Suppr超能文献

植物性饮食与心血管危险因素:一项横断面研究中弹性素食者、纯素食者和杂食者的比较

Plant-based diets and cardiovascular risk factors: a comparison of flexitarians, vegans and omnivores in a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Bruns Anja, Greupner Theresa, Nebl Josefine, Hahn Andreas

机构信息

Institute of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, 30159, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Nutr. 2024 Feb 12;10(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40795-024-00839-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The growing trend towards conscious and sustainable dietary choices has led to increased adoption of flexitarian diets, characterised by plant-based eating habits with occasional consumption of meat and processed meat products. However, the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors associated with flexitarian diets compared to both vegans and omnivores remain underexplored.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 94 healthy participants aged 25-45 years, categorized into long-term flexitarians (FXs ≤ 50 g/day of meat and meat products, n = 32), vegans (Vs, no animal products, n = 33), and omnivores (OMNs ≥ 170 g/day of meat and meat products, n = 29) were included. Various CVD risk factors were measured, including fasting blood samples for metabolic biomarkers, body composition analysis via bioimpedance, blood pressure measurements, arterial stiffness evaluated through pulse wave velocity (PWV) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) severity was determined using browser-based calculations (MetS-scores). Dietary intake was assessed using a Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), diet quality was calculated with the Healthy Eating Index-flexible (HEI-Flex), while physical activity levels were recorded using the validated Freiburger questionnaire.

RESULTS

The data showed that FXs and Vs had more beneficial levels of insulin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol compared to OMNs. Notably, FXs revealed the most favorable MetS-score results based on both BMI and waistline, and better PWV values than Vs and OMNs. In addition, FXs and Vs reported higher intake rates of vegetables, fruit, nuts/seeds and plant-based milk alternatives.

CONCLUSION

The flexitarian diet appears to confer cardiovascular benefits. While Vs had the most favorable results overall, this study supports that reducing meat and processed meat products intake, as in flexitarianism, may contribute to CVD risk factor advantages.

摘要

背景

有意识且可持续的饮食选择趋势日益增长,导致弹性素食饮食的采用率增加,其特点是以植物性饮食习惯为主,偶尔食用肉类和加工肉类产品。然而,与纯素食者和杂食者相比,弹性素食饮食相关的心血管疾病(CVD)风险因素仍未得到充分研究。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,纳入了94名年龄在25 - 45岁的健康参与者,分为长期弹性素食者(FXs,肉类和肉类产品摄入量≤50克/天,n = 32)、纯素食者(Vs,不食用动物产品,n = 33)和杂食者(OMNs,肉类和肉类产品摄入量≥170克/天,n = 29)。测量了各种CVD风险因素,包括用于代谢生物标志物的空腹血样、通过生物阻抗进行的身体成分分析、血压测量、通过脉搏波速度(PWV)评估的动脉僵硬度以及使用基于浏览器的计算方法(代谢综合征评分)确定代谢综合征(MetS)的严重程度。使用食物频率问卷(FFQ)评估饮食摄入量,用健康饮食指数 - 灵活版(HEI - Flex)计算饮食质量,同时使用经过验证的弗赖堡问卷记录身体活动水平。

结果

数据显示,与杂食者相比,弹性素食者和纯素食者的胰岛素、甘油三酯、总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平更有益。值得注意的是,基于体重指数(BMI)和腰围,弹性素食者的代谢综合征评分结果最为有利,并且其脉搏波速度值比纯素食者和杂食者更好。此外,弹性素食者和纯素食者报告的蔬菜、水果、坚果/种子和植物性牛奶替代品的摄入量更高。

结论

弹性素食饮食似乎对心血管有益。虽然总体上纯素食者的结果最有利,但这项研究支持,如弹性素食主义那样减少肉类和加工肉类产品的摄入量,可能有助于获得心血管疾病风险因素方面的优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c45/10860304/b09772497021/40795_2024_839_Fig2_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验