• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How do residents respond to uncertainty with peers and supervisors in multidisciplinary teams? Insights from simulations with epistemic fidelity.住院医师在多学科团队中如何与同行和上级应对不确定性?来自具有认知保真度模拟的见解。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Feb 12;9(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00281-8.
2
Residents' identification of learning moments and subsequent reflection: impact of peers, supervisors, and patients.住院医师对学习时刻的识别及后续反思:同行、上级医师和患者的影响
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 2;20(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02397-7.
3
Tolerance of clinical uncertainty by geriatric residents: a qualitative study.老年住院医师对临床不确定性的耐受性:一项定性研究。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2019 Jun;10(3):517-522. doi: 10.1007/s41999-019-00199-9. Epub 2019 May 8.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Preparing tomorrow's medical specialists for participating in oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: perceived barriers, facilitators and training needs.为参与肿瘤多学科团队会议做好明天的医学专家的准备:感知到的障碍、促进因素和培训需求。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03570-w.
6
Leadership in the clinical workplace: what residents report to observe and supervisors report to display: an exploratory questionnaire study.临床工作场所中的领导力:住院医师报告观察到的情况与上级报告展示出的情况:一项探索性问卷调查研究
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Nov 2;15:195. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0480-5.
7
Simulation versus reality: what can interprofessional simulation teach us about team dynamics in the trauma bay?模拟与现实:跨专业模拟能让我们了解创伤急救室中的团队动态吗?
Global Surg Educ. 2022;1(1):56. doi: 10.1007/s44186-022-00063-8. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
8
How clinical supervisors develop trust in their trainees: a qualitative study.临床督导如何培养对其学员的信任:一项定性研究。
Med Educ. 2015 Aug;49(8):783-95. doi: 10.1111/medu.12745.
9
Little Patients, Big Tasks - A Pediatric Emergency Medicine Escape Room.小患者,大任务——一场儿科急诊医学密室逃脱游戏
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 31;8(4):SG1-SG19. doi: 10.21980/J89W70. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
Learning in a real-life escape room: an explorative study on the supervisory relationship in GP residency during the COVID-19 pandemic.在现实逃生室中学习:COVID-19 大流行期间对全科住院医师培训中监督关系的探索性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Apr 1;24(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02031-7.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of multidisciplinary simulations in cardio-obstetrics education: perspectives from simulated hemodynamically unstable patients.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Sep;5(9):101052. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101052. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
2
Fostering Adaptive Expertise Through Simulation.通过模拟培养适应型专长。
Acad Med. 2023 Sep 1;98(9):994-1001. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005257. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
3
"Maybe I'm not that approachable": using simulation to elicit team leaders' perceptions of their role in facilitating speaking up behaviors.“也许我没那么平易近人”:运用模拟方法来引出团队领导者对自身在促进直言行为中所扮演角色的看法。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Sep 24;7(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00227-y.
4
Need for Better and Broader Training in Cardio-Obstetrics: A National Survey of Cardiologists, Cardiovascular Team Members, and Cardiology Fellows in Training.需要更好、更广泛的心血管妇产科培训:对心脏病专家、心血管团队成员和培训中的心脏病学研究员的全国调查。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 19;11(8):e024229. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024229. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
5
Skeptical self-regulation: Resident experiences of uncertainty about uncertainty.怀疑性自我调节:住院医师对不确定性的不确定体验。
Med Educ. 2021 Jun;55(6):749-757. doi: 10.1111/medu.14459. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
Uncertainty in health care: Towards a more systematic program of research.医疗保健中的不确定性:迈向更系统的研究计划。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Oct;102(10):1756-1766. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
7
"Learning the Lingo": A Grounded Theory Study of Telephone Talk in Clinical Education.“学习行话”:临床教育中电话交谈的扎根理论研究。
Acad Med. 2019 Jul;94(7):1033-1039. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002713.
8
The Differences in Antibiotic Decision-making Between Acute Surgical and Acute Medical Teams: An Ethnographic Study of Culture and Team Dynamics.急性外科和急性内科团队在抗生素决策方面的差异:一项关于文化和团队动态的民族志研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 18;69(1):12-20. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy844.
9
Comfort with uncertainty: reframing our conceptions of how clinicians navigate complex clinical situations.对不确定性的舒适感:重新构建我们对临床医生如何应对复杂临床情况的概念。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 Oct;24(4):797-809. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9859-5. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
10
Resident hesitation in the operating room: does uncertainty equal incompetence?住院医师在手术室中的犹豫:不确定性是否等于无能?
Med Educ. 2018 Aug;52(8):851-860. doi: 10.1111/medu.13530. Epub 2018 Mar 25.

