• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双培训乳腺外科医生的 MS-TRAM/DIEP 乳房重建学习曲线。

The learning curve of the MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction by dual-trained breast surgeons.

机构信息

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.

Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Breast Tumor Hospital, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02344-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02344-z
PMID:38355459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10865591/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer surgeries involving MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction has traditionally been collaborative efforts between breast surgeons and plastic surgeons. However, in our institution, this procedure is performed by dual-trained breast surgeons who are proficient in both breast surgery and MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction. This study aims to provide insights into the learning curve associated with this surgical approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included eligible breast cancer patients who underwent MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction by dual-trained breast surgeons between 2015 and 2020 at our institution. We present the learning curve of this surgical approach, with a focus on determining factors affecting flap harvesting time, surgery time, and ischemic time. Additionally, we assessed the surgical complication rates.

RESULTS

A total of 147 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. Notably, after 30 cases, a statistically significant reduction of 1.7 h in surgery time and 21 min in ischemic time was achieved, signifying the attainment of a plateau in the learning curve. And the major and minor complications were comparable between the early and after 30 cases.

CONCLUSION

This study explores the learning curve and feasibility experienced by dual-trained breast surgeons in performing MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05560633.

摘要

背景

涉及 MS-TRAM/DIEP 乳房重建的乳腺癌手术传统上是乳腺外科医生和整形外科医生的合作努力。然而,在我们的机构中,该程序由精通乳腺手术和 MS-TRAM/DIEP 乳房重建的双训练乳腺外科医生进行。本研究旨在深入了解与这种手术方法相关的学习曲线。

材料和方法

我们纳入了 2015 年至 2020 年间在我们机构接受双训练乳腺外科医生 MS-TRAM/DIEP 乳房重建的合格乳腺癌患者。我们介绍了这种手术方法的学习曲线,重点是确定影响皮瓣采集时间、手术时间和缺血时间的因素。此外,我们评估了手术并发症发生率。

结果

共有 147 名符合条件的患者纳入本研究。值得注意的是,在进行了 30 例手术后,手术时间显著缩短了 1.7 小时,缺血时间缩短了 21 分钟,表明学习曲线达到了平台期。早期和 30 例后的主要和次要并发症相当。

