Belsky Jay
Human Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Dev Psychopathol. 2024 Dec;36(5):2197-2206. doi: 10.1017/S0954579424000166. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
Two perspectives on the nature of nurture are reviewed, one Mendelian and the other Darwinian, in an effort to draw links between the two and, thereby, integrate them in a developmental modern synthesis, mirroring the one that took place in biology early in the last century. Thus, the heritability of environmental measures and gene-X-environment interaction are discussed with respect to Mendelian nature before turning attention to Darwinian nature and thus the development of reproductive strategies and differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Conclusions are drawn with respect to both frameworks indicating that it is time to abandon the biology-is-destiny resistance to both approaches to studying and thinking about development, especially when it comes to the nature of nurture. Implications for the future development of the field of developmental psychopathology are highlighted.
本文回顾了关于教养本质的两种观点,一种是孟德尔式的,另一种是达尔文式的,旨在建立两者之间的联系,从而将它们整合到一个发展现代综合理论中,这类似于上世纪初生物学领域发生的综合。因此,在关注达尔文式本质以及生殖策略的发展和对环境影响的差异易感性之前,先从孟德尔式本质的角度讨论了环境测量的遗传性和基因 - 环境相互作用。针对这两个框架得出了结论,表明现在是时候摒弃那种认为生物学决定命运的观点,不再抗拒这两种研究和思考发展的方法了,尤其是在涉及教养本质的时候。文中还强调了这些结论对发展性心理病理学领域未来发展的影响。