• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引出父母对于基因组测序额外结果反馈的偏好和价值观。

Eliciting parental preferences and values for the return of additional findings from genomic sequencing.

作者信息

Goranitis Ilias, Meng Yan, Martyn Melissa, Best Stephanie, Bouffler Sophie, Bombard Yvonne, Gaff Clara, Stark Zornitza

机构信息

Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

NPJ Genom Med. 2024 Feb 14;9(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41525-024-00399-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41525-024-00399-8
PMID:38355752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10867021/
Abstract

Health economic evidence is needed to inform the design of high-value and cost-effective processes for returning genomic results from analyses for additional findings (AF). This study reports the results of a discrete-choice experiment designed to elicit preferences for the process of returning AF results from the perspective of parents of children with rare conditions and to estimate the value placed on AF analysis. Overall, 94 parents recruited within the Australian Genomics and Melbourne Genomics programmes participated in the survey, providing preferences in a total of 1128 choice scenarios. Statistically significant preferences were identified for the opportunity to change the choices made about AF; receiving positive AF in person from a genetic counsellor; timely access to a medical specialist and high-quality online resources; receiving automatic updates through a secure online portal if new information becomes available; and lower costs. For AF uptake rates ranging between 50-95%, the mean per person value from AF analysis was estimated at AU$450-$1700 (US$300-$1140). The findings enable the design of a value-maximising process of analysis for AF in rare-disease genomic sequencing.

摘要

需要卫生经济学证据来为设计高价值且具有成本效益的流程提供信息,以便从额外发现(AF)分析中返回基因组结果。本研究报告了一项离散选择实验的结果,该实验旨在从患有罕见病儿童的父母的角度引出对返回AF结果过程的偏好,并估计对AF分析的重视程度。总体而言,在澳大利亚基因组学和墨尔本基因组学项目中招募的94位父母参与了调查,在总共1128个选择场景中提供了偏好。对于改变关于AF所做选择的机会;由遗传咨询师亲自告知阳性AF结果;及时获得医学专家和高质量在线资源;如果有新信息通过安全的在线门户自动接收更新;以及降低成本等方面,确定了具有统计学意义的偏好。对于50%-95%的AF接受率,AF分析的人均价值估计为450澳元至1700澳元(300美元至1140美元)。这些发现有助于设计一种在罕见病基因组测序中使AF分析价值最大化的流程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7472/10867021/fec35adff1b9/41525_2024_399_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7472/10867021/fec35adff1b9/41525_2024_399_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7472/10867021/fec35adff1b9/41525_2024_399_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Eliciting parental preferences and values for the return of additional findings from genomic sequencing.引出父母对于基因组测序额外结果反馈的偏好和价值观。
NPJ Genom Med. 2024 Feb 14;9(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41525-024-00399-8.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Two-step offer and return of multiple types of additional genomic findings to families after ultrarapid trio genomic testing in the acute care setting: a study protocol.两步式提供和返回多种额外基因组发现给家庭后 ultrarapid 三人基因组测试在急性护理环境:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 2;13(6):e072999. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072999.
4
The value of genomic sequencing in complex pediatric neurological disorders: a discrete choice experiment.基因组测序在复杂儿科神经疾病中的价值:离散选择实验。
Genet Med. 2021 Jan;23(1):155-162. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-00949-2. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
5
Preferences and values for rapid genomic testing in critically ill infants and children: a discrete choice experiment.危重症婴儿和儿童快速基因组检测的偏好和价值观:一项离散选择实验。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Nov;29(11):1645-1653. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00874-1. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
6
Genomic sequencing for the diagnosis of childhood mitochondrial disorders: a health economic evaluation.基因组测序在儿童线粒体疾病诊断中的应用:一项卫生经济学评价。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 May;30(5):577-586. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00916-8. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
7
Eliciting Societal Preferences for Non-health Outcomes: A Person Trade-Off Study in the Context of Genomics. eliciting societal preferences for non-health outcomes: a person trade-off study in the context of genomics.
Clin Ther. 2023 Aug;45(8):710-718. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
8
The personal utility and uptake of genomic sequencing in pediatric and adult conditions: eliciting societal preferences with three discrete choice experiments.个人效用和基因组测序在儿科和成人疾病中的应用:通过三个离散选择实验得出社会偏好。
Genet Med. 2020 Aug;22(8):1311-1319. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0809-2. Epub 2020 May 6.
9
Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results.引出对次要发现的偏好:基因组次要结果偏好工具
Genet Med. 2017 Mar;19(3):337-344. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.110. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
10
Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.临床基因组测序中偶然发现结果反馈的社会偏好:一项离散选择实验
CMAJ. 2015 Apr 7;187(6):E190-E197. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.140697. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Public preferences for the value and implementation of genomic newborn screening: Insights from two discrete choice experiments in Australia.公众对基因组新生儿筛查的价值和实施的偏好:来自澳大利亚两项离散选择实验的见解。
Am J Hum Genet. 2025 Jul 3;112(7):1515-1527. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.05.001. Epub 2025 May 28.
2
Approaches to Incorporation of Preferences into Health Economic Models of Genomic Medicine: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis and Conceptual Framework.将偏好纳入基因组医学健康经济模型的方法:批判性解释性综合与概念框架
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):337-358. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00945-0. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