结论

本研究探讨了双训练乳腺外科医生在进行 MS-TRAM/DIEP 乳房重建时所经历的学习曲线和可行性。

试验注册

NCT05560633。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7691/10865591/49f78d5b49c6/12893_2024_2344_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7691/10865591/304d1cec186a/12893_2024_2344_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7691/10865591/b52fc3f87b0d/12893_2024_2344_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7691/10865591/b220d66c11b3/12893_2024_2344_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7691/10865591/49f78d5b49c6/12893_2024_2344_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7691/10865591/304d1cec186a/12893_2024_2344_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7691/10865591/b52fc3f87b0d/12893_2024_2344_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7691/10865591/b220d66c11b3/12893_2024_2344_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7691/10865591/49f78d5b49c6/12893_2024_2344_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The learning curve of the MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction by dual-trained breast surgeons.双培训乳腺外科医生的 MS-TRAM/DIEP 乳房重建学习曲线。
BMC Surg. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02344-z.
2
[The DIEP Flap as Method of Choice in Breast Reconstruction - Results and Protocol for Succesful Reconstruction].[腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣作为乳房重建的首选方法——成功重建的结果与方案]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2015 Aug;47(4):222-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1398662. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
3
Myosonographic study of abdominal wall dynamics to assess donor site morbidity after microsurgical breast reconstruction with a DIEP or an ms-2 TRAM flap.腹壁动力学的肌超声检查,以评估采用腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP)或改良单蒂横行腹直肌肌皮瓣(ms-2 TRAM瓣)进行显微外科乳房重建术后供区并发症。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 May;69(5):598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
4
[Is there a psychological and physiological difference between DIEP- and free TRAM-flap? A retrospective patient survey].[腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣与游离腹直肌肌皮瓣在心理和生理上存在差异吗?一项回顾性患者调查]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2014 Aug;46(4):256-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1384578. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
5
A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣与游离腹直肌肌皮瓣用于显微外科乳房重建的成本效益分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;119(3):388-396. doi: 10.1002/jso.25325. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
6
Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.双侧 TRAM 与双侧 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建术后的发病率、功能结果和满意度比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Oct;126(4):1133-1141. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ea42d3.
7
DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣和带蒂横行腹直肌肌皮瓣:结局比较
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 May;117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000210679.77449.7d.
8
Main factors determining the use of free MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps and comparing the results of breast reconstruction.决定游离 MS-TRAM 皮瓣和 DIEP 皮瓣使用的主要因素及乳房再造结果比较。
J Med Life. 2023 Jan;16(1):121-128. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0227.
9
Meta-analysis of the safety and factors contributing to complications of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction.用于乳房重建的MS-TRAM、DIEP和SIEA皮瓣安全性及并发症相关因素的荟萃分析。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Aug;38(4):681-91. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0333-3. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
10
Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?采用腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP皮瓣)或保留肌肉的游离横腹直肌肌皮瓣(MS-2游离TRAM皮瓣)进行乳房重建:有差异吗?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Feb;115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000149404.57087.8e.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimal Scar Autologous Breast Reconstruction with Skin-sparing Mastectomy.保留皮肤的乳房切除术式的最小瘢痕自体乳房重建术
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Aug 7;11(8):e5176. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005176. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Complications related to the Cook-Swartz implantable Doppler probe use in head and neck microvascular reconstruction: a systematic review.与Cook-Swartz植入式多普勒探头在头颈部微血管重建中的应用相关的并发症:一项系统评价。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan;280(1):23-37. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07577-3. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
3
The Impact of a Single Dual-Trained Surgeon in the Management of Mastectomy and Reconstruction.
单双能训练外科医生在乳房切除术和重建管理中的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Apr 1;149(4):820-828. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008902.
4
Efficient DIEP Flap: Bilateral Breast Reconstruction in Less Than Four Hours.高效腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣:不到四小时完成双侧乳房重建。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Sep 7;9(9):e3801. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003801. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
The use of sentinel skin islands for monitoring buried and semi-buried micro-vascular flaps. Part I: Summary and brief description of monitoring methods.皮岛在监测埋置和部分埋置皮瓣血运中的应用。第一部分:监测方法概述及简要描述。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2021 Jun;165(2):113-130. doi: 10.5507/bp.2021.016. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
6
Cook-Swartz Doppler Probe Surveillance for Free Flaps-Defining Pros and Cons.库克-施瓦茨多普勒探头对游离皮瓣的监测——利弊分析
Surg J (N Y). 2020 Mar 3;6(1):e42-e46. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702922. eCollection 2020 Jan.
7
Robot-assisted Mastectomy Followed by Immediate Autologous Microsurgical Free Flap Reconstruction: Techniques and Feasibility in Three Different Breast Cancer Surgical Scenarios.机器人辅助乳房切除术后立即进行自体显微外科游离皮瓣重建:三种不同乳腺癌手术场景中的技术与可行性
Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Feb;20(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.06.018. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
8
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction With a Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: A Study of Patient Satisfaction.保留乳头的乳房切除术及采用腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣的即刻乳房重建:患者满意度研究
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;80(6):639-643. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001404.
9
Evolution in Monitoring of Free Flap Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Is There a Best Way?游离皮瓣自体乳房重建术后乳头保留乳房切除术的监测演变:是否有最佳方法?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 May;141(5):1086-1093. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004271.
10
Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: Review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications.保留乳头和皮肤的乳房切除术:目的、肿瘤安全性和禁忌证的综述。
Breast. 2017 Aug;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S82-S84. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.034. Epub 2017 Jun 30.