Department of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sport Science, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, Kristiansand, Agder4630, Norway.
Department of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science, Faculty of Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Västra Götaland, Sweden.
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):3051-3061. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023002124. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
To investigate whether food literacy competencies and diet quality vary between 16-to-24-year-olds vegans, lacto-ovo vegetarians, pescatarians, flexitarians and omnivores and to assess whether food literacy is associated with diet quality.
Cross-sectional study. Food literacy (general nutrition knowledge, critical nutrition literacy and food skills) and diet quality were measured using an electronic questionnaire.
Southern Norway, September 2021 - March 2022.
Healthy 16-24-year-olds ( 165).
Overall, the mean general nutrition knowledge score was moderate (48·0 out of 67·0); the lowest mean score was found in omnivores and the highest in flexitarians (45·6 . 51·5) ( = 0·034). The mean score of critical nutrition literacy was also moderate (3·7 out of 5·0); vegans showed higher scores compared to other dietary practices ( = 0·018). No difference was observed in food skills between the different dietary practices. The overall median diet quality score was 46·0 out of 80·0, lowest in omnivores and highest in vegans (42·0 . 56·0) ( =< 0·001). In multivariate regression analyses, general nutrition knowledge, food skills and vegan dietary practice were significantly associated with higher diet quality.
We found moderate levels of food literacy across all dietary practices. The food literacy competencies, general nutrition knowledge and food skills were associated with higher diet quality in our sample. Omnivores showed both the lowest general nutrition knowledge level and lowest diet quality scores. In contrast, both flexitarians and vegans scored highest on general nutrition knowledge and diet quality scores, despite being one of the less restrictive and one of the strictest plant-based dietary practices, respectively.
调查 16 至 24 岁的纯素食者、乳蛋素食者、鱼素食者、杂食者和肉食者的食物素养能力和饮食质量是否存在差异,并评估食物素养是否与饮食质量相关。
横断面研究。使用电子问卷测量食物素养(一般营养知识、批判性营养素养和食物技能)和饮食质量。
2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 3 月,挪威南部。
健康的 16 至 24 岁人群(165 人)。
总体而言,一般营养知识得分的平均值处于中等水平(67 分中的 48.0 分);得分最低的是杂食者,最高的是杂食者(45.6 分,51.5 分)(=0.034)。批判性营养素养的平均得分为中等水平(5 分制中的 3.7 分);与其他饮食方式相比,纯素食者的得分更高(=0.018)。不同饮食方式之间的食物技能没有差异。总体饮食质量评分中位数为 80 分中的 46.0 分,得分最低的是杂食者,最高的是纯素食者(42.0 分,56.0 分)(=<0.001)。多元回归分析表明,一般营养知识、食物技能和素食饮食与较高的饮食质量显著相关。
我们发现所有饮食方式的食物素养水平都处于中等水平。在我们的样本中,一般营养知识、食物技能和素食饮食与较高的饮食质量相关。杂食者的一般营养知识水平最低,饮食质量评分最低。相比之下,杂食者和纯素食者的一般营养知识和饮食质量评分均最高,尽管杂食者是限制最少的饮食方式之一,而纯素食者是最严格的植物性饮食方式之一。