1
"Somewhere to turn to with my questions": A pre-post pilot of an information linker service for caregivers who have a child with a Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy.“有地方可就我的问题求助”:一项针对患有发育性和癫痫性脑病患儿的照料者的信息连接服务的前后对照试点研究
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2023 Nov;47:94-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
2
Two-step offer and return of multiple types of additional genomic findings to families after ultrarapid trio genomic testing in the acute care setting: a study protocol.两步式提供和返回多种额外基因组发现给家庭后 ultrarapid 三人基因组测试在急性护理环境:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 2;13(6):e072999. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072999.
3
Great expectations: patients' preferences for clinically significant results from genomic sequencing.
期望很高:患者对基因组测序产生临床显著结果的偏好。
Hum Genet. 2023 Apr;142(4):553-562. doi: 10.1007/s00439-023-02543-3. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
4
When is the best time to screen and evaluate for treatable genetic disorders?: A lifespan perspective.何时是筛查和评估可治疗遗传疾病的最佳时机?:从寿命角度看。
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2023 Mar;193(1):44-55. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.32036. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
5
Australian Genomics: Outcomes of a 5-year national program to accelerate the integration of genomics in healthcare.澳大利亚基因组学:5 年国家计划加速基因组学在医疗保健中的整合的结果。
Am J Hum Genet. 2023 Mar 2;110(3):419-426. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.01.018.
6
Genetics Adviser: a protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial evaluating a digital platform for genetics service delivery.遗传咨询师:一项混合方法随机对照试验的方案,旨在评估一个用于遗传服务提供的数字平台。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e060899. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060899.
7
Perspectives and preferences regarding genomic secondary findings in underrepresented prenatal and pediatric populations: A mixed-methods approach.针对代表性不足的产前和儿科人群中的基因组次要发现的观点和偏好:一种混合方法。
Genet Med. 2022 Jun;24(6):1206-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
8
Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.基因组研究中个体研究结果的返还:利益相关者观点的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0258646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258646. eCollection 2021.
9
Patient and public preferences for being recontacted with updated genomic results: a mixed methods study.患者和公众对更新的基因组结果被再次联系的偏好:一项混合方法研究。
Hum Genet. 2021 Dec;140(12):1695-1708. doi: 10.1007/s00439-021-02366-0. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
10
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.关于基因检测的离散选择实验和联合分析的系统评价。
Patient. 2022 Jan;15(1):39-54. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00531-1. Epub 2021 Jun 4.