住院医师在多学科团队中如何与同行和上级应对不确定性?来自具有认知保真度模拟的见解。

How do residents respond to uncertainty with peers and supervisors in multidisciplinary teams? Insights from simulations with epistemic fidelity.

作者信息

Blissett Sarah, Skinner Jamila, Banner Harrison, Cristancho Sayra, Taylor Taryn

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Centre for Education Research and Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Feb 12;9(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00281-8.

DOI:10.1186/s41077-024-00281-8
PMID:38347654
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10863229/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Residents struggle to express clinical uncertainty, often exhibiting negative cognitive, behavioral, and emotional responses to uncertainty when engaging with patients or supervisors. However, the Integrative Model of Uncertainty Tolerance posits that individuals may have positive or negative responses to perceived uncertainty. Situational characteristics, such as interactions with other health professionals, can impact whether the response is positive or negative. The team context in which residents interact with resident peers and supervisors could represent varying situational characteristics that enable a spectrum of responses to uncertainty. Understanding the situational characteristics of multidisciplinary teams that allow residents to display positive responses to perceived uncertainty could inform strategies to foster positive responses to uncertainty in other contexts. We explored resident responses to perceived uncertainty in a simulated multidisciplinary team context.

METHODS

A simulation-primed qualitative inquiry approach was used. Fourteen residents from Cardiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology participated in simulation scenarios involving pregnant patients with heart disease. We incorporated epistemic fidelity through the deliberate inclusion of ambiguity and complexity to prompt uncertainty. Audio recordings of debriefing sessions were analyzed using directed content analysis.

RESULTS

Residents recognized that uncertainty is unavoidable, and positive responses to uncertainty are crucial to team dynamics and patient safety. While residents had positive responses to expressing uncertainty to peers, they had predominantly negative responses to expressing uncertainty to supervisors. Predominant negative response to supervisors related to judgement from supervisors, and impacts on perceived trustworthiness or independence. Although residents recognized expressing uncertainty to a supervisor could identify opportunities for learning and resolve their uncertainty, the negative responses overshadowed the positive responses. Residents highly valued instances in which supervisors were forthcoming about their own uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

Through participation in simulations with epistemic fidelity, residents reflected on how they perceive and respond to uncertainty in multidisciplinary teams. Our findings emphasize the role of situational characteristics, particularly peers and supervisors, in moderating responses to perceived uncertainty. The productive discussions around responses to uncertainty in debriefing sessions suggest further studies of multidisciplinary simulations could enhance our understanding of how uncertainty is expressed, and potentially be used as an instructional intervention to promote positive responses to uncertainty.

摘要

背景

住院医师难以表达临床不确定性,在与患者或上级交流时,面对不确定性往往表现出消极的认知、行为和情绪反应。然而,不确定性容忍度综合模型认为,个体对感知到的不确定性可能会有积极或消极的反应。情境特征,如与其他医护人员的互动,会影响这种反应是积极还是消极。住院医师与住院医师同伴及上级互动的团队环境可能代表了不同的情境特征,从而产生一系列对不确定性的反应。了解多学科团队中能让住院医师对感知到的不确定性表现出积极反应的情境特征,可为在其他情境中促进对不确定性的积极反应提供策略依据。我们在模拟的多学科团队环境中探究了住院医师对感知到的不确定性的反应。

方法

采用模拟引导的定性探究方法。来自心脏病学和妇产科的14名住院医师参与了涉及患有心脏病的孕妇的模拟场景。我们通过刻意引入模糊性和复杂性以引发不确定性,从而纳入认知保真度。使用定向内容分析法对汇报环节的录音进行分析。

结果

住院医师认识到不确定性是不可避免的,对不确定性的积极反应对团队动态和患者安全至关重要。虽然住院医师对向同伴表达不确定性有积极反应,但对向上级表达不确定性则主要表现出消极反应。对上级的主要消极反应与上级的评判以及对感知到的可信度或独立性的影响有关。尽管住院医师认识到向上级表达不确定性可以发现学习机会并解决他们的不确定性,但消极反应掩盖了积极反应。住院医师高度重视上级坦率承认自身不确定性的情况。

结论

通过参与具有认知保真度的模拟,住院医师反思了他们在多学科团队中如何感知和应对不确定性。我们的研究结果强调了情境特征,特别是同伴和上级,在调节对感知到的不确定性的反应中的作用。汇报环节中围绕对不确定性的反应进行的富有成效的讨论表明,对多学科模拟的进一步研究可以加深我们对不确定性如何表达的理解,并有可能用作促进对不确定性的积极反应的教学干预措施。