in lung cancer screening programs. Thus, our systematic review is intended to provide a comprehensive summary of the evidence on existing risk prediction models for lung cancer in people who have never smoked.

METHODS

Electronic searches will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate Analytics), Scopus, and Europe PMC and Open-Access Theses and Dissertations databases. Two reviewers will independently perform title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction using the Covidence review platform. Data extraction will be performed based on the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modeling Studies (CHARMS). The risk of bias will be evaluated independently by two reviewers using the Prediction model Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) tool. If a sufficient number of studies are identified to have externally validated the same prediction model, we will combine model performance measures to evaluate the model's average predictive accuracy (e.g., calibration, discrimination) across diverse settings and populations and explore sources of heterogeneity.

DISCUSSION

The results of the review will identify risk prediction models for lung cancer in people who have never smoked. These will be useful for researchers planning to develop novel prediction models, and for clinical practitioners and policy makers seeking guidance for clinical decision-making and the formulation of future lung cancer screening strategies for people who have never smoked.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This protocol has been registered in PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42023483824.

摘要

背景

肺癌是最常被诊断出的癌症之一,也是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因。尽管吸烟是该癌症的主要病因,但肺癌也常见于从不吸烟的人群中。目前,被诊断出患有肺癌的从不吸烟者的比例正在增加。尽管有这一令人担忧的趋势,但这一人群不符合肺癌筛查的条件。随着肺癌病例中从不吸烟者的比例不断增加,迫切需要开发预测模型,以识别从不吸烟的高危人群,并将他们纳入肺癌筛查项目。因此,我们的系统评价旨在全面总结关于从不吸烟人群中现有肺癌风险预测模型的证据。

方法

将在MEDLINE(Ovid)、Embase(Ovid)、科学网核心合集(科睿唯安)、Scopus以及欧洲生物医学与健康科学数据库和开放获取学位论文数据库中进行电子检索。两名评审员将使用Covidence评审平台独立进行标题和摘要筛选、全文评审以及数据提取。数据提取将基于预测建模研究系统评价的关键评估和数据提取清单(CHARMS)进行。两名评审员将使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)独立评估偏倚风险。如果确定有足够数量的研究对同一预测模型进行了外部验证,我们将合并模型性能指标,以评估该模型在不同环境和人群中的平均预测准确性(例如,校准、区分度),并探索异质性来源。

讨论

该评价的结果将识别从不吸烟人群中肺癌的风险预测模型。这些模型将有助于计划开发新型预测模型的研究人员,以及寻求临床决策指导和制定未来从不吸烟人群肺癌筛查策略指导的临床医生和政策制定者。

系统评价注册

本方案已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42023483824。

相似文献

1
Risk prediction models for lung cancer in people who have never smoked: a protocol of a systematic review.从不吸烟人群肺癌风险预测模型:一项系统评价方案
Diagn Progn Res. 2024 Feb 13;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41512-024-00166-4.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Risk prediction models for emergence delirium in paediatric general anaesthesia: a systematic review.儿科全身麻醉后谵妄发生的风险预测模型:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):e043968. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043968.
5
Prognostic models for knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis.膝关节骨关节炎的预后模型:一项系统评价、批判性评估和荟萃分析的方案
Syst Rev. 2021 May 19;10(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01683-9.
6
The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.生物标志物对改良心脏风险指数在预测非心脏手术患者主要不良心脏事件和全因死亡率方面的比较和附加预后价值。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD013139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013139.pub2.
7
Prognostic prediction models for clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with visceral leishmaniasis: protocol for a systematic review.诊断为内脏利什曼病患者的临床结局预后预测模型的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 24;13(10):e075597. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075597.
8
Pre-treatment re-bleeding following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review of published prediction models with risk of bias and clinical applicability assessment.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后的治疗前再出血:对已发表的预测模型进行系统评价并评估偏倚风险和临床适用性
J Clin Neurosci. 2024 Jan;119:102-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.10.020. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
9
Clinical prediction models assessing response to radiotherapy for rectal cancer: protocol for a systematic review.评估直肠癌放疗反应的临床预测模型:系统评价方案
Diagn Progn Res. 2022 Oct 6;6(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41512-022-00132-y.
10
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision Medicine in Lung Cancer Screening: A Paradigm Shift in Early Detection-Precision Screening for Lung Cancer.肺癌筛查中的精准医学:早期检测的范式转变——肺癌精准筛查
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 19;15(12):1562. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121562.
2
Predictive performance of risk prediction models for lung cancer incidence in Western and Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.西方国家和亚洲国家肺癌发病风险预测模型的预测性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 4;15(1):4259. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83875-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA).个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型透明报告:系统评价和荟萃分析的清单 (TRIPOD-SRMA)。
BMJ. 2023 May 3;381:e073538. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073538.
2
Lung Cancer Absolute Risk Models for Mortality in an Asian Population using the China Kadoorie Biobank.亚洲人群中使用中国科控生物银行的肺癌死亡率绝对风险模型。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Dec 8;114(12):1665-1673. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac176.
3
Effect of Time Since Smoking Cessation on Lung Cancer Incidence: An Occupational Cohort With 27 Follow-Up Years.戒烟时间对肺癌发病率的影响:一项随访27年的职业队列研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;12:817045. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.817045. eCollection 2022.
4
Lung cancer mortality reduction by LDCT screening: UKLS randomised trial results and international meta-analysis.低剂量CT筛查降低肺癌死亡率:英国肺癌筛查试验随机试验结果及国际荟萃分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Sep 11;10:100179. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100179. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Screening for Lung Cancer in Individuals Who Never Smoked: An International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Early Detection and Screening Committee Report.从未吸烟人群的肺癌筛查:国际肺癌研究协会早期检测和筛查委员会报告。
J Thorac Oncol. 2022 Jan;17(1):56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.07.031. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
6
High-Ambient Air Pollution Exposure Among Never Smokers Versus Ever Smokers With Lung Cancer.高环境空气污染暴露在肺癌从不吸烟者与曾吸烟者中的对比。
J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Nov;16(11):1850-1858. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
7
Prognostic models for predicting relapse or recurrence of major depressive disorder in adults.成人重性抑郁障碍复发或复发预测的预后模型。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 6;5(5):CD013491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013491.pub2.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
10
Liverpool Lung Project lung cancer risk stratification model: calibration and prospective validation.利物浦肺项目肺癌风险分层模型:校准和前瞻性验证。
Thorax. 2021 Feb;76(2):161-168. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215158. Epub 2020 Oct 20.