Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e060899. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060899.
The high demand for genetic tests and limited supply of genetics professionals has created a need for alternative service delivery models. Digital tools are increasingly being used to support multiple points in the genetic testing journey; however, none are transferable across multiple clinical specialties and settings nor do they encompass the entire trajectory of the journey. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the Genetics Adviser, an interactive, patient-facing, online digital health tool that delivers pre-test counselling, provides support during the waiting period for results, and returns results with post-test counselling, encompassing the entire patient genetic testing journey.
We will compare the Genetics Adviser paired with a brief genetic counselling session to genetic counselling alone in a randomised controlled trial. One hundred and forty patients who previously received uninformative genetic test results for their personal and family history of cancer will be recruited from familial cancer clinics in Toronto and offered all clinically significant results from genomic sequencing. Participants randomised into the intervention arm will use the Genetics Adviser to learn about genomic sequencing, receive pre-test counselling, support during the waiting period and results, supplemented with brief counselling from a genetic counsellor. Participants in the control arm will receive standard pre-test and post-test counselling for genomic sequencing from a genetic counsellor. Our primary outcome is decisional conflict following pre-test counselling from the Genetics Adviser+genetic counsellor or counsellor alone. Secondary outcomes include: knowledge, satisfaction with decision-making, anxiety, quality of life, psychological impact of results, empowerment, acceptability and economic impact for patients and the health system. A subset of patients will be interviewed to assess user experience.
This study has been approved by Clinical Trials Ontario Streamlined Research Ethics Review System (REB#20-035). Results will be shared through stakeholder workshops, national and international conferences and peer-reviewed journals.
NCT04725565.
对基因检测的高度需求与遗传专业人员的有限供应之间存在矛盾,这使得人们需要寻求替代的服务提供模式。数字工具越来越多地被用于支持基因检测过程中的多个环节;然而,现有的数字工具既不能在多个临床科室和环境中转换使用,也不能涵盖整个检测过程。我们旨在评估 Genetics Adviser 的有效性,这是一种交互式的、面向患者的在线数字健康工具,它提供检测前咨询,在等待检测结果时提供支持,并在检测后提供咨询,涵盖整个患者基因检测过程。
我们将在一项随机对照试验中比较 Genetics Adviser 与简短遗传咨询的效果。该试验将招募 140 名曾因个人和家族癌症史接受过无意义基因检测的患者,他们将从多伦多的家族癌症诊所招募,并提供基因组测序的所有临床显著结果。被随机分配到干预组的参与者将使用 Genetics Adviser 了解基因组测序,接受检测前咨询,在等待检测结果期间获得支持,并在遗传咨询师的指导下进行简短咨询。对照组的参与者将接受遗传咨询师提供的基因组测序标准检测前和检测后咨询。我们的主要结果是通过 Genetics Adviser+遗传咨询师或咨询师提供的检测前咨询后,患者的决策冲突情况。次要结果包括:知识、决策满意度、焦虑、生活质量、检测结果的心理影响、赋权、接受程度和对患者及医疗系统的经济影响。将对一部分患者进行访谈,以评估用户体验。
这项研究已获得临床试验安大略省简化研究伦理审查系统(REB#20-035)的批准。研究结果将通过利益相关者研讨会、国家和国际会议以及同行评议期刊进行分享。
NCT04725565。