• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用人工智能预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术的压力梯度。

Predicting pressure gradient using artificial intelligence for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

作者信息

Dasi Anoushka, Lee Beom, Polsani Venkateshwar, Yadav Pradeep, Dasi Lakshmi Prasad, Thourani Vinod H

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga.

出版信息

JTCVS Tech. 2023 Nov 30;23:5-17. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.11.011. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.11.011
PMID:38352010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10859647/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

After transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the mean transvalvular pressure gradient indicates the effectiveness of the therapy. The objective is to develop artificial intelligence to predict the post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement aortic valve pressure gradient and aortic valve area from preprocedural echocardiography and computed tomography data.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement due to aortic valve stenosis. A total of 1091 patients were analyzed for pressure gradient predictions (mean age 76.8 ± 9.2 years, 57.8% male), and 1063 patients were analyzed for aortic valve area predictions (mean age 76.7 ± 9.3 years, 57.2% male). An artificial intelligence learning model was trained (training: n = 663 patients, validation: n = 206 patients) and tested (testing: n = 222 patients) to predict pressure gradient, and a separate artificial intelligence learning model was trained (training: n = 640 patients, validation: n = 218 patients) and tested (testing: n = 205 patients) for predicting aortic valve area.

RESULTS

The mean absolute error for pressure gradient and aortic valve area predictions was 3.0 mm Hg and 0.45 cm, respectively. Valve sheath size, body surface area, and age were determined to be the top 3 predictors for pressure gradient, and valve sheath size, left ventricular ejection fraction, and aortic annulus mean diameter were identified to be the top 3 predictors of post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement aortic valve area. A training dataset size of more than 500 patients demonstrated good robustness of the artificial intelligence models for pressure gradient and aortic valve area.

CONCLUSIONS

The artificial intelligence-based algorithm has demonstrated potential in predicting post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement transvalvular pressure gradient predictions for patients with aortic valve stenosis. Further studies are necessary to differentiate pressure gradient between valve types.

摘要

目的

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后,平均跨瓣压差可表明治疗效果。目标是开发人工智能,根据术前超声心动图和计算机断层扫描数据预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的主动脉瓣压差和主动脉瓣面积。

方法

对因主动脉瓣狭窄接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的患者进行回顾性研究。共分析了1091例患者的压差预测情况(平均年龄76.8±9.2岁,男性占57.8%),以及1063例患者的主动脉瓣面积预测情况(平均年龄76.7±9.3岁,男性占57.2%)。训练(训练组:n = 663例患者,验证组:n = 206例患者)并测试(测试组:n = 222例患者)一个人工智能学习模型以预测压差,同时训练(训练组:n = 640例患者,验证组:n = 218例患者)并测试(测试组:n = 205例患者)另一个单独的人工智能学习模型以预测主动脉瓣面积。

结果

压差和主动脉瓣面积预测的平均绝对误差分别为3.0 mmHg和0.45 cm。确定瓣膜鞘尺寸、体表面积和年龄为压差的前3个预测因素,瓣膜鞘尺寸、左心室射血分数和主动脉瓣环平均直径被确定为经导管主动脉瓣置换术后主动脉瓣面积的前3个预测因素。超过500例患者的训练数据集规模表明人工智能模型对压差和主动脉瓣面积具有良好的稳健性。

