Patel-Syed Zabin, Becker Sara, Olson Miranda, Rinella Hailey, Scott Kelli
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Center for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Chicago, USA.
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Feb 14;5(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00549-0.
Pragmatic measures are essential to evaluate the implementation of evidence-based interventions. Cognitive interviewing, a qualitative method that collects partner feedback throughout measure development, is particularly useful for developing pragmatic implementation measures. Measure developers can use cognitive interviewing to increase a measure's fit within a particular implementation context. However, cognitive interviewing is underused in implementation research, where most measures remain "homegrown" and used for single studies. We provide a rationale for using cognitive interviewing in implementation science studies and illustrate its use through a case example employing cognitive interviewing to inform development of a measurement-based care protocol for implementation in opioid treatment programs. Applications of cognitive interviewing, including developing a common language with partners and collecting multi-level feedback on assessment procedures, to improve measurement in implementation science are discussed.
务实的措施对于评估循证干预措施的实施至关重要。认知访谈是一种定性方法，在整个测量开发过程中收集合作伙伴的反馈，对于制定务实的实施措施特别有用。测量开发者可以使用认知访谈来提高测量在特定实施背景下的适用性。然而，认知访谈在实施研究中的应用不足，在实施研究中，大多数测量方法仍是“自创的”，并仅用于单项研究。我们为在实施科学研究中使用认知访谈提供了理论依据，并通过一个案例来说明其应用，该案例运用认知访谈为在阿片类药物治疗项目中实施基于测量的护理方案提供依据。本文还讨论了认知访谈的应用，包括与合作伙伴建立共同语言以及收集关于评估程序的多层次反馈，以改进实施科学中的测量。