结论

基于人工智能的算法在预测主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的跨瓣压差方面已显示出潜力。有必要进行进一步研究以区分不同瓣膜类型之间的压差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1341/10859647/d740079336b8/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1341/10859647/06ec51df98e2/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1341/10859647/d45494080a63/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1341/10859647/4ed6c1185ea6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1341/10859647/a66130898c4c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1341/10859647/ff8fb652261b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1341/10859647/d740079336b8/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1341/10859647/06ec51df98e2/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1341/10859647/d45494080a63/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1341/10859647/4ed6c1185ea6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1341/10859647/a66130898c4c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1341/10859647/ff8fb652261b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1341/10859647/d740079336b8/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting pressure gradient using artificial intelligence for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.使用人工智能预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术的压力梯度。
JTCVS Tech. 2023 Nov 30;23:5-17. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.11.011. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Artificial Intelligence Trumps TAVI-SCORE and CoreValve Score in Predicting 1-Year Mortality Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.人工智能在预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 1 年死亡率方面优于 TAVI-SCORE 和 CoreValve 评分。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Mar;24:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
3
Outcomes From Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Less Than 30%: A Substudy From the TOPAS-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄且左心室射血分数小于 30%患者的结局:TOPAS-TAVI 注册研究的一项子研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jan 1;4(1):64-70. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4320.
4
[Effects of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis].[经导管主动脉瓣置换术对重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的影响]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 24;47(7):528-533. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.07.004.
5
Protected complex percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve replacement using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a high-risk frail patient: a case report.高危体弱患者采用体外膜肺氧合进行受保护的复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和经导管主动脉瓣置换术:一例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2020 Sep 23;14(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13256-020-02474-x.
6
Predictors of Mortality and Symptomatic Outcome of Patients With Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低流量重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的死亡率和症状转归的预测因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 13;7(8):e007977. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007977.
7
Echocardiographic Versus Invasive Aortic Valve Gradients in Different Clinical Scenarios.超声心动图与有创主动脉瓣梯度在不同临床情况下的比较。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023 Dec;36(12):1302-1314. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2023.06.016. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
8
Longitudinal Hemodynamics of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valves in the PARTNER Trial.经导管主动脉瓣与外科主动脉瓣在 PARTNER 试验中的纵向血流动力学比较。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;2(11):1197-1206. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3306.
9
Valve Hemodynamics Following Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Small Aortic Annulus.经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗小主动脉瓣环患者的瓣膜血液动力学。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Mar 15;125(6):956-963. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.020. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
10
Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.自膨式经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan;12(1):67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.028. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Aortic shape and diameter variations are predictive of short-term complications in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.主动脉形态和直径变化可预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术的短期并发症。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 May;41(5):955-965. doi: 10.1007/s10554-025-03381-2. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
2
The Current Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Imaging for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中成像人工智能的现状
Curr Radiol Rep. 2024;12(11-12):113-120. doi: 10.1007/s40134-024-00431-w. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
3
Revolutionizing Cardiology through Artificial Intelligence-Big Data from Proactive Prevention to Precise Diagnostics and Cutting-Edge Treatment-A Comprehensive Review of the Past 5 Years.

本文引用的文献

1
Transvalvular Pressure Gradients and All-Cause Mortality Following TAVR: A Multicenter Echocardiographic and Invasive Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后跨瓣压差与全因死亡率:一项多中心超声心动图和有创登记研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Sep 26;15(18):1837-1848. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.07.033.
2
Classification of severe aortic stenosis and outcomes after aortic valve replacement.严重主动脉瓣狭窄的分类和主动脉瓣置换术后的结果。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 7;12(1):7506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11491-3.
3
A Preliminary Study on the Usage of a Data-Driven Probabilistic Approach to Predict Valve Performance Under Different Physiological Conditions.
通过人工智能革新心脏病学——从主动预防到精准诊断与前沿治疗的大数据——过去五年的全面综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 26;14(11):1103. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111103.
一种基于数据驱动的概率方法在预测不同生理条件下瓣膜性能中的初步研究。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2022 Aug;50(8):941-950. doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-02971-8. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
4
Patient Prosthesis Mismatch After SAVR and TAVR.外科主动脉瓣置换术和经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的患者-人工瓣膜不匹配
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 30;9:761917. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.761917. eCollection 2022.
5
Standardized Invasive Hemodynamics for Management of Patients With Elevated Echocardiographic Gradients Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement at Midterm Follow-Up.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后中期随访中,用于管理超声心动图梯度升高患者的标准化有创血流动力学
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan;15(1):e011243. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011243. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
6
Impact of Flow on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术后血流对人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Aug;14(8):e012364. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012364. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
7
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research.瓣膜学术研究联合会 3:主动脉瓣临床研究更新终点定义。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;77(21):2717-2746. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
8
Proper Selection Does Make the Difference: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Percutaneous and Surgical Cut-Down Transfemoral TAVR.恰当的选择确实会产生差异:经皮与外科切开经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术的倾向匹配分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 25;10(5):909. doi: 10.3390/jcm10050909.
9
Predictors of high residual gradient after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者残余梯度高的预测因素。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 May;110(5):667-675. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01793-9. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
10
Early Hemodynamic Profile after Aortic Valve Replacement - A Comparison between Three Mechanical Valves.主动脉瓣置换术后早期血流动力学特征——三种机械瓣膜的比较。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb 1;36(1):10-17. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0